similar to: Explenation of WRR parameters

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Could anyone explain what is WRR param2 [wmode2 , incr2 , decr2 , min2] for ? can i set just the param1 ? [wmode1 , incr1 , decr1,min1] -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Guys I'm desperately looking for a postfix 2.2.x SRPM. I currently use 2.1.5.. I've found these, http://ftp.wl0.org/yum/postfix/2.2/rhel4/SRPMS.postfix/ Has anyone tried them, or can anyone recommend a proper SRPM for me for Centos 4.1? Kind regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer at gmail.com Folding at home stats

Guys I''m a bit rusty and in a hurry, can anyone share with me how to prioritze TCP/ACK packets on an outgoing interface... I need these acknowledgements to get through on a congested DSL link... Thanks in advance! -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com Folding@home stats http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&username=kenneth%2Ekalmer

Dear R helpers,   I have following input files. (Actually they are more than 10 rates but here i am considering only 2 rates to write my problem)   rate1.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3           max3 1.05        1.30               1.30          1.65             1.65          1.99   rate2.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3          

hi all i want to first apollogiaze if my message will annoy you(my guess is because it will be quite large:)) i have the following situation on my hands i was recently faced with the problem of traffic shaping/bandwith limiting. my setup is(very common i guess) -internet comming in(going out) through eth0 -internet is being "shared" with the private local network via eth1. i

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

All, The CentOS Folding at Home team has cracked the top 10% of all the folding teams. We could use some more members that have CPU Cycles to spare :) Folding at Home is a great distributed computing program that is used to process items for medical research teams. It is similar to SETI at Home (if you are familiar with that). Here is info on Folding AT Home: http://folding.stanford.edu/

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Centos now has its own Folding at Home team! If you would like to learn more about what we do, please follow this <a href="http://folding.stanford.edu/">link</a> to the Folding at Home homepage. New to distributed computing?, its not a problem. Here is the simplest description: Many computers working on separate pieces of the same puzzle are faster than a few computers

Hi all, I'm demonstrating a block entry regression using R for my regression class. For each block, I get the R**2 and the associated F. I do this with separate regressions adding the next block in and then get the results by writing separate summary() statements for each regression. Is there a more convenient way to do this and also to get the change in R**2 and associated F test for

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

Attaching WRR to a hfsc ot htb class after a while i will get all packets drop and syslog full of HFSC or HTB : Non-work-conserving qdisc any ideas ? -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".

is possible to setup any bandwith resource control in a ppp0 interface? i''d like to distribute bandwith equally between pcs in a network, and inside each pc, equally between protocols... is this possible? all the documentation refers to eth0 type interfaces... so? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego

For some time now im trying to get to know what causes such configuration of QOS (kernel 2.4.25-2.4.28 + IMQ patch and ofcourse wrr): -- WRR_MAX_CLASSES=200 DEV_IN=imq0 ifconfig $DEV_IN down ifconfig $DEV_IN up tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} handle 1:0 root htb default 10 tc class add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:0 classid 1:10 htb rate 1000kbit burst 1kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:10

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Hello I have problem with wrr and more than 1300 classes when i try to add qdisc like: tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:21 handle 1000: wrr dest ip 1512 0 then i have a message like: RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory And some other problem: When I do more than 2048 filters I have message like: Classes: tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:1 classid 1:9 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 2048kbit .. tc

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Howdy all First off, thanks to Ezra & skaar (and all the other contributors) for the plugin. It''s been a great help the last couple of days. 1. I explored the trac site, and saw that commits recently have been few and far between. Is the project on the way down or is it a lack of time and resources? (Between the lines, is the next release gonna happen and will patches still be