similar to: High Priotity for VoIP data over Internet link -- newbie

I'm pleased to announce the release of nbdkit 1.20, a high performance plugin-based Network Block Device (NBD) server. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_block_device Key features of nbdkit: * Multithreaded NBD server written in C with good performance. * Minimal dependencies for the basic server. * Liberal license (BSD) allows nbdkit to be linked to proprietary libraries or

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 13, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Khem Raj via Syslinux >> <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>> We can let compiler driver pass the right options to preprocessor after >>> processing

> On Sep 13, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Khem Raj via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> We can let compiler driver pass the right options to preprocessor after >> processing -Mxy options, right now its bypassing the gcc driver and >> handing them straight to cpp >>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hans > > On 3/10/17 1:10 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> Hi Khem, >> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Khem Raj via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Khem Raj via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > We can let compiler driver pass the right options to preprocessor after > processing -Mxy options, right now its bypassing the gcc driver and > handing them straight to cpp > > This also helps in other compilers processing these options correctly > for their preprocessors consumption

We can let compiler driver pass the right options to preprocessor after processing -Mxy options, right now its bypassing the gcc driver and handing them straight to cpp This also helps in other compilers processing these options correctly for their preprocessors consumption Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> --- mk/syslinux.mk | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Hi Khem, On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Khem Raj via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> ARM and AArch64 looking good, uploaded. >> > > This is not particularly related to this RC but in general with 4.0.0 > I am seeing a failure quite common

i have a customer that needs to plug the phones into the pc's using the pass-through rj45 available on most sip phones the question they are asking me is how to keep the data network separate from / secure from the voip network i understand they can set up vlans but i am hazy on a few details 1 since the phones are plugged into the pc's how will the phones be segmented into their own

Dear Chris, James, Valeri and all, Sorry to have not responded as I'm still on struggling with the recovery with no success. I've been trying to set up a new system with the exact same scenario (4 2TB hard drives and remove the 3rd one afterwards). I still cannot recover. We did have a backup system but it went bad for a while and we did not have replacement on time until this

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.12 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.12 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

In https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/merge_requests/30, Khem reports that in a cross-compilation environment, nbdkit embeds the absolute name of the cross-compiler into the resulting cc plugin, even though running the plugin should be favoring the bare name 'cc'. This in turn leads to non-reproducible builds. As the goal of cross-compiling nbdkit is to produce a binary that behaves

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:27:45AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > In https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/merge_requests/30, Khem reports > that in a cross-compilation environment, nbdkit embeds the absolute > name of the cross-compiler into the resulting cc plugin, even though > running the plugin should be favoring the bare name 'cc'. This in > turn leads to non-reproducible

Could those on the list who have used or tried to use VoIP over a satellite internet connection comment on how well it works or if it even works at all in a reliable way. What is the effect of latency on the VoIP path and how much is generally tolerable? routing via satellite adds about a quarter second of latency to the path. Is that too much? Eric

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Up here in British Columbia, Canada the major ISPs (telco and cable company) have started to enforce caps on bandwidth consumption per month. Other smaller ISPs have sprung out of the woodwork and offer ''unlimited'' consumption but the problem is that the quality of their connection is noticeably inferior to that of the major ISPs. In what way could I configure Linux

Has anyone had any experience with the Dell PowerConnect 2724 Gigabit Switch and VoIP traffic? It seems to support Class of Service (CoS), but not full Quality of Service (QoS). Will CoS help prioritize VoIP traffic at all? I am setting up an asterisk PBX for 22 users with very light traffic, but I don't want to have the call start skipping just because someone is pulling a large

Dear all My current setup is the following: Normal Hosts --------+ eth0 eth1 | +----------+ +-<->| F/W box |--<-> Internet | +----------+ High priority hosts--+ My eth0 is a normal 100MBps LAN and my Internet connection is a 1Mbps ADSL line. What I want to achieve is to have normal hosts to share a big