similar to: Load balance with Multiple Links

I am working on my Diploma Thesis on Computer Science Engineering. The main idea behind of my work is to make it possible to have a Linux box combining multiple ISP/network connections together providing a single connection with an aggregated bandwith. I have been surfing the Internet and I haven''t found anything like that running on Linux. I would like to implement it using iproute 2

hello, my name is Denny. I am new in this list. I am trying use multiple uplinks as describe in the lartc documentation (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) with squid transparent proxy in my gateway server. let me draw the configuration : /----------------- -----DSL1-----| \ |Transparent proxy |----Local network -----DSL2-----|

Hi there. I''ve two Internet connections at the same box, one connection is made through ADSL, and another is made with a Radio-Link (WaveLAN IE822). I wan''t to do a backup connection with the ADSL link. With what tools I can do this? ipchains, iptables, a third party tool? -- ____________________________________________________________ PIII 500MHz - 98MB RAM -

Hi I want to use two dsl (or more) lines to increase my internet bandwidth. Our dsl lines are dhcp serviced. Both of them provide the same Def GW and different IPs for each ethernet interface (same subnet). ¿Is it possible to balance outgoing traffic "using" the interface as a criteria? No point on choosing gateway by IP. ¿Could someone give me a clue on how to deal with this? (first

Hello everyone... I have a little trouble and need some help :P How can I check on which interface the packet is going (eth0, eth1; I have two ISP and on eth3 little LAN), using to check it TC and IMQ? (HTB script) I tried to mark packets, but on chain POSTROUTING this does not work... Maybe because packets fall on IMQ before signing. I tried marking it on FORWARD but packets also

Howdy, Running the most recent OVS and libvirt I'm running into the following error message with virt-install: root at qemu-kvm:~/libvirt-1.0.5#<mailto:root at qemu-kvm:~/libvirt-1.0.5#> ovs-vsctl -V ovs-vsctl (Open vSwitch) 1.11.90 Compiled May 6 2013 22:37:22 root at qemu-kvm:~/libvirt-1.0.5#<mailto:root at qemu-kvm:~/libvirt-1.0.5#> root at

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup

Hello I am using linux box as a network loadbalance router. ----------------- ------------ |LAN| - |eth0 eth1(1.1.1.2) | DSL1 ------- |DSLAM (1.1.1.1) | | eth2(1.1.1.10) | DSL2 ------- |DSLAM (1.1.1.9) | ---------------- ------------ But I have a

Hi all, I am having an issue with a multiple ISP setup. I have followed the docs online and I think I have everything setup correctly but I can get the desired traffice to go out my secondary ISP. A quick run down on what I am trying to acomplish. I want to send all sip/iax traffic out one ISP in the net zone and then send all other traffic out my secondary ISP in the dsl zone. Attached is

Hi, This problem has been tackled over and over, I know. I'm trying to understand why I'm having trouble with my "simple setup". My setup is like this: <SIP_PROVIDER>---<DSL1>---<LINUX_GATEWAY>---<ASTERISK_VIA_DSL1> I've unloaded the nf_*_sip kernel modules from the LINUX_GATEWAY just in case they could interfere. The DSL1 modem/router is a

Hello, Does someone know where can I get a patch to use ipt_time module on POSTROUTING chain ? The original patch won''t works on POSTROUTING I''ve setup my server as QoS bridge with Layer7, ipp2p so all my rules are on POSTROUTING chain ... Regards

Hi, I have two DSL line from the different provider connected to my Linux Router Firewall. Server_A is behind the Linux Router Firewall. DSL0 -- | ---- LINUX_ROUTER_FW -- SERVER_A DSL1 -- I have the following IPTABLES command to make incoming access to Server A''s web service throught port 82 as below: - $IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 82 -j DNAT

Hi, Is it possible to configure libvirt to use NFSv4 for a pool? I am doing some iptables SNATing and rpc.statd can't handle it. Thanks, Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20101014/7a771fe1/attachment.htm>

Helo to all, I am attempting to establish an IPSEC tunnel to a remote freeswan G/W with my laptop. My laptop sits in behind shorewall at home. From the documentation, this is what I Modified in Shorewall: /etc/shorewall/tunnels: ipsec loc 24.65.x.x /etc/shorewall/policy vpn loc ACCEPT loc vpn ACCEPT My question is, have I left anything out?

Gentlefolk, First, many thanks to EVERYONE that tries so hard to make this advanced routing stuff useful to the "...rest of us"! You all rock! I have been prowling the archives of this list for an answer to my problem, and have seen some close situations, but no joy. Yet. I''ve got a relatively simple setup I''m trying to get working: we''ve got a

Hello, I have the following setup on linux 2.6.32... CentOS 6.x : ipsec tunnel eth0-10.255.3.254/25 - eth1-pub add1 <-> eth1-pub add2 - eth0-10.255.5.254/25 I am trying to SNAT remote private address 10.255.5.128/25 packets when they come out of the ipsec tunnel to make it appear like it was from local address 10.255.3.254. I am doing a source ping from the right side to a device on the

Section I. Overview Hello, About a half year ago there was some rumour on bugtraq concerning a buffer overflow in Linux dynamic linkers, ld.so and ld-linux.so. You can take a look at the beginning of the thread at http://www.geek-girl.com/bugtraq/1997_3/0089.html to refresh old memories; I''ll capitalize anyway. Briefly, there exists a buffer overrun in ld-linux.so versions 1.7.14,

A most puzzling network conundrum has arisen while I was attempting to create a virtual network behind a virtual router which in turn connects the virtual network to my real network. My machine (192.168.103.23) is on the network with my router (192.168.103.1). The virtual router, tiara, has to connect my 192.168.103.* network with the virtual 10.0.0.* network which comprises two other virtual

Is it even possible or even worth while to do layer 3 switching (bridging) on a Linux system? Or would this be considered routing even though everything is done on OSI Layer 2? Which would be faster, Layer 3 switching (bridging) on OSI Layer 2 or routing on OSI Layer 3? Grant. . . .

Hello all, I have a linux machine with a SIP server (Asterisk) and 2 WAN interfaces (NATed) configured to do load balancing. I experienced problems with the SIP/RTP protocols and load balancing, because when initiating a call to an external SIP Host, a new RTP flow starts from the server to the Host, that sometimes uses another default route (due to the nexthop configuration). As i have two