similar to: Shaping by IP''s

I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc

Hello, I hope this isn't too off topic, but I'm attempting to set up a Spectralink 8002 Wifi phone with our Asterisk installation, and seem to be running into a brick well (more of a wall than others that have posted their experiences). My problem is that the phone boots, associates with the wireless, grabs an IP (tried static too - same thing), contacts the TFTP server for firmware, then

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

Here is another log from the * server CLI, I reall hope some one can help me out on this one. thanks |SELECT count(*) FROM vicidial_auto_calls where status = 'LIVE' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id = '' and call_time < "" and lead_id != '';| -- VDAD get agent: |0|update of vla table: |127.0.0.1 |UPDATE vicidial_live_agents set

Hello, Is there any reason why an IP-phone would pounder on port 5060 ? My firewall blocks the public IP because it thinks the remote IP is port scanning on port 5060. I think the phone is just registering but for some reason it does this repeatedly in a very short time. Oct 28 09:01:48 astserver kernel: Firewall: *UDP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00

Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org

Lartc readers I have a peculiar problem with shaping and firewalling. My tc rules work great, below is a smaller version: #Root tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 100 #Root Class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1024kbit quantum 20000 burst 15k #Class for each user tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 32kbit ceil

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

Hi All, I''ve got an interoffice IPSEC VPN in place that I''m trying to give priority to terminal service (tcp 3389) traffic. I''ve created rules at each end, but have hit a bit of a dillemma. As the data is encrypted I must also give highest priority to protocol 50 otherwise the priority is lost as the packet gets encrypted. When I do this however, I can''t

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in

Hi, All I have set up a samba enviroment on a ubuntu server. I can see it using "smbclient -L localhost". But now I want to access the samba server using a Windows PC, and they are not in LAN. I cannot access the server using \\server_ip <file://server_ip/>. Someone suggested using SSH, but I don't know what to do in detail. Any help will be gratefully

Hi I''m doing traffic shaping with tc on ''10.0.0.0/30'' and ''10.0.0.28/30''. I want to delete part of shaping rules on the fly. (see my configuration at the end of this mail) I wan''t to delete the shaping for ''10.0.0.0/30'' on the fly while still keeping the shaping for part ''10.0.0.28/30'' running. When I for

Hello all, I'm having a problem with my intercom function that I use for under-chin paging. I'm running 1.6.2.13 on this server, and we use Linksys SPA-942's for our general phones. I have a global defined which has all the SIP channels concatenated together - this is ${ALL-PAGE-EXTS}. The problem comes when a user is on the line, and someone else uses the intercom function to page

Hi, I'm running rsyncd in daemon mode started via xinetd. My /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like: [cache] path = /mnt/tst_vol_aws/sat_p_cache/ comment = Cache Directory use chroot = false read only = false uid = someone gid = someone dont compress = * On the client I run: /usr/bin/rsync --delete --ignore-errors -gpzsoltD --temp-dir=/mnt/tst_vol_aws/tmp/rsync -r

Hi, I''m trying to modify the Wondershaper script so achieve the following. 1. Prioritize traffic to the few IP addresses. 2. Everyone else should get a fair amount of bandwidth The problem I am facing is when I run this script is that the bandwidth seems to get halved. I tried to apply this script to a site where the upstream and downstream were fully saturated. I immediately saw

hello, I have working htb system with about 1000 users. Until now I reload all rules at change, but it take too much time to apply. I cannot delete applyed filters. There is rules for one user: #!/bin/bash -v # Download shaper EX -> 2:20 /sbin/tc class add dev eth2 parent 2:20 classid 2:1775 htb rate 8000Kbit ceil 10000Kbit quantum 1514 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth2 parent 2:1775 sfq perturb

Hello list. I''ve configured a very simple script to slow down packets coming from a particular IP Address. I''ve used IPTABLES to mark traffic coming from this IP Address, but it does not appear to be working as expected. Let me first describe my system as maybe what I''m doing is beyond what NETFILTER can do. I have one machine that runs all my servers as

Hi list, This is my first post there. CONTEXT : -------------- I have a little lan behind a shorewalled box (internet) -- NET_IP [gateway] LOC-IP -- (lan X.Y.0.0) internet -> net zone connected to the gateway via a ppp interface lan -> loc zone connected to the gateway via eth1 NET_IP and LOC_IP are defined in shorewall params file GOAL : --------- i want to forward http and

Hi, I''m looking for a script in order to do traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with linux router. Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven''t much bandwidth (512kbit). Also, I''ve a squid cache and it works very good! I''ve found Jim QoS script, and FairNat. Which is more suitable for me ? Jim QoS ? FairNat ? other ? If I put FairNat, I would need ZPH patch