similar to: Large file uploads - performance improvement

Hello all, For the last couple of days I was trying to get my Apache/mod_proxy/mongrel setup to limit the size of the request body. The setup is as follows: 1.) Apache acts as a reverse proxy by facilitating mod_rewrite and mod_proxy 2.) Requests for non-static files are passed on to a mongrel_cluster 3.) We use mongrel for our Ruby on Rails application Note that due to some restrictions we are

I''ve got a RoR app that will be going to production soon (in the next month or so) and would like to get some feedback on what kind of web server setup people have had good luck with. I''m looking for something that is: 1. Stable 2. Easy to setup 3. Secure (sorry but Windows is ruled out here) My deployment will either be on Fedora Core 5 or possible Mac OS X Server.

My personal showdown: Using Ruby on Rails: I was pretty productive right away. Documentation though for the Rails APIs and stuff is not as good as I''m use to in Perl (particulariy CPAN). No being critical, just saying the Rails documentation left me hanging more than once and guessing as to what I was doing wrong. Production deployment is a bit much. I''ve found using

I''m in the planning stage of an app that will store images and short video clips approximately 1 meg in size from user uploads. My partner wants to use the database to store all of the files, mainly for scaling purposes. I recently built a similar app using the filesystem, but that was to be run from a single machine. This new app will have 3 application servers and a fileserver

Hi, This message might be helpful for people who is using or plan to use LiteSpeed web server together with Rails. We posted two tutorials in our WIKI regarding Rails + LiteSpeed configuration. One is Rails + LiteSpeed API, another one is mongrel + LiteSpeed proxy. http://www.litespeedtech.com/community/wiki/doku.php?id=litespeed_wiki:ruby_rails

I''d like to use Mongrel_cluster with SSL on a green-field application (it can be configured however is best - initially, "ease of setup" is important, but then soon after will be scaling and response time). I''ve read a lot of emails on this topic, and checked out the Mongrel pages, etc, but I''m left with this question of what is recommended: For a

Happy RailsDay! While everyone else was out having fun with RailsDay I spent my time wisely and wrote up tons of documentation for Mongrel and cleaned out some of the docs I''ll never write anyway. I also took the time to apply some nice patches from Jonas Pfenniger for easily setting up redirects in Mongrel. Some of the highlighted documents people will be interested in are: *

When using file upload with Safari and Litespeed server it often get stuck and it looks like it''s loading but nothing happens. What could be wrong? Firefox is better. Also IE 7. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

Is there a memory leak in asterisk 1.4? The other day with asterisk 1.4.0 I noticed that top was reporting a RES of 106 meg for the asterisk process. Restarting the process brought it down to more like 4 meg, but it grew over time to be 20+. So yesterday morning I upgraded to 1.4.4 in case this is something that had been addressed. Again I started with a RES of like 4meg or so, but this

Hello everyone, I''ve got an app where I need to give the user the facility to upload a large-ish (up to maybe 10Mb) CSV file. I really don''t want to have to deal with idiots uploading porn, /dev/zero, and whatever else they feel I might appreciate - I want to eliminate everything that isn''t a valid CSV file as quickly as possible in the upload process. It''ll

Hi mongrel-users, Just a heads up for apache2.2 mod_proxy + mongrel + rails users: If you have a line like this in your source (because you''ve done a poor job maintaining your code and reading the API docs): render ''foo'', :layout => ''bar'' You might expect it to do what it says... but it actually sets deprecated_status and ends up setting

Hi, First, my thanks to Zed for including LiteSpeed in cgi.rb vulnerability report. Appreciated! I just got time to review ruby-lsapi code and test the vulnerability against LiteSpeed. I found that, in our latest ruby-lsapi release 1.11, lsapi_read() function returns Qnil when the end of request body has been reached. So, in theory, LiteSpeed should not be vulnerable to this attack. Our test

Right now you can use either Pens/Balance/Pound to put in front of some Mongrels and it works really good (easy to setup too!). I got to thinking, would it be possible to mimic what Pens/Balance/Pound does in pure Ruby (yeah, I know the answer is yes)? I guess I''m looking for a starting point. Does one simply write an HTTP listener that then redirects the calls to Mongrel? Is

We have a Centos server with a number of virtual hosts, and my rails app runs under one of those virtual hosts using mongrel_rails. The app lives in /home/mydomain/railsapp where /home/mydomain/railsapp/public is the rails root. It runs under mongrel on port 8008, so to get to it users invoke the url http://www.mydomain.com:8008/ - all is fine to this point. Now I have some users whose

Hello, I''m trying to install the upload_progress gem and i can''t see the upload progress status. My config is : apache2 with mod_proxy mongrel rails upload.rb : ############## require ''rubygems'' require ''drb'' require ''gem_plugin'' GemPlugin::Manager.instance.load ''mongrel'' => GemPlugin::INCLUDE

I am trying to gain an understanding of R's capabilities in larger data set analysis. I really like R, but the datasets that I normally work with are in the 15m-50m range, sometimes much larger. The size owes to observations, not extraneous variables, so little can be done to "clean" the data of unnecessary elements. (i.e. database storage or external data manipulation doesn't

Hi, I am glad to announce that Ruby LSAPI extension 1.4 is released, in this release we mainly addressed two issues, one is that a worker process does not remain persistent if a request has been canceled in the middle, this is addressed in 1.4. Another one is that process manager may create a lot more worker processes than the value configured when there were too many canceled requests, which

What is the absolute path on the server that /mycompanyStore/images/ is store in? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Tim Dunphy Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 10:12 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error Hey guys, Sorry for the failed attempts at

We have a large bitcode file produced from a tool. It's about 23 meg. When we compile this with llc, the footprint is 4-7 gig depending on which target. On a desktop this is not such a problem but it is on mobile devices. The suspect is that the flow graph for the entire program is built and kept for the duration, even if no optimization needing it all is in progress. This would make us

Hi, I''m currently helping out with a large scale rails application deployment. The idea is to have an apache 2.2 with mod_proxy serving out to a farm of mongrels distributed on N number of servers. We''ll also have some Starfish nodes doing processor intensive tasks distributed on N number of servers as well. I was wondering if anyone had any experience of managing and