similar to: General question

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

I have a linux server connecto into a 100mps LAN, i use iptables implementation of shorewall (shorewall.net) and then I used the wondershaper. When I adjusted the values below, I got a download speed for vsftp at a whooping 1187.91 KB/s but a upload speed is only a painful 27 KB/s. I dont fully understand the underpinng codes behind the wondershaper htb stuff. can someone guide me on how can i

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m using HTB to shape my outgoing traffic over a ADSL-link with PPPoE with a nominal bandwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve low lantency. If there are some big packets going over the wire, everything works fine. But if there are

Hi, I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following order: cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30. Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty. However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are de queued not to what flowid they belong to. If I

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with

I currently have a 6mbit DSL line with a /28 block of static IP numbers. My DSL modem is in bridge mode, so I do not have a router. Because I dont want to put all my machines directly on the internet without some kind of firewall, I put a Linux machine between my DSL modem and my LAN, like this, DSL Modem --> eth0 Linux bridge/firewall/shaper eth1 --> LAN I need more bandwidth though

hello, I have working htb system with about 1000 users. Until now I reload all rules at change, but it take too much time to apply. I cannot delete applyed filters. There is rules for one user: #!/bin/bash -v # Download shaper EX -> 2:20 /sbin/tc class add dev eth2 parent 2:20 classid 2:1775 htb rate 8000Kbit ceil 10000Kbit quantum 1514 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth2 parent 2:1775 sfq perturb

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

Hello, I''ve been using a TCNG-based traffic shaper for about a year and a half now to manage bandwidth usage of a number of our fiber and wireless customers, and it''s always worked extremely well. Right now though, I''m finding myself with a problem I''m not sure how to solve properly: We also provide colocation hosting for several of those clients, and

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

I have packet shaping set up with "The Wonder Shaper" tcstart file. I thoroughly tested upload and download performance with bittorrent and the following config was the best: DOWNLINK=425 UPLINK=3450 DEV=ath0 The main problem is that browsing is sluggish, but ssh is a bit sluggish too. Bittorrent performance is great though. My bittorrent client is set to listen on port 6881 so I

hi i recently searched in the mailinglist archive and found similar problems, whose solutions helped very much, thank you. i have the following scenario: a firewall with one lan interface eth0 10.1.1.1/24 and two uplink interfaces eth1 10.2.2.1/24 eth2 10.3.3.1/24 each uplink interface does SNAT: iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to-source 10.2.2.1 iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING

Hello guys, I am experiencing a strange behaviour with HTB. Here is my situation: Test PC -------- internet ------------- ISP ----- fiber connection --------- (eht2) RT1 (eth1) --------- wireless connection ------------ (eth4) RT2 (eth0) -------- users RT1 - Slackware router RT2 - Slackware router Delay between Test PC and ISP is approx 450 ms. I have the following shapers

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi, I am connected to two DSL providers (DSL 1 - 1Mbps downlink/384kbps uplink and DSL 2 - 2Mbps downlink/512kpbs uplink) I would like to only allow ftp, pop3 and http via the DSL 1 and only smtp, ipsec and pptp via DSL 2. How can I do so? Can I use iproute to route these protocols? Below is my ip routing: - # DSL 1 ip route add 2.2.2.208/30 dev eth0 src 2.2.2.210 table 1 ip route add