similar to: Multiple providers routing

Hi, I have the following situation: 1 gateway box with 2 WAN interfaces (eth1 and eth2). 1 LAN interface eth0 default gateway is eth2 I want to route all traffic with destination protocol tcp 22 (ssh) NOT over the default gateway eth2 but force them to find it''s route over eth1. All other traffic must go the normal way over eth2. Is this possible with tc or an other tool? --

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

First of all, thank you to all of you who have helped to make iptables possible, whether in writing the code for it or testing it. It is BETTER than sliced bread! :-) Anyways, I have two questions related to the use of iptables. 1. I read on a post somewhere that it is smart to put the following two rules at the end of one''s iptables ruleset: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -j

Hello everyone, Please excuse these basic questions but I am new to Linux and I am getting desperate for answers. We are running redhat linux and after many hours of investigation I am unable to get a certain ip rule and ip route command combination to work. These are the software versions installed. [root@c1b04a01 linux-2.4.21-15.EL]# uname -a Linux c1b04a01 2.4.21-15.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Apr

Can anyone tell me whether I have a routing problem, or an openVPN problem, or something else? I''ve stared at this for so long I think I must be looking in the wrong place! I have 3 machines: Machine A has single ethernet card, eth0, 192.168.5.5 Machine B has eth0, 192.168.5.? on the local net, eth1, 81.2.x.y to the internet, and

Hi, just wishing you a merry christmas and happy new year, by presenting to you a new trojan for Linux. It`s professionally made by Apple Computer Inc. (must be somebody who threatened them to do it). <https://www.anubis-ca.com/tmp/IMG_20181210_173521.jpg> <https://www.anubis-ca.com/tmp/IMG_20181210_175350.jpg> ---------Videresendt melding------- Fra: Arun I. Gurung <arun-g at

I am using tbf to do bandwidth limitation. i found that when i start passing traffic there is a burst and then the rate goes down to what is configured. is this a known issue or do i need to change some parameters? thanks. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

I set up this config: +------+ -+ ISP1 +--+ +------+ | +-------+ +--+ linux | +------+ | +-------+ -+ ISP2 +--+ +------+ No problem. Standard setup with two ISP''s. Both routed subnets. Default gateway is ISP1. No magic here. Now I put a server behind the Linux box. I want the server to be reachable on an /extra/ IP in the routed subnet of ISP2. +------+ -+ ISP1

Is there a flow diagram as to where tc actions take place with respect to NAT and other iptables functions on a multihomed box (private & public NICs) ? Are tc filter rules consulted before or after NATing? My real interest is in basic understanding first, and then solving a real problem second. Example: Firewall Public NIC 123.123.123.1 Firewall Private NIC 192.168.168.1 Dedicated Video

Hello all, I am still reading about my QoS rules and I need that one of my servers (that is into my LAN but has an routing ip address) did not get into the qos rules I have. So I want that all traffic coming or going to that specifc host did not get shapped by any traffic control and do not get even into a QoS class. How can I do this? Att, Nataniel Klug

helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1,

Hi fellas, I am working on a dataframe cam and it involves comparison within the 2 columns - t1 and t2 on about 20K rows and 14 columns. ### cap = cam; # this doesn't take long. ~1 secs. for( i in 1:length(cam$end_date)) { x1=strptime(cam$end_date[i], "%d/%m/%Y"); x2=strptime(cam$end_date[i+1], "%d/%m/%Y"); t1= cam$vol[i]; t2= cam$vol[i+1];

Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be

hi all. i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that "tc" code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on the pppX devices. I tested it and talking jargon, what should i do? The issue is that for each PPPoE login, PPPoE-server

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

is there anybody who can tell me how to forward request to other host, i would like to forward all dns requests to other dns server and it must be done with packet forwarding because dns server (resolver) must go down. There is many docs about port forwarding based on nat table and explanation consider linux box act like nat with two e cards. thanks, alens

Hi all ls the network address traslation in centos5.2 different? I disable the default iptable rule and use the following commands but I can't connect http://public:8080 from outside to this host 192.168.0.10 port 80 eth1 is public address eth0 is private address 192.168.0.1 iptables -F -t nat iptables --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface eth1 -j

Hi, I'm using the preconfigured firewall that comes with CentOS 5. I configure it with system-config-securitylevel-tui, close all ports except SSH, and then open only the ones I need. Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires opening a series of ports. I've configured the app to use ports 7000 to 7010 (TCP and UDP). When running

Hi All, I am new to CentOS and I signed up for a Mosso Cloud Server that runs Cent OS 5.2 I can ssh in. I ran: yum install vnc vnc-server then: vncserver (and set desktop viewing password) But I cannot connect. How do I add 5900 to the centos firewall? How do I edit the conf file? I only have SSH ability at this point... -jason

I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server, but now the simplest thing for me to do is also set it up to provide internet access for the small shop as well. So it will have one external, WAN facing nic that needs all incoming ports except UDP 5060 and 10000 -> 60000 blocked for all but two ips.