similar to: prio, kernel 2.6: patch?

Hi everybody!! I'm trying to assign boolean values to a column in a matrix depending on the number of times present in another column. I have no clue, I have been 2 days looking for a way, if somebody knows what kind of functions I need to use I will really apreciate it. example: Color Type Mark1 Mark2 Mark3 Red high 139 P alpha blue low 140 P alpha Green high

Dear R users The following question looks simple but I have spend alot of time to solve it. I would highly appeciate your help. I have following dataset from family dataset : Here we have individuals and their two parents and their marker scores (marker1, marker2,....and so on). 0 means that their parent information not available. Individual Parent1 Parent2 mark1 mark2 1 0 0

Asterisk apparently has five echo cancellation algorithms: STEVE, STEVE2, MARK, MARK2 and MARK3. The current default appears to be MARK2. My question is, has anyone had any experience with any of the others (other than MARK2), and is there some conventional wisdom as to when to use one over another? TIA Bruce Komito High Sierra Networks, Inc. www.servers-r-us.com (775) 236-5815

Hello, I''d like to build a 4 class prio system based on mark (until now no problem), but with a limited bandwidth. I have configured my eth* to be 10mbit full duplex, and I''d like to limit the bandwidth to 1mbit. I managed to do it with a policy filter matching all the traffic, but I can redirect it into only one class, so all my prio classes are useless. I also tried to limit

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Andrew > Kohlsmith > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:23 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best echo canceller? > > > On Thursday 29 September 2005 17:04, Claudio Canseco wrote: >

hi! In your experience what is the best choice for echo canceller ? Which one should work better: STEVE, STEVE2, MARK, MARK2, MARK3, KB1 ? Regards, Claudio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050929/f556bf91/attachment.htm

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

hi i tried the example given on the examples page to duplicate selected traffic like tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 3: netem duplicate 40% tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 3 u32 match ip dst 11.0.2.2 flowid 1:3 when i ping from 11.0.2.2 to this interface my machine hangs. the same thing works for drop or delay. i would

Hello everybody, sorry for bothering you, but after some hours, I''m stuck. I''m living in a student''s foundation where I want to connect lots of people to a tiny DSL link. We have exactly four types of traffic. We want a really hard PRIO solution (as I promised to someone that group X will only use the link capacity which isn''t used by group Y). I could make a

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Hi I have now my outgoing traffic shaped whith root qdisc htb (where i configure basic rate) and tc prio (as a leaf with 4 classes) where i can set priority of different kinds of traffic. It works but htb is work-conserving so packets are only delayed (when the rate is exceeded), while i want them dropped. In the case when rate is exceeded i want to drop packets with priority set to 4, then if

Hi all, I''ve not been able to find an explanation of the relationship between prio and rate as they apply to the HTB technique. Hopefully someone on here will be able to help me. As I understand things, when prio values are assigned to an HTB setup, classes with a given prio value will only be serviced when there are no packets waiting in classes with a lower prio value. Now, does

Hello, I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which goes: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs) and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too much, I gradually increased

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

Hi, I''m looking for info about IFB devices and how I can use it to incomming traffic shapping. Has IFB any web about it? Do any body known where I can find more info about it? I found this: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB But I can''t stand fine how to use it to allow many ifb''s devices or how to use it with "tc actions". Any help? Thanks --

I run a small Linux webserver and NAT router from my cable modem at home. Whenever someone starts an http download, all other traffic from my LAN is starved. Bandwidth is not really an issue, but latency is particularly horrible -- pings that usually come back in 20ms can take up to 600ms while the web server is active! I set up QoS (netfilter+iproute2) on the NAT machine in an attempt to give

Hey, I have a problem adding a filter matching anything, here is my setup: ############### tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: pfifo tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf latency 50ms rate \ 128kbit burst 256kbit tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 666 fw \ flowid 1:2 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent

Hi everyone, I''m new to tc but I need to use it to set up shaping on a new NAT box. In short: Each user must have their upload limited to 128kbit and downlink limited to 256kbit. Global bandwidth to be limited to 100Mbit Interactive packets to have higher priority 200+ users, so need to match packets fast So far I have managed to get the download limits working. However I need to