similar to: routing pb? ping not "emerging"

Hello newsgroup, I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with the problem I have. The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing, multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one private ip range. I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working. The default route is via

I'm not sure if this even SHOULD work. I can't find anything really useful in the documentation. I have a RedHat 7.3 system in the DMZ of our network, its address is 192.168.222.10, broadcast address is 192.168.222.254 I firewall, linux based with 3 ports, the 192.168.222.0 net (DMZ), the "outside world" on one port and the internal network is 192.168.111.0, broadcasting

Here is the report and the complete diagram. And sorry for email problem and incomplete email ! I have made new test. Eth0 and eth2 are bridged. I can ping NET from LAN I can ping every firewall''s interface from LAN I can ping eth1 from private LAN I can ping everything from firewall Bridging is activated in shorewall.conf >From LAN i can ping 192.168.11.253 but not 192.168.11.254

I recently couldn't connect to a windowXP domain share from a winXP client.(Samba is the PDC) When I attempted to mount the share from the samba server this is the error I got. colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount //buckwheat/share buckwheat/ Password: 6586: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnomem (Insufficient server memory to perform the requested function.) colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount

hi all, I have a firewall with 2 gateways. Router A (main, adsl), router I (backup, isdn). In case of failure of adsl I switch to isdn. How can I know when it is time to go back? Which is a standard way to test the adsl line? TIA sandro -- Sandro Dentella *:-) e-mail: sandro@e-den.it http://www.tksql.org TkSQL Home page - My GPL work

Hello. I'm in need of some help to shed some light on a strange problem. The box is running Samba 4.1.7 on FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 and I suspect (though I'm not sure) all troubles started after the upgrade from 4.1.6. The setup is quite simple: no AD, no LDAP, only one server. A command as simple as "smbclient -U user //SERVER/SHARE", if fired up several times in a row on the

I already setup several 2 gateways boxes, with rules too decide which lan should use which gateway. Now I''m stuck with a simpler problem. At home I was just making some experimental setup: * 1 adsl (ppp0) * 1 more tables in rt_tables (200 ping) called "bluff" * table ''bluff *has not* a default route root@fw-eden root # ip ro li table bluff

I made a script to test if in a moultiple gateway setup all default connection are up, regardless of the fact that that gateway is the default gw. Suppose adsl1 and adsl2 are present, and all traffic goes by default to adsl1, and you want to test if adsl2 is ok. 1. I use mangles from iptables to mark icmp packets to some test machines 2. I set up a routing table for each adsl 3. I use

OK, maybe the message was too long... how can I debug why a packet (eg: icmp reply) that arrives to my box (tcpdump shows it) and does not show up to ping even if it is: a. destined to my box b. is not dropped by iptables I strongly suspect it is a routing problem, since I only have this if I define more routing tables. So I think you are the guys/gurus that can help me...

Yes thank you for answering so fast ! I have corrected it, here the new diagram and the new routing table. But it still doesn''t work. >From the router i can access to 192.168.11.254 I have add the rules : DNAT loc priv:192.168.11.254:22 tcp 22 But i can''t connect to 192.168.11.254 from LAN The DNAT fonction doesn''t work, but i can DROP packet arriving on eth0 (loc)

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp

Sorry some email problem, i have change it for more reliable one. I have try this morning to netmasq 192.168.11.0 (eth1) to 192.168.1.0 (eth0), but it is a mistake. Yes thank you for answering so fast ! I have corrected it, here the new diagram and the new routing table. But it still doesn''t work. From the router i can access to 192.168.11.254 I have add the rules : DNAT loc

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

I wrote it wrong here Sorry about that.. They are of course .255 . :-) -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] F?r David van Geyn Skickat: den 25 maj 2002 15:27 Till: anders@norrbring.biz; samba@lists.samba.org ?mne: Re: [Samba] Trouble browsing on different nets. I believe your broadcast addresses on the linux box are set

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

I have a working router (thanks to Julian''s patches and the threads on this site) load balancing over Dual ISP''s. Links for the curious (see router setup below as well) - Necessary Patches - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ How to Patch (I use Debian Sarge and downloaded the latest source from kernel.org) - http://www.desktop-linux.net/debkernel.htm Necessary Reading -

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Holger Baust wrote: > Hello. > > We are using pxelinux for years to boot Linux via PXE since years. > Since EFI is spreading, I changed configuration to be able to boot EFI > systems. > > The "Client": > - HP Proliant DL380Gen9 System FW: 1.21 11/03/2014, latest available > - NIC used for booting: HP Embedded LOM 331i

Hello. We are using pxelinux for years to boot Linux via PXE since years. Since EFI is spreading, I changed configuration to be able to boot EFI systems. The "Client": - HP Proliant DL380Gen9 System FW: 1.21 11/03/2014, latest available - NIC used for booting: HP Embedded LOM 331i (Broadcom BCM 5719/ tg3), FW: 5719-v1.38 The Server: - ISC-DHCP with tfpd-hpa running on Debian 6.x -

Hi, here my system on shorewall: eth0 192.168.108.1 net eth1 192.168.109.1 dmz eth2 192.168.110.1 loc_110 eth3 192.168.111.1 loc I haven''t access from or to server in loc_110 through shorewall. I can use ssh or other types from loc to dmz or from loc to fw, but I can''t use connections to loc_110. I can also use ssh - connection from fw to loc_110 or redirectly. Where is the