similar to: qdisc prio problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "qdisc prio problem"

2003 Nov 07
2
samba + user/host authentification
hi, i'm using suse 7.3 with samba 2.2.8 as PDC and openldap for authentification in network with wfw-, winnt-, w2k-clients. everything works fine. because not every client has the same configuration (same progs, same path's, hardware...), i got problems, if a user dosn't login from his ordinary workstation, his roaming-profile doesn't work fine. now, how can i force users only
2007 Aug 22
4
Limited number of bands in PRIO qdisc
Hello, is it possible that the number of bands for the PRIO qdisc is limited to 16? tc qdisc add dev $DEVICE root handle 1: prio bands 16 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 succeeds but tc qdisc add dev $DEVICE root handle 1: prio bands 17 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 returns: ''RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument'' Is there any possibility to raise the
2007 Apr 02
1
Please Help: Can''t access bands > 10 on prio qdisc
Hi, I''m trying to set up 15 different delay intervals for packets leaving on an interface, using netems hanging off of a 16-band prio. I''m having trouble adding anything to bands higher than 10. Here''s what I tried: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 16 \ priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I want all default traffic to go to
2007 Apr 25
0
problem with prio qdisc and tcng
Hello Mailing list, I have a problem with the prio qdisc and I donĀ“t know what is wrong in my configuration This ist a sample configuration and looks like this: #include "fields.tc" #include "ports.tc" #define X16(i) i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i dev ppp0 { dsmark { prio(bands 6, priomap X16($be)) { class if ip_proto == IPPROTO_UDP;
2004 Sep 05
6
Solution: H323, Gnomemeeting, Netmeeting
Hi all, I have seen many posts on the Shorewalllists dealing with H323. Although lots of them indicated that this is difficult process with kernelrecompilation etc. I just tried what seemed to be logical for me. Surprisingly it worked. Configuration: WS1 ----- FW ------ Internet ------- WS2/Shorewall WS1, FW and WS2 run Redhat9 with its standardkernel 2.4.20. FW and WS2 run Shorewall
2006 Jun 21
1
Linux Qos : PRIO qdisc works
Hi, all I am interested in Linux related QoS, especially PRIO queue discipline (qdisc). I test some experiments about PRIO qdisc. Host A ------ Router A --- Router B --- Host C | 1Gbps | Host B ---------+ +-------- Host D flow 1 : Host A -> Host C (TCP) flow 2 : Host B -> Host D (UDP) priority 1 queue (pfifo, size 1000 packets ) : flow 1 priority 2
2004 Oct 25
0
Best method for this?
I have two linux machines and a W2K box. I am going to upgrade the linux boxes SuSE 9.2 this coming weekend. The one box (WS 1) will be acting as a distrubuted 'server' for files/applications and a impact printer. The other linux box (WS2) will be my primary workstation. The W2K box will be used by other memebers of the family. I want to use WS1 as a Samba server and be able to share
2007 Nov 26
1
prio qdisc broken?
Hello all, I might make a fool out of me, but I think the prio qdisc doesn''t work as advertised in any document I could lay my hands on. The following tests and observations were made with Linux kernel 2.6.20.21. This makes it up-to-date in the 2.6.20.x kernel family. My problem was that the link quality reported by the olsr.org olsrd degraded depending on the amount of payload
2005 May 10
1
Help with PRIO qdisc and filters
Hi, Sorry to bother you all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have 3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to 960kbits. I have a test setup where I can pump 600kbit of high priority sustained and I have 400kbit of low priority traffic sustained. I
2003 Feb 06
2
Novice question
Hi, New to Samba & this list, so please forgive if I make a faux pas. I've got a Redhat 7.3 box with Samba, & 2 Win stations, called "ws1" & "ws2". When either station creates files on the server, all the files get created with permissions of rw-r--r-- (644). How do I get them created with 777? ws1 & ws2 are both set up as entries in the /etc/passwd file
2004 Oct 20
1
LARTC problems with PRIO qdisc
Hi, I have a router/firewall running Linux (like the most of you) and I wanted to do some traffic control. I''ve created an root PRIO qdisc like the example in paragraph 9.5.3.1 (http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN903) with three SFQ child-classes. I wanted for interactive (ssh, telnet, ftp-control) and dns-traffic to be placed in the first queue, http should go in
2008 Nov 20
1
My ignorance and Fuse (or glusterfs)
I have a very simple test setup of 2 servers each working as a glusterfs-server and glusterfs-client to the other in an afr capacity. The gluster-c and gluster-s both start up with no errors and are handshaking properly.. One one server, I get the expected behaviour: I touch a file in the export dir and it magically appears in the others mount point. On the other server however, the file
2001 Jun 26
1
prio fighting
Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1
2005 Feb 02
8
can''t understand strange PRIO behaviour
Hello everybody, sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I''m stuck. I''m living in a student''s foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard PRIO solution (as I promised to someone that group X will only use the link capacity which isn''t used by group Y). I could make a
2007 Aug 28
2
prio bands and ignored priomap when any tc filter is present
Today I''ve noticed a bit strange (?) behaviour when prio qdisc is used. Example (having no filters/qdisc/etc. at the start) : Add simple 9 bands qdisc, set each mapping to lowest priority band: tc qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 9 priomap 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 If I do just that, all is fine - whole traffic ends in 9th band, what can easily be verified by tc -s
2004 May 08
2
PRIO qdisc with HTB
Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class
2007 May 03
1
logon script problem
Hi, I've a problem with "logon script" parameter: client doesn't run this script and i've no error in samba logs. I'm using samba 3.0.24 (etch) with windows XP SP2 client side. workstation was joined in domain and user login (using roaming profiles) is executed without errors. I used unix2dos tool to transform the script in dos way and if I run the script in widows with
2006 Apr 07
0
PRIO and u32 matching problem
Hi to everybody I''m trying to use PRIO qdisc to prioritize the traffic but i have strange problem maybe I''m missing sometging. First i add root qdisc like this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio it''s fine after this i try to match traffic by tos field but i get error invalid match tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip tos 0x10 0xff
2006 Mar 23
1
load balancing and fault tolerance in networking
Hi! I''m studying load balancing and fault tolerance using multiple WAN interfaces. I follow the howto in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt but the problem is that faults detected are limited only in link between lan gateway and modem/router adsl, and none about adsl signal. Someone can tell me another howto about fault tolerance using a different method? (that solve my problem) I know
2005 Apr 26
2
disabled share
Hi! I'm looking for a way to disable a directory shared. I think that I can set null valid users parameter but I would know if a boolean parameter exists. Thanks, Fabio -- Dott. Fabio Marcone 2T srl Telefono +39 - 0871- 540154 Fax +39 - 0871- 571594 Indirizzo Viale B. Croce 573, 66013 Chieti Scalo (CH)