similar to: firewall problem

Hello all, We have two ADSL lines configured on a single box, hence interfaces ppp0 & ppp1. Is there a way to route packets to ppp0, say based on destination port 80 & other traffic like voice through ppp1? Thanks.

hi list, i need help i have two links LINK 1 Internet Linux ---- LAN LINK 2 i need that the traffic web goes to link 2 i use squid in the linux with transparent proxy i´ve tried to use squid parameter "tcp_outgoing_address" but it doesnt work. best regards -- --------------------------------------------------- Fabio S. Silva

--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP | my | router1 | | | linux | | | router2 ------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal

I''m a little confused about the many ways I''ve read that can be used for traffic load balancing, that is, two or more interfaces to the outside world being used transparently and efficiently by the internal machines. I heard about: a) netfilter SNAT to more than one IP. If I''m correct, this is only a round robin, that is, one connection goes here, the other goes there,

Hi There, I am also trying to do the same for my network. I have two links from different ISPs and I want to configure a failover and load balancing Linux router. I am facing same problem here, that how to detect link failure and let Linux box switch the gateway. I know it works when the first gateway is physically down and not reachable. But what to do if my link is up but there is problem

Perhaps someone with a sharper brain than I can solve this little mystery. I've Googled until I'm blue in the face, read all TFM's I can find, and tried several iptables rule combinations but just can't get the following to work. Here's my challenge: I have a CentOS-5.3 "main" server with a static public IP address running Apache, OpenVPN, and a bunch of other

here''s the setup (two dsl - same provider) +-----> link1 LAN----- linux box --| |----------internet +-----> link2 the setup is ok in terms of the failover requirement. the other link takes over when one is down. however, there is a very noticeable lag when both lines are up. i''ve tried changing

On 20 July 2015 at 09:00, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote: > On 07/17/2015 02:44 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >> Setting CMAKE_CXX_CREATE_STATIC_LIBRARY works on OS X and linux, but >> on windows I still see a call to "lld-link2 /lib..." when >> CMAKE_CXX_CREATE_STATIC_LIBRARY is set to use llvm-lib. > > What CMake generator are you using on

Hi, I'm trying to create a map of DFS links to actual server/share's.? I know that you can get this information by logging on to the DFS root server, but I'm trying to use the libsmbclient API to get this information. I have created a fairly simple DFS structure on 2003 servers with everything on the same domain. //MyDomain/DFSRoot /Link1 -> //Fileserv-1/FileShare1

I''ve been reading about multipath routes and found something that no howto I saw mentioned so far: multipath algorithms. The kernel has the followings: # zgrep MULTIPATH_ /proc/config.gz CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=m CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH_EMC iproute2

Hello, I'm trying to create a large matrix and it's extends the limit boundaries. The matrix is 100,000x2874 and R is throwing me out, what shall i do? Thanks Erez

Ok, very frustrated after spending most of the day onthe * irc channel with little to no help. Mostly just a bunch of crap about being a newbie, going and reading voip-info.org. etc. Despite me doing all that already. My situation is not good but here it is. Hurricane came through, power spikes killed PBX. Just trying to replace it affordable and possibly with a few more features. I am using *

Hi I need an advise if any one can help me. i have mass of data in 2 array A and B: A = 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 B = 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 and i have 3 rules to merge them into 3rd array C: if A[i] + B[i] == 0 then C[i]=0 if A[i] + B[i] == 1 then C[i]=1 if A[i] + B[i] == 2 then C[i]=2 it looks easy but with the regular way (loop) with large data it takes days (i test it). If any one can advise me what to do

Hello, I have a situation where I have numerous files with numerous hard links to each of them on an ext3 RHEL4.2 system. Some of these files are duplicates of the others. I would like to re-link all of the duplicates to point to a single inode. For instance if file1 has hardlinks link1 and link2, and file2 has hardlinks link3 and link4, I need to change it so that link1, link2 (these

Hi there. I have followed some documents found here and there, but do not have already success implementing a script using iptables and iproute. What I need is to send all traffic trough an ADSL line, but mail trough an expensive and slow DS0. The mail server lies on the PC acting also as firewall. I include the script. When using that I get some error messages (I found that the flush command

Erez, I think the API is very explicit about this, NULL is not an accepted input for any function taking SEXP by design. The special case of try*Eval() return values can be taken as a case where the resulting object is not actually SEXP but rather a special type which can be NULL (=failure) or SEXP. It may be even perhaps useful to declare it as a separate type to make this clearer, but I

Hello Speex. We are a small Canadian company currently researching the possibility of using Speex for an iPhone application. We wonder if Speex can be used to develop paid applications and if you require any fees or other payments if it used commercially Thank you. -- Erez T Yanuv Barzilay Digital Media | Interactive Design Graduate Student Center for Digital Media 577 Great Northern Way

Thanks, Vedant. Yes, we have done a lot of testing of Clang/LLVM (and GCC) in the past several years (more details at https://people.inf.ethz.ch/suz/emi/index.html): [GCC/LLVM bugs: *1,602* (total) / *1,007* (fixed)] [Reports: GCC (link1 <http://tinyurl.com/ojzdt78>, link2 <http://tinyurl.com/oxlkmjc>, link3 <http://tinyurl.com/jd3jnl3>, link4

Thank you Ivan, At this point, without it being documented explicitly, I tend to lean on the safe side. If the non-null assumption is ever incorrect, on debug and safe builds unwrapping is an assert that will guarantee to crash R. While the source code has plenty of NULL checks, also for some SEXP, it's hard to tell just from grepping if any are related to the public API or not. Secondly

You may also be interested in the following resources on compilers correctness (articles, software, and talks -- from the general topics to the ones specifically focused on testing, validation, and verification): https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/compilers.correctness.md Best regards, Matt P. Dziubinski On 12/7/2018 20:19, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > There's also