similar to: qdisc prio problem

hi, i'm using suse 7.3 with samba 2.2.8 as PDC and openldap for authentification in network with wfw-, winnt-, w2k-clients. everything works fine. because not every client has the same configuration (same progs, same path's, hardware...), i got problems, if a user dosn't login from his ordinary workstation, his roaming-profile doesn't work fine. now, how can i force users only

Hello, is it possible that the number of bands for the PRIO qdisc is limited to 16? tc qdisc add dev $DEVICE root handle 1: prio bands 16 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 succeeds but tc qdisc add dev $DEVICE root handle 1: prio bands 17 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 returns: ''RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument'' Is there any possibility to raise the

Hi all, I have seen many posts on the Shorewalllists dealing with H323. Although lots of them indicated that this is difficult process with kernelrecompilation etc. I just tried what seemed to be logical for me. Surprisingly it worked. Configuration: WS1 ----- FW ------ Internet ------- WS2/Shorewall WS1, FW and WS2 run Redhat9 with its standardkernel 2.4.20. FW and WS2 run Shorewall

Hi, I''m trying to set up 15 different delay intervals for packets leaving on an interface, using netems hanging off of a 16-band prio. I''m having trouble adding anything to bands higher than 10. Here''s what I tried: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 16 \ priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I want all default traffic to go to

Hello Mailing list, I have a problem with the prio qdisc and I don´t know what is wrong in my configuration This ist a sample configuration and looks like this: #include "fields.tc" #include "ports.tc" #define X16(i) i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i dev ppp0 { dsmark { prio(bands 6, priomap X16($be)) { class if ip_proto == IPPROTO_UDP;

I have two linux machines and a W2K box. I am going to upgrade the linux boxes SuSE 9.2 this coming weekend. The one box (WS 1) will be acting as a distrubuted 'server' for files/applications and a impact printer. The other linux box (WS2) will be my primary workstation. The W2K box will be used by other memebers of the family. I want to use WS1 as a Samba server and be able to share

Hi, New to Samba & this list, so please forgive if I make a faux pas. I've got a Redhat 7.3 box with Samba, & 2 Win stations, called "ws1" & "ws2". When either station creates files on the server, all the files get created with permissions of rw-r--r-- (644). How do I get them created with 777? ws1 & ws2 are both set up as entries in the /etc/passwd file

Hi, all I am interested in Linux related QoS, especially PRIO queue discipline (qdisc). I test some experiments about PRIO qdisc. Host A ------ Router A --- Router B --- Host C | 1Gbps | Host B ---------+ +-------- Host D flow 1 : Host A -> Host C (TCP) flow 2 : Host B -> Host D (UDP) priority 1 queue (pfifo, size 1000 packets ) : flow 1 priority 2

I have a very simple test setup of 2 servers each working as a glusterfs-server and glusterfs-client to the other in an afr capacity. The gluster-c and gluster-s both start up with no errors and are handshaking properly.. One one server, I get the expected behaviour: I touch a file in the export dir and it magically appears in the others mount point. On the other server however, the file

Hi, Sorry to bother you all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have 3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to 960kbits. I have a test setup where I can pump 600kbit of high priority sustained and I have 400kbit of low priority traffic sustained. I

Hello all, I might make a fool out of me, but I think the prio qdisc doesn''t work as advertised in any document I could lay my hands on. The following tests and observations were made with Linux kernel 2.6.20.21. This makes it up-to-date in the 2.6.20.x kernel family. My problem was that the link quality reported by the olsr.org olsrd degraded depending on the amount of payload

Hi! I''m studying load balancing and fault tolerance using multiple WAN interfaces. I follow the howto in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt but the problem is that faults detected are limited only in link between lan gateway and modem/router adsl, and none about adsl signal. Someone can tell me another howto about fault tolerance using a different method? (that solve my problem) I know

Hi, I have a router/firewall running Linux (like the most of you) and I wanted to do some traffic control. I''ve created an root PRIO qdisc like the example in paragraph 9.5.3.1 (http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN903) with three SFQ child-classes. I wanted for interactive (ssh, telnet, ftp-control) and dns-traffic to be placed in the first queue, http should go in

Hi, I've a problem with "logon script" parameter: client doesn't run this script and i've no error in samba logs. I'm using samba 3.0.24 (etch) with windows XP SP2 client side. workstation was joined in domain and user login (using roaming profiles) is executed without errors. I used unix2dos tool to transform the script in dos way and if I run the script in widows with

Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1

Hello everybody, sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I''m stuck. I''m living in a student''s foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard PRIO solution (as I promised to someone that group X will only use the link capacity which isn''t used by group Y). I could make a

Today I''ve noticed a bit strange (?) behaviour when prio qdisc is used. Example (having no filters/qdisc/etc. at the start) : Add simple 9 bands qdisc, set each mapping to lowest priority band: tc qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 9 priomap 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 If I do just that, all is fine - whole traffic ends in 9th band, what can easily be verified by tc -s

Hi! I'm looking for a way to disable a directory shared. I think that I can set null valid users parameter but I would know if a boolean parameter exists. Thanks, Fabio -- Dott. Fabio Marcone 2T srl Telefono +39 - 0871- 540154 Fax +39 - 0871- 571594 Indirizzo Viale B. Croce 573, 66013 Chieti Scalo (CH)

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

ciao a tutti, sto provando ad installare samba + openldap su centos. ho un problema: quando cerco di aggiungere un privilegio ad un gruppo ho il seguente errore: [2007/11/22 17:55:48, 1] lib/smbldap_util.c:add_new_domain_account_policies(77) add_new_domain_account_policies: failed to add account policies to dn= sambaDomainName=2TSAMBA2,dc=duet,dc=it with: Undefined attribute type f