similar to: HTB problem running on VLAN, not working

I am wanting to verify that I am properly using the MASQ for a series of hosts. I have 2 providers, and my providers file has the contents: #NAME NUMBER MARK DUPLICATE INTERFACE GATEWAY OPTIONS COPY l3 1 100 main eth0.100 1.18.139.1 track,loose,fallback eth1 ws 2 200 main eth0.101 1.155.136.193

Hi Rahul, If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you might want to have a look at this: --- (From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html <http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> ) How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port? Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.

Hi, I want to add 2 vlans by the following steps: 1. add the vlan interfaces: vconfig add eth0 100 --vlan100 vconfig add eth0 101 --vlan101 2. modify the network-bridge script by the websit, http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-04ebcc1760dbc4678e83b116afa310dc0612dc39 Comment each time ifup or ifdown commands are executed.The reason is that ifdown ends with

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine running 2.6.18-rc3 with a bridge config that looks like this: cr1:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces vlan100 36b0.0007e90f40c1 yes eth0.100 eth2.100 vlan101 5dc0.0007e90f40c1 yes

Hi, everyone I has a ADSL link about 4M bandwidth, and use HTB do bandwidth management. When I config qdisc like below: tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4000kbit tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit prio 0 tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 4000kbit

Package: src:xen-api Severity: wishlist I've tried to configure VLAN using XCP + openvswitch using Wheezy, though it's still not fully working, I think VLAN configuration on dom0 can be better documented. It's fair easy to configure VLAN in Debian. First you need to ensure that your physical switch is in trunk mode, which means it will pass all kinds of VLAN tagged network flow, and

Hi Every time I up a VM with Xen 3.0.3 on CentOS 5.4 I get this messages on kernel: Apr 5 09:03:07 zebra kernel: BUG: warning at lib/kref.c:32/kref_get() (Not tainted) Apr 5 09:03:07 zebra kernel: Apr 5 09:03:07 zebra kernel: Call Trace: Apr 5 09:03:07 zebra kernel: [<ffffffff8023824d>] kref_get+0x38/0x3d Apr 5 09:03:07 zebra kernel: [<ffffffff8025a440>] kobject_get+0x12/0x17

Hello All, Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just work" out of the box? (I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.) I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't be written... Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains

Hi, all! Can I enable multicasting via shorewall? I have router with Gentoo Linux (one interface to ISP, one with alises - to local network). Shorewall work perfect! But now I need setup Quagga (zebra) for dynamic routing between one more router via another provider. All routers daemons (zebra, ripd, ospf) used multicasting. In my configuration already enabled allowBcast and etc.

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Hi list, My network was assigned a private AS and my ISP(4) urged me to use BGP ! My Other 3 providers on my Shorewall BOX are typical aDSL lines while the 4th is an 1G optical uplink with 64 addresses. Currently I am in a balance, track mode in shorewall ISP setup.. After I installed - configured and started zebra + bgp my static routing tables got filled with about 850 static routes to

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hi @ all, I wamnt to combine two dataframes including a condition. I have two dataframes like the following: animal<-c("bear","bear","lion","monkey","fish","monkey","bear","zebra","zebra") val<-c(2,42,67,5,12,9,87,1,12)

Hi, I''ve got 2 lines from two diffrent ISP''s, one is a leased line and another a DSL line, I route certain ips over the DSL line for faster access and would like email to go over the leased line as it has a static ip and is our sending mailserver ip I would like to send mail to the same ips that is routed over DSL via the leased line, otherwise my server gets blacklisted with

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

I have, for the time being, decided to split my dual ISP/single shorewall connection into two shorewall connections/boxes, each handling one ISP. I am running OSPF in the network and so far things are working out fairly well (from a client of the two gateways). $ ip route ls 10.33.66.2 via 10.75.22.199 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 20 192.168.200.1 via 10.75.22.254 dev eth0 proto zebra metric