similar to: load balance with gre/ipsec

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2 Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels. Testing show that packets travel in a single sided manner. Do I need to use the multipath (IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED) module? thx jason

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other

Hi, I have a problem with GRE tunneling. I read Advanced-Routing HOWTO about this and I did all as is written in this documentation. Even the same example is here which I need for my project. I want create (by means of GRE tunneling or IP in IP tunneling) virtual private network VPN - in first phase without IPsec in other phase with IPsec. I have two local networks distant apart with two routers.

Hello everyone, I have a problem regarding gre tunneling, I have two linux box both of them has a private network and the linux A is connected to the internet via wireless radio and the other linux B is connected to the internet via lease line. Here is the setup of my two linux box Linux A eth0 = 203.189.x.1 (internet) eth1 = 192.168.1.1 (going to hub private network) Linux B eth0 = 205.198.x.1

Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP

I need to send multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel between two Linux routers. The tunnel works for normal IP packets, but I can''t see how to make it work for multicast. Here''s the setup: 10.10.10.0/24 LAN-B--------------RtrB-------------RtrC--------------LAN-C 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 RtrB interfaces: eth0

hi all, We are using squid 25s1 with kernel 2.4.19 and iproute2(+julian''s Pathes) with the following acl.. acl short_path dst 128.0.0.0/8 tcp_outgoing_address myIp2nd short_path we are linked to 2 isp--one having satelite & the other OFC. We want the above mentioned network to go thru OFC(ispB) as the sibling resides there. But when i use squidclient mgr:server_list

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

Dear Mailing list, I have a Dovecot v2.2.9 server that authenticate against a Openldap server. I want to configure Dovecot to use TLS for LDAP authentication. I have tried to fetch/send emails using Thunderbird: - IMAP succeed to fetch mail - SMTP failed to send mail The Dovecot server produce the following log : Jun 29 08:44:00 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[634]: connect from

Hi all, I have a Linux box with two connections to the internet over two routers and a private internal network. The linux box does masquerading. internet +----------+ 172.16.0.1 +-------------------+ <---- | Router 1 |-------------------| | +----------+ | 172.16.0.2 | | | eth1

hi there, I just wanted to share a recent discovery I did on how to setup a secure VPN implementation for linux 2.4.x (I''m using 2.4.20 but it should be working, as far as documentation states, for > 2.4.18) without using FreeS/WAN. The tool (ipsec_tunnel: http://ringstrom.mine.nu/ipsec_tunnel/, by Tobias Ringström) is a kernel module based on ipip and ip_gre. It uses CyptoAPI to

Database on a remote machine res_pgsql.conf: [general] dbhost=172.16.0.2 dbport=5432 dbname=ast_config dbuser=pbx dbpass= dbsock=5432 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime Host: 172.16.0.2 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime Port: 5432 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime User: pbx [Nov 28

First of all, I''d like to thank Andy Furniss for his direction and for helping me get a working example up and running. For the following set up to work, you will need a linux computer at the ISP (server), a linux computer at the client location (client), and some a public range of IP''s you plan to send down to your client. (as this configuration involves patching the linux

For reasons unknown, any connections to localhost -- tcp, icmp, or udp -- are all originating from my external interface, rl0: $ telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Can't assign requested address telnet: Unable to connect to remote host IPFW log: Jul 16 12:46:43 octo ipfw: 100 Accept TCP 192.168.1.119:1434 127.0.0.1:25 out via rl0

Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the

Hello everyone, can someone please tell me if the configuration previously shown is eventually going to work? Stefano Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 18:56 Stefano Vargiu < vstefanoxx at gmail.com> ha scritto: > I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, > specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only > with their VPN

Le mar. 15 janv. 2019 à 03:13, Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> a écrit : > Hello Julien, > > > Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:15:47 +0100 > schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > > > > ** Test 1 ** > > On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3' > > When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I