similar to: Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Message-ID: <200511021507.43661.Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" > > On Wednesday 02 November 2005 14:59, szogunek wrote: >> i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit >> i want 95kbit with

Hello All, I have Samba 3.0 and 3.0.7 servers that have similar problem , the problem occures once a week ~aprox, all about 1 per minute samba server created smbd -D process with root ownership thats never die, the server stucks after about 200 such processes and I need to reboot it to release the stuck. There is someone knows why it happens Denis

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

I have a set of linear equations and would like to find any feasible solution. A simplex solution works in Case 1 below, but not in Case 2. I would be grateful for any help. Case 1: Find any feasible solution for the set of linear equations: a + b + c = 5 a + b + 0c = 4 0a + b + c = 4 Solution - a feasible (and unique) solution is a=1, b=3, c=1. The following R code

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hi, I have the following setup: (sip clients) -internet- asterisk A -IAX- asterisk B -PRI- (pstn) This works fine for regular calls sip->pstn. the calls go through perfectly. However, when one of the sip clients (a snom320) is set to redirect to the pstn, then all I hear is congestion tones when I call that sip client. I am at a loss to see why the redirected call would fail, when the

Hello everybody. I found out the other day something quite astonishing (which I guess is not astonishing at all to those in the know): in d-dimensional space, determining whether a given point is inside the convex hull of a set of n points is elegantly and quickly solvable using linear programming. If the columns of matrix "ff" are the coordinates of the set of points, then in d=2

Hello, what i want to do is to find a way how i can solve the following problem. we want to offer our customers in the country side also isdn over voip but we have to use internet connections from another company for this. This company offers a QoS on this connections but only with 192kbit bandwith and with the ATM headers a normal g711a call has exactly 103,5 kbit/s so we can only use 1 channel

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hello, I am attempting to setup a PXE setup for a network using multiple subnets. The current layout has dhcp on one subnet (10.16.215.8/30), tftp on another (10.16.194.0/23), and the system to be installed on yet another subnet ( 10.16.233.0/24 [there's actually about 30 different subnets the system to be installed could be on]). When I have the system to be installed on the same subnet as

I get the following error when trying to compile: win32-changejournal-0.2.0-1 on: Windows 2000, Service Pack 4 Microsoft Visual Studio 6 Any ideas? Thanks, Zach ----- ERROR BELOW----- C:\unzipped\win32-changejournal-0.2.0-1\win32-changejournal-0.2.0>nmake Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.9782.0 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

current content below is annotated by some suggestions of things to add along with questions for those who know more than I do [in brackets] ================ # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu This calculates the proper MSS for your link. [If I understand the code correctly ... - expert intervention invited] More precisely, this sets the

Martin Devera wrote: > If you read the manual, the algorithm will not work correctly > with {,c}burst < MTU ... > devik > I just tried to change {,c}burst to 1600, or leaving them by default but no visible result. here is the latest tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:101 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 40Kbit ceil 40Kbit burst 1599b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1599b/8 mpu 0b quantum 512 level

Hi there, i''m trying to shape incoming trafic on my linux box. I want it to depend on the source IP adress of the packets (in fact, i got a VPN on an ADSL link and wanted to get at least/max 64Kbit/s for the VPN) So i tried this : tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

> > Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:44:42 +0200 From: Michal Soltys > <nozo@ziu.info> Subject: Re: [LARTC] I''m having an issue with u32 > masking To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Message-ID: > <46EF8FFA.6070707@ziu.info> Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Vadtec wrote: >> > Is this how tc is supposed to work? Does it only