Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "HTB, rate and ceil question"
2005 Sep 30
3
Ceil Rate
Hi all,
I just recently began using HTB to try and manage bandwidth for my network.
This is the script I''m using:
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth1 -s ! 192.168.244.2 -j MARK --set-mark 53
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 131072k quantum 59000
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10
2003 Apr 09
1
HTB Question
Hi Stef,
Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I
receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I
don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t
mind
Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please.
What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from
2007 Feb 12
0
htb: rate bigger then ceil
Hi,
we have upgraded a gateway machine for our network and suddenly
shaping doesn''t work as it used to. Before the upgrade the traffic was
shaped correctly - both OUTPUT and FORWARD packets shared the same
class and it just worked. But now only FORWARD packets are shaped,
OUTPUT uses whole line bandwidth.
This is a piece of output from tc -s class show dev eth1:
class htb 1:894 parent
2013 Apr 07
2
group data in classes
Hello all!
I have a problem to group my data (years) in 10 years classes. For example
for year
year decade
1598 1590-1600
1599 1590-1600
1600 1590-1600
1601 1600-1610
---
my is like this>
[1] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611
1612
[16] 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626
1627
[31] 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633
2004 Jul 20
3
Fw: HTB - Really Big problem
----- Original Message -----
From: Michał Joachimiak
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: HTB - Really Big problem
Hello everybody!
Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem.
I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9.
I''ve got situation like this:
LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux
2006 Feb 10
3
htb root don''t reach ceil rate?
Hello,
i have a htb setup where the root and (nearly) all child classes has a
ceil rate with max up from my adsl line. But the root class don''t reach
the ceil value but some childs are get a huge backlog.
My setup: (tc -d class show dev ppp0) [cleaned a bit]
********************************************************
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 cburst
2007 Aug 01
4
tc shown rate larger than ceil (was "Weird rate in HTB")
An earlier exchange about someone seeing the rate larger than the
ceiling is posted below. Andy explained the reason for the "above
ceiling" rate in Daniel''s output . . . but I just saw an example that
doesn''t fit.
>> tc output >>
class htb 1:14 parent 1:1 leaf 14: prio 1 quantum 3072 rate 256000bit
ceil 282000bit burst 1820b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b
2009 Dec 18
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2006 Jun 01
1
progressive slowdown during script execution?
I'm an R novice, so I hope my question is a valid one. I'm trying to
run the following script in the current version of R.
for (i in 1:1640){for (j in (i+1):1641){
if (i == 1 && j == 2){x <- cor(sage[i,],sage[j,],method="spearman"); y
<- cor(frie[i,],frie[j,],method="spearman")}
if (i != 1 || j != 2){x <-
2006 Jun 01
0
progressive slowdown during script execution? [Broadcast ]
You should try to figure out how large x and y need to be, and allocate them
before the computation. "Growing" objects like that in R is very, very,
very bad, as you've found out.
Andy
From: Tim Alcon
>
> I'm an R novice, so I hope my question is a valid one. I'm trying to
> run the following script in the current version of R.
>
> for (i in 1:1640){for
2017 Jan 18
1
AD attibutes of the (in this case) member servers differences.
Hai,
Im setting up a new proxy with winbind en kerberos auth.
So far everything ok but now im setting up my nfsv4 (with automount with systemd) for my user login on that server.
For the new setup i compaired my old proxy with my new proxy.
I noticed the old proxy is missing some attibutes in the AD object.
For example,
Samba member1 ( installed as 4.3.x ) upgraded to 4.5.3 here
2006 Sep 02
1
html not rendering apache/mongrel
We are running Apache and Mongrel on RHEL4 and have been experiencing
some interesting behaivor. Sometimes when someone logs into our
application (it uses the acts_as_authencticaed and acl_system2) the
following happens. Instead of the browser rendering the html and
displaying all the form elements corretly as you would expect, it simple
spews back the output without attempting to render. So
2014 Apr 08
1
wbinfo on DC and member server different output
Hai,
?
wbinfo -u?give?back?on?my?Domain?Controller.?
Administrator
Guest
krbtgt
dns-dc1
dns-dc2
and? wbinfo -g
Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers
Domain Admins
Domain Users
Domain Guests
Domain Computers
Domain Controllers
Schema Admins
Enterprise Admins
Group Policy Creator Owners
Read-Only Domain Controllers
DnsUpdateProxy
on the member server :??
administrator
dns-dc2
dns-dc1
krbtgt
2005 Jan 05
0
tc and ntop inconsistent trafic.
Dear List,
I am trying to limit some IP blocs with tc with following three step.
# interface
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 256kbit
# class
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 64kbit \
allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated
# rules
# download
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 \
match ip dst 10.0.1.0/24 flowid 1:1
# upload
tc
2006 Feb 23
4
HTB: far unequal behaivor at a slight conf rate change
Hi all!
I''m working in a " _really_ end user simple", yet powerfull, flexible,
scalable, GPL htb/htb-init front end, but now, in the "test fase" im facing
an utlimate problem...
Absoult minimalistic scenario: #Use a FIXEDFONT to read this
#inet-ethx-|FIREWALL|-lan-ethx <-> |client_host_1|
#
#FIREWALL class(rate,ceil) at lan-ethx
2002 Oct 16
10
htb limiting trouble: no overlimit or dropped packets
Hi!
I''m trying to limit the uplink bandwidth using htb but no packets are
overlimit or dropped. :-(
My router config:
* Linux kernel 2.4.20-pre10 (htb v3.7) with everything built as
modules in QoS, iptables in use.
* tc binary from htb3.6-020525.tgz
* external interface eth0: Internet access, 512 kbit/s uplink speed
* internal interface eth1: internal LAN, 100 Mbit/s
The hosts in the
2004 Jan 20
1
htb+beginner+error
Good day all
So at log last I did my script
We have a 256kbite connection.This scrip runs on my gateway box(the same
for script for eth1(ext) and eth0(int)
I want to limit all other traffic to 10kbites but when I do it I give me
this error:
HTB quantum of class 10034 is to small.consider r2q <7>htb*g j=42801780
Here is my script.If you have any Idea to better it let me know.Its a
bit from
2006 Jan 08
2
HTB - not borrowing, not exceeding rate
Hello!
I have a quite complicated setup. In my network on each interface there is
bandwidth limitation for each user. Booth outgoing (on interface itself) and
incoming (attached IMQ) traffic. There is main HTB class which limits
bandwidth for whole interface and HTB subclasses for each user. Filtering is
done with hashing filters. This setup was working correctly.
But now in the network I
2005 Mar 12
0
What are the proper values for rate/ceil in tc ?
Hello!
I am using shapping whith htb. My question is what are the propper values I can use in rate/ceil. I use htb.init for quick building of my classes/rules and have 2 groups of clients with 2 different bandwidth assignemet :
A. 16--->48kbps
B. 16---->128Kbps
It seems to work everything OK, but can I use lower values for rate like 8Kbps ? What about using 32-->96Kbps? I let htb to
2005 Jan 06
3
tc and ntop inconsistent data flow
Dear List,
Sorry for the dublicated email but I couldn''t get any answer.
I am trying to limit some IP blocs with tc with following three step.
# interface
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 256kbit # class
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 64kbit \
allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated
# rules
# download
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: