similar to: Shaping by IP''s

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Shaping by IP''s"

2006 Feb 21
0
Best internet traffic shaping for small lan
I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0
2011 Jan 14
1
Spectralink 8002
Hello, I hope this isn't too off topic, but I'm attempting to set up a Spectralink 8002 Wifi phone with our Asterisk installation, and seem to be running into a brick well (more of a wall than others that have posted their experiences). My problem is that the phone boots, associates with the wireless, grabs an IP (tried static too - same thing), contacts the TFTP server for firmware, then
2004 Jan 28
4
Problems with HTB (ceil being overpassed)
We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an
2006 Feb 09
1
Re: Help on Vicidial
Here is another log from the * server CLI, I reall hope some one can help me out on this one. thanks |SELECT count(*) FROM vicidial_auto_calls where status = 'LIVE' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id = '' and call_time < "" and lead_id != '';| -- VDAD get agent: |0|update of vla table: |127.0.0.1 |UPDATE vicidial_live_agents set
2010 Oct 28
3
SIP client floods port 5060 and gets blocked
Hello, Is there any reason why an IP-phone would pounder on port 5060 ? My firewall blocks the public IP because it thinks the remote IP is port scanning on port 5060. I think the phone is just registering but for some reason it does this repeatedly in a very short time. Oct 28 09:01:48 astserver kernel: Firewall: *UDP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
2004 Jan 19
3
Shaping inbound ok, outbound wrong
Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc
2004 Sep 22
3
Strange DNAT problems with shorewall 1.4.8
I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned
2006 Sep 13
1
HTB shaping problem
Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org
2011 Jul 15
1
samba outside of LAN
Hi, All I have set up a samba enviroment on a ubuntu server. I can see it using "smbclient -L localhost". But now I want to access the samba server using a Windows PC, and they are not in LAN. I cannot access the server using \\server_ip <file://server_ip/>. Someone suggested using SSH, but I don't know what to do in detail. Any help will be gratefully
2011 Jun 14
1
Page() bumps user out of a call
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my intercom function that I use for under-chin paging. I'm running 1.6.2.13 on this server, and we use Linksys SPA-942's for our general phones. I have a global defined which has all the SIP channels concatenated together - this is ${ALL-PAGE-EXTS}. The problem comes when a user is on the line, and someone else uses the intercom function to page
2005 Feb 08
1
Shaping and forward
Lartc readers I have a peculiar problem with shaping and firewalling. My tc rules work great, below is a smaller version: #Root tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 100 #Root Class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1024kbit quantum 20000 burst 15k #Class for each user tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 32kbit ceil
2013 Aug 05
2
rsyncd: --temp-dir outside of module or target target
Hi, I'm running rsyncd in daemon mode started via xinetd. My /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like: [cache] path = /mnt/tst_vol_aws/sat_p_cache/ comment = Cache Directory use chroot = false read only = false uid = someone gid = someone dont compress = * On the client I run: /usr/bin/rsync --delete --ignore-errors -gpzsoltD --temp-dir=/mnt/tst_vol_aws/tmp/rsync -r
2004 Oct 04
5
DNAT strange thing ???
Hi list, This is my first post there. CONTEXT : -------------- I have a little lan behind a shorewalled box (internet) -- NET_IP [gateway] LOC-IP -- (lan X.Y.0.0) internet -> net zone connected to the gateway via a ppp interface lan -> loc zone connected to the gateway via eth1 NET_IP and LOC_IP are defined in shorewall params file GOAL : --------- i want to forward http and
2005 May 04
4
OpenSwan traffic shaping with HTB & sfq
Hi All, I''ve got an interoffice IPSEC VPN in place that I''m trying to give priority to terminal service (tcp 3389) traffic. I''ve created rules at each end, but have hit a bit of a dillemma. As the data is encrypted I must also give highest priority to protocol 50 otherwise the priority is lost as the packet gets encrypted. When I do this however, I can''t
1999 Jan 13
1
Secure? Samba over internet
I'd like comments (suggestions, improvements, messages that start with "you moron you forgot that. . .") on the following horrible dirty kludge to make a (nearly, with any luck) un-hackable set of shares available to specific users on the internet. On the Server, initially all packets bound for port 139 are rejected as the default policy. The server is connected to the internet full
2005 Feb 06
2
Need help with perl script/agi for ringback
Hi, I'm trying to write a simple perl script that will run the following: Action: Originate Channel: local/xxx@callback/r/n Exten: 1234 Context: callback Priority: 1 Extensions.conf exten => 500,1,agi,callback.pl callback perl script: use Net::Telnet (); $mgrUSERNAME='fred'; $mgrSECRET='bloggs'; $server_ip='127.0.0.1'; $tn->print("Action:
2016 Feb 11
6
Question on setting up dovecot
Many thanks to Joseph Tam and Steffen Kaiser for pointing me to the logging information that I should have been using in the first place. Now that I have separate log files and debugging information, I'm still at a loss to see why the mail is not being pulled over from the Linux system to the Windows 7 machine. To recap, here is the output from doveconf -n:
2015 Sep 12
2
pxelinux tries to load ldlinux.c32 from DHCP server, instead of next-server
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter > >> <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: > >>> On
2011 Sep 19
2
cli_push returned NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
Hello all, I'm having a problem with smbclient after an upgrade from 3.0.37 to 3.5.3 (I also tested 3.5.11 and 3.6.0). The client uses a command similar to: tar -cz /some/directory | smbclient '\\server_ip\share' -N -c 'put - "\directory\filename"' After that the client checks the exit status to determine if the transfer succeeded or failed. The server
2004 Sep 28
2
Shaping not working
Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in