similar to: marked packets end up in wrong class

With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints? (kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15) tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate

Hi folks...!!! I need to generate qdisc statistics to show my 4 class (10, 20, 30, 40), i`ve all working with HTB and so on, but i need to graph this results e.gwith RRDTOOL. I found a script made in perl, that can to graph my 4 class, but i need to know which IP address on my LAN are using the bandwidth too, in other hand i need to classify the traffic by IP to show. This is an out of my

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

Hi! Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps? There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such a field? tc -s class show dev eth0 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2

Greetings - I''m new to QoS, so please be gentle (and yes, I''ve RTFM, though I don''t understand every bit of it) Here''s the thing; I''ve tried several scripts--simple and complex--for classifying my Vonage traffic into a high-priority queue, but no matter what I do it doesn''t seem to work. Right now I''m using the HTB script

Hi all, Can you tell me where is the documentation for the new IFB (implemented in kernels > 2.6.16). Thanks in advance! Nikolay

Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev

Hi, What exactly are the "tokens"? I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are stored in a bucket that can hold a max of "burst" tokens, and that this bucket is filled with tokens at "rate". But theory does not seem to explain the "tc -s .." output in the examples below. And I can''t figure out why or how... #tc qdisc

Hi to all of you!!! I am a Computer Science student trying to do the pre-grade thesis. I am trying to develop a free software tool to help administrators to control the traffic. Right now this tool is based on tc and iptables. I am having some problems trying to understand tc and tc examples: - Why in almost every list of tc rules based on htb class, there is a "tc qdisc dev ... root ...

Hello, I have a problem with simple traffic shapping in shorewall, my current configuration is: zones vlan10 ipv4 # interfaces vlan10 vlan10 detect tcpflags,routeback shorewall.conf TC_ENABLED=Simple tcinterfaces vlan10 Internal 1mbit:50kb shorewall show tc Device vlan10: qdisc prio 5: root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

Dear all, I''m having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I''m also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving later this month (I work in a university). In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down, 64kbit up, never to be allowed more bandwidth than this. It is also important that the latency remains

Thanks for quick reply Andreas! > Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to > borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects > borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class > 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does. Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

Hi all, First, let me say I''ve been most impressed with how quickly and professionally people on this list ask and answer questions. Next, let me say that with which I need help is properly configuring strict PQ, and gathering certain stats. Specifically: - I need to create a priority queue with four queues (let''s say they are of high, medium, normal, and low priority) - I

Hi, I''m using tc and HTB to shape my outgoing ADSL traffic. I was trying to make some graphs on the classes by meassuring the "sent bytes" of each class using rrdtool to store the data (as kbps after conversion). I expected that meassuring the root class I would get values similar that the ones I get measuring the interface counters but they differ by a large amount. Is

The docs[1][2] suggest it''s 1024, but tc says something else: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1kbps latency 50ms burst 1500 # tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0 qdisc tbf 8009: rate 8000bit burst 1499b lat 48.8ms ^^^^^^^ Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 If 1k were 1024, then I would have 8192bit above.

Hi all. Since I move on to 2.6 kernel , filter ingress policy based on nfmark won´t work. Sorry for my english. Simple example: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 1 ${QDISC_ADD} handle ffff: ingress ${FILTER_ADD} parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1 fw \ police rate 128Kbit burst 10k drop flowid 2:11 # tc -s -d qdisc ls dev eth0 qdisc ingress ffff: ----------------

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit