similar to: Question on Routing Tables

Hi. The task: 1. There 3 servers and a router with 2 PPPoE connections (let call them: ppp0, ppp1). 2. There are several groups of Inet-clients to be served (Servers, Clients and Club). 3. The task is: - to route Club through the ppp1; - to Servers and Clients through ppp0; (Next is reproduced from memory and may be slightly incorrect) router # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table

Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #

Dear all, First please excuse me for my very bad english. I''m curently setting up a gateway (linux 2.6.7) with load balancing ( multipath ). I access them from lan and my external interfaces are NATed. I''m used iproute2 as described in the LARTC and nano howto. My problem is that connections are well balanced but often, long connection are break because the default route

Hi all I am a newbie to routing and I have a problem. I am trying to setup a Load Balanced router with the help of Advanced Routing and iproute2. I came across netsane script(http://muse.linuxmafia.org/netsane/) and Christopher Simon''s nano how to which told me some basic steps to do so. As i follwed these I ran into a few questions and problems. 1. Is it possible that I have no default

Hi all, I have a question about the Linux kernel/IP stack support for multiple routing tables (or FIBs) that I am hoping someone can answer. This support is also used by the iproute2 package that is available. My question is: For applications sending raw packets, is it possible to specify the routing table to use when sending? Currently, I am finding that calls to sendmsg() use the main

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

Hello, I am writing a routing daemon that is able to assign different gateways to a destination address for different classes of service. Multiple DiffServ Code Point values are mapped into a single class of service. I have accomplished this by using the iptables MARK target to label each packet with a class of service value and then using ''ip rule add fwmark'' to have each

List members; I have been reading the digest for some time now and I would like to ask some conceptual questions. I am a telecommunications systems designer and not a software guy, but I have tried and used a number of the tools availabel in the LARTC and Iptables, and many of the other great things included in Linux. We are designing commercial products and I don''t want to ask my

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

In its current configuration one of our Linux boxes has 2 DSL modems that connect to the same service provider. On the router packets coming in from the network destined for the internet are marked alternating using nth match those packets are supposed to be picked up by iproute2 and routed out the physical connections based on that mark, thereby doubling the outbound bandwidth. The problem is

Hi all; I have a custom iproute2 table and a few rules to go along with it (CentOS 5) -- I have added the table to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. if-up and friends doesn't seem to handle this real gracefully. How are those of you out there doing something similar managing this customization? I don't really want to muck with /etc/init.d/network or the if-up scripts to avoid breaking upgrades.

Hi, How do I configure my routing file to handle the following condition: www.my-domain.com --> "Web site under construction" page www.my-domain.com/beta/ --> The actual beta application In the normal case when I access "www.my-domain.com/beta/" the application works fine but the redirects go the root and fails. How can I make sure the "redirects" goes to

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hi, I'm working with the iproute2/iptables toolset on my CentOS4 server to create custom routing rules. However, I'm a bit at a loss how to create these permanently so that they are automatically reloaded upon reboot of the server. I know that iptables has a config file in /etc/sysconfig/iptables that is loaded by /etc/init.d/iptables startup script. Is there anything that works

Hi, How do I associate two different tables which have a lookup id (table) as common. I tried the has_many :table2, :through => look_up_table in my table1 model. Any hints? Thanks, Hari -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello all, Does anyone know of a methodology to build a route based on the inbound and outbound interfaces as opposed to ip addresses? We are essentially trying to forward packets from one interface to another without looking at the ip address. Bridging (brctl, br2684ctl) will not work in this case as the interfaces use different layer 2 encapsulation (e.g., atm0<=>eth0, or

Hello, LARTC! I''ve been having troubles with load balance with ip + fwmark. I was wondering if these points are mandatory for this scheme to work: 1. Is there any problem if the linux gateway has a default gateway? Do I have to remove it? 2. In the scenario with 4 NICs, one routing table each, and another routing table doing load balance, Do the tables that imply routes that are being

Hi, I have a simple question (well, at least I think it''s simple!). I have a router, with four Ethernet cards; eth0-eth3. eth0 and eth3 are the ''external'' cards, connecting to my ISPs. eth1 and eth2 are connected to my internal networks. What I want to do is basically filter all the traffic from one card to another, in this configuration: eth1 to eth3 eth2 to eth0