similar to: Dual ISP routing and NAT problem

I recently couldn't connect to a windowXP domain share from a winXP client.(Samba is the PDC) When I attempted to mount the share from the samba server this is the error I got. colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount //buckwheat/share buckwheat/ Password: 6586: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnomem (Insufficient server memory to perform the requested function.) colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount

Hi all, i''m puzzled by a ploblem and I don''t know how to debug it... I have a firewall with 2 gateways, adsl and isdn. Main gateway is via adsl, backup via isdn. I setup 2 table ''adsl'' and ''isdn''. You can find a description below. I made a script to test both tables. That mainly 1. adds an iptables -t mangle -A

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Hello. I'm in need of some help to shed some light on a strange problem. The box is running Samba 4.1.7 on FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 and I suspect (though I'm not sure) all troubles started after the upgrade from 4.1.6. The setup is quite simple: no AD, no LDAP, only one server. A command as simple as "smbclient -U user //SERVER/SHARE", if fired up several times in a row on the

With WinXP host, RH8 VMware guest, at level 3, I issue: mount -t smbfs -o user,noauto,dmask=777,fmask=777,username=xx, password=yy //DELLBOX/linuxShare /mnt/linuxShare and get: Connection to DELLBOX failed SMB connection failed timeout connecting to 192.168.113.1:139 Error connecting to 192.168.113.1 I cannot find this IP address anywhere. My tables indicate that port 139 is

Hi everyone, This is my first post, so apologies if I have not included all details about the issue. I am using a Nokia e71 to connect to a corporate asterisk server and am having issue with dialing. I can dial all extensions and receive all types of incoming calls. I cannot however, dial local phone numbers. When putting the service into debug, it appears that the device does not enter

Hello Timo, is there a way, either in 1.2.x or in 2.x to activate disable_plaintext_auth=yes only for some address or network ? The idea would be to enable clients from the internal networks to keep making clear text connections while forbidding it to the rest of the world. Thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel at pasteur.fr> | P?le informatique - syst?mes et

Hello. We are using pxelinux for years to boot Linux via PXE since years. Since EFI is spreading, I changed configuration to be able to boot EFI systems. The "Client": - HP Proliant DL380Gen9 System FW: 1.21 11/03/2014, latest available - NIC used for booting: HP Embedded LOM 331i (Broadcom BCM 5719/ tg3), FW: 5719-v1.38 The Server: - ISC-DHCP with tfpd-hpa running on Debian 6.x -

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Holger Baust wrote: > Hello. > > We are using pxelinux for years to boot Linux via PXE since years. > Since EFI is spreading, I changed configuration to be able to boot EFI > systems. > > The "Client": > - HP Proliant DL380Gen9 System FW: 1.21 11/03/2014, latest available > - NIC used for booting: HP Embedded LOM 331i

I'm not sure if this even SHOULD work. I can't find anything really useful in the documentation. I have a RedHat 7.3 system in the DMZ of our network, its address is 192.168.222.10, broadcast address is 192.168.222.254 I firewall, linux based with 3 ports, the 192.168.222.0 net (DMZ), the "outside world" on one port and the internal network is 192.168.111.0, broadcasting

Hi, here my system on shorewall: eth0 192.168.108.1 net eth1 192.168.109.1 dmz eth2 192.168.110.1 loc_110 eth3 192.168.111.1 loc I haven''t access from or to server in loc_110 through shorewall. I can use ssh or other types from loc to dmz or from loc to fw, but I can''t use connections to loc_110. I can also use ssh - connection from fw to loc_110 or redirectly. Where is the

I've looked all over the archives, and I can't find the answer tot his. I have a machine called pendor, that's running my DNS, DHCPD, WINS, and is my router between my ethernet and token-ring networks, as well as my masquerading firewall/router to the dialup line. Yep, this machine does it all. I have this line in /etc/smb.conf: interfaces = 192.168.1.2/24 192.168.2.2/24 Where

I have a working router (thanks to Julian''s patches and the threads on this site) load balancing over Dual ISP''s. Links for the curious (see router setup below as well) - Necessary Patches - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ How to Patch (I use Debian Sarge and downloaded the latest source from kernel.org) - http://www.desktop-linux.net/debkernel.htm Necessary Reading -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I am trying to setup a replicated volume to serve (in a load-balanced setup) static content. Since we are talking about small sized files (thumbnails) that do not take too much space, one ideea is to set that up in RAM (using /dev/shm mountpoint on CentOS). The main problem is that if I define a replicated volume using glusterfs, and I

Hi All We have setup a Centos7 host server with KVM and have created multiple VM running Ubuntu 14.04 using virt-manager. All VMs are having forward mode as "NAT" and using internal DHCP IP address 192.168.122.x series and we gave them fixed ips based on their mac address. Now all these VMs are able to access Internet and able to run update on all these guest OS. But these VMs are web

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Was running 1.0pre2 just fine, but had to move machines, so I figgured I'd give 1.0pre3 a try. After getting everything to build and figguring out the new config files, here's where I'm stuck. Start the server process (remote machine). Start the client process (local machine). In remote machine, the following shows up in syslog: tinc[2659]: Got SEGV signal In local machine, the

Hi, I want forward port 21 and 443 to my squid. A simply rule (dnat) didnt help me. My http - port (only 80) will forwarded to my squid. It runs fine. Here I have used the HowTo from Tom and the hints from http://lartc.org/. I want to do the same with port 21 as port 80. My network: Shorewall: eth0 net (192.168.108.1) eth1 dmz (192.168.109.1) eth2 loc (192.168.110.1) eth3 loc1