Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "PowerPC can not accurately run HTM"
2005 Jan 01
2
htb bridge problem, please chceck my config
hello. i have following setup:
a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge
with
2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network)
machine does not have any IP
there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2
eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0
i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has
1mbit
all our IP addresses are public and we have the
2007 Aug 19
0
HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc
Hello...
Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams
that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc
within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design.
Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt
show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc.
Linux 2.6.20.7
iproute-2.6.20-070313
Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:
2004 Jan 28
4
Problems with HTB (ceil being overpassed)
We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running
Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps
international internet pipe / , as this:
Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting
Network
lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from
the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an
2001 Sep 27
0
Not bounded but almost....
Hi, I have a question about CBQ and wonder if I can make a class that are
guaranteed 2Mbit but can borrow excess bandwith and only to specific rate.
In my exampel below I want to guarantee the network x.x.x.x/y 2Mbit and
they can borrow up to MAX 4Mbit.
I have tried to create subclasses but it only works like bounded or not.
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt
2004 Oct 06
5
What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for accurate operation?
Hi,
I''m trying to setup QoS in my TSL box. Following to mailing list reccomendations I changed PSCHED_CPU but can''t get accurate shaping with HTB. I have disabled HYSTERESIS also (by setting it to 0).
I have Intel Celeron 1.8Mhz (TSC supported I think).
******** My script ******
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 22 r2q 10
# Class corresponding interface
2007 Jan 16
8
egress bandwidth not limited / limited extremely inaccurately
I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone.
I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth
management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send
at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever
tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress
however, I get very odd results at different speeds.
With
2005 Jun 18
6
htb child classes don''t borrow form "parent''s parent class" :(
Dear list,
I have the problem that child classes don''t seem to issue the parent
class to borrow from their parent.
This is a simplified version of my script:
tc qdisc del dev $DEV root
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1kbit ceil
512kbit
#groups
tc
2003 Jul 18
2
HTB + BRIDGE QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi everybody!
I am very glad to get htb test information from www.docum.org for the htb performance.
Today, I setup a bridge using brctl. my setup as following:
192.168.2.26 | | |
|------------- | HTB+BR box |-------- 192.168.2.18
| eth0 | | eth1
192.168.2.29 | | |
I want to limit
2006 Jan 06
6
HTB traffic shaping odd effects
Hi,
I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on
our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the
lartc.org site:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil
80mbit burst 19k
tc class add dev eth0
2007 May 11
1
HTB and bursts
2005 Dec 14
3
exact rate
Hello
I am using htb (krenel 2.6.14.3 + esfq patch from fatooh.org) to limit the
bandwidth. But I want the absolute maximum rate to be for example 5Mbit
and not to exceed it.
here is the script:
$tc qdisc add dev ${NETIF} root handle 1 htb r2q 4
$tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1: classid 1:21 htb rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit
$tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1:21 classid 1:101 htb rate 2Mbit ceil
2002 Aug 05
1
Question on FW and htb
Hi,
I''ve try to use htb to limit outgoing traffic but it
seems that it doesn''t work. I guess the probem is the
filter. Here is my script.
#!/bin/sh
echo "Add root qdisc, default traffic go to 1:30"
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
100mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10
2004 Nov 01
1
Big problem :(((((
Hello!
I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps.
I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational.
I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for
2002 Nov 12
1
pb with imq
hi stef
oone more pb while shaping incoming traffic with imq .this one
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: pfifo
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent
2004 Dec 22
0
HFSC again.
Hello list,
I am now using hfsc for QOS. I have something like this:
tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: hfsc default 9
tc class add dev ethx parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls m2 70mbit ul m2 70mbit
tc class add dev ethx parent 1:1 classid 1:9 hfsc ls m2 7mbit
#DNS stuff follows
tc class add dev ethx parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc rt m1 12mbit d 1ms m2 1mbit
#Half-life
tc class add dev ethx parent
2006 Jun 27
0
tc filter problems, please help...
Hi Guys,
I have a couple of problems that are driving me nuts.
This is the script I am using to setup restirctions and bw limitations:
#Adding root class.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit
burst 2k quantum 1536
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null
tc
2003 Jun 15
3
how to emulate large IP routing table
Hi all
I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and
MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be
faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers),
result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table
in one core router.
can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command
:
2007 Oct 16
0
Determining burst/cburst HTB values
Hello.
I am wondering if the default (auto-computed) burst and cburst parameters are appropriate values for my application.
I have a 100 mbit interface which is connected to a 16 mbit uplink.
I am sharing this bandwidth into a set of partitions (tc classes) defined as follows:
root class [1:1]
|
2005 Jun 28
0
Re: Questin regarding HTB
Yes sure here they are:
The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all:
#!/bin/bash
ETH_IN="eth1"
ETH_OUT="eth0"
BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit"
# pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui
sa ajunga trafic necunoscut,
# care nu e organizat in shape-uri
BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit"
#Shape generale
/sbin/tc
2005 Jun 22
1
Problem with HTB and IPTABLES
Dear All,
Im working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and
having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the
default queue, they dont care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue
them. : -/
Thats the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified
and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the
PREROUTING