similar to: tc qdisc replace failing

Hi Everyone, This is a simple question but I don''t understand why the below tbf is not working as expected by throttling traffic to 5kbps If I throttle a PC''s traffic using the below when traffic exceeds 5kbps packets start getting dropped (as they should) but all traffic gets dropped. not just the bit over 5kbps. TC="tc add dev ppp0" $TC parent 8001:2 handle 2:

Hi all! I just started to experiment with bandwidth management using tbf. I have the folowing problems with token understanding: 1) What unit is token? Is "1 token = 1 byte" ? If this is so, then with rate=0.5mbit and HZ=100 the bucket gets filled with 0,64kb (655 tokens) every 10ms? 2) How much tokens are used for one packet (1500)? 3) And token unrelated question. Does

Hi have set the following tbf tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 0.5mbit \ burst 5kb latency 70ms peakrate 1mbit \ minburst 1540 I want to add a filter so the ip traffic pass from it.. plz help me __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hi! I was updated kernel from 2.4.22 to 2.4.23 and now tc tools can''t correctly determine default (pfifo_fast) qdisc on interface: # tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp0 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: [Unknown qdisc, optlen=20] but, if I assign f.e. cbq qdisc for some device all show correctly: # tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp1 qdisc tbf 8009: rate 32Kbit burst 10Kb lat 1.5s qdisc cbq 66: rate 10Mbit

I''m trying to build a wan latency test environment, where packets from different "remote" locations get delayed by different amounts of time, depending on which remote location we''re pretending they are from. Currently, I''m doing this using the ''prio'' qdisc to obtain multiple bands, and hanging a different netem qdisc off each of the branches

Hi, My branch office as got a 256Kbps b/w from their service provider at a very very high rate per Mb. They don''t require 256Kbps at all but the ISP does not offer anything low. Can we restrict the bandwith to say 64Kbps nothing fancy? How do I go about it? With warm regards, -Payal

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Hello *! My trafficshaping (tc-htb) drops packets very early, at least i suspect this. It drops about 30% fo the packets. The traffic-generating appication is running locally on the shaping host. I think i can lower this rate by increasing the packet-buffer, because the locally application will slow down with increasing buffer (tcp/ip). But i can´t find any options for that, i cycled the manual

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

Hi, I have met the problem: when I use the shaping discipline tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:2 tbf latency 50ms burst 1450 rate 50kbit one of my application (namely, "aMule") starts leaving sockets in "CLOSING" state. These sockets accumulate and do not disappear. Eventually I have so many of these dead sockets that the kernel warns "Out of socket memory" in

Dear Community, sorry for the somewhat dumb question. Maybe someone has any pointer to how to setup the RED queue to mark pakets with ECN. In particular what are appropriate parameter settings for limit, min, max, etc. All my trials end up with either "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", although the command line (at least for me) looks fine in regard to what is said on the

Hello, I''m still new in using tc...I wanna ask... 1. what is the difference between classless and classful qdisc?? when I made a qdisc, are I must create both of that qdisc...??? 2. what is the difference beetween three of the classless qdisc in linux redhat 2.4, sfq pfifo and tbf if I using the htb classful qdisc ??? because when I use htb classful qdisc it means I made a qdisc that

Hell I''m new to Qdisc programming and I was wondering, what is the difference between using an internal Qdisc (like e.g. TBF does) vs. not using internal Qdisc (like e.g. SFQ does)? Can someone give me a quick rundown of pro and cons? with regards R.harper _________________________________________________________________ Undgå pop-ups med MSN Toolbar - http://toolbar.msn.dk hent den

Hi All, I read the advanced networking howto and find a useful way to shape my adsl link. is says: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1500 [...] Change 220kbit to your uplinks *actual* speed, minus a few percent. If you have a really fast modem, raise ''burst'' a bit. " My adsl''s upload brandwidth is about 120 kbits/sec,

Hello, I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which goes: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs) and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too much, I gradually increased

I need some suggestions, I want to limit the up and down bandwidth of PPPoE users that are terminated on a Linux router (kernel 2.6). What are my options, can I apply tbf qdisc on a ppp interface? That would limit the download, what about the upload? Any suggestions are welcome. -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!!

Hi all, I''ve not been able to find an explanation of the relationship between prio and rate as they apply to the HTB technique. Hopefully someone on here will be able to help me. As I understand things, when prio values are assigned to an HTB setup, classes with a given prio value will only be serviced when there are no packets waiting in classes with a lower prio value. Now, does

There is an design problem with the qdisc interface that causes qlen related bugs in netem, tbf, and other qdisc''s that peek at the top of the queue. The problem is that requeue needs to be called from the dequeue function but requeue can fail. If requeue fails, then the calling qdisc can not properly handle the error. If it returns NULL, then the parent''s expectation about qlen