similar to: (no subject)

Woops - my fat fingers hit the send key before I could put in a subject a minute ago. Hello - I am using kernel 2.4.27 and running into behavior I don''t know how to explain. I have 2 relevant interfaces. eth0 is external, eth1 is internal. My internal LAN is 10.10.10.0/24. My External range is 1.2.3.0/27 (dummied up). I have an H.323 videoconference device inside my internal

I found the problem! It was me and it was dumb... This was the network layout: 10.10.10.0/24 1.2.3.0/27 10.10.10.n internal hosts | <----+-----+--------+ +-------+------>to the Internet | | | | Proxied | | | H.323 device Firewall Router eth1 eth0 1.2.3.11

Here is a puzzle. I have a network with several servers. It''s a mess. It''s a /24 and pieces and servers are all over the place inside this /24 block, on both sides of the firewall. For example, the router at 1.2.3.1 is outside the firewall and many of the servers at 1.2.3.nnn/24 are behind the firewall. (Obviously, 1.2.3.nnn is a fudged network.) eth0 points outward to

Hello, I have a little strange config. I will try to explain it as short as possible. I have ethernet switch, which is Port Based VLAN enabled. For example: this switch have 3 ports. Port 1 is VLAN 1 only. Port 2 is VLAN 2 only. Port 3 is VLAN 1 and 2. This means that if packet come from Port 1 it will be sent ONLY to port 3. If packet come from Port 2 it again will be sent to Port 3 only.

Hello everyone, I''m using shorewall successfully on many servers withount any problems and I''m really happy with this great piece of software. But now I ran into a problem with shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 running on a vServer. The provider uses virtual interfaces like eth0:vs01 for the customers. The interface eth0 cannot be touched. I''ve read the instructions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

hi everybody. im trying to set up an QoS config, using layer7 (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) for protocol detection. im suposing 3 clients with this configuration: 3 clients: 1.2.3.1 , 1.2.3.2 , 1.2.3.3 1.2.3.1 has 256kbit bandwidth "guaranteed" clients 1.2.3.2 and 1.2.3.3 has 256kbit bandwith so im marking every packet using layer7 iptables module, classifying them in three

Dear all, I've implemented an Asterisk 1.4 with SIP service for voip and video. So I can establish a voip + video connection *one-to-one* only....it works OK. But I'd like to implement a videoconference *one-to-many* in order to intercommunicate many clients, is it possible with Asterisk 1.4 ??? (multicast is better than brodcast in this situation of course) Thanks a lot, Alejandro

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@selfip.ru> wrote: Hi Vasiliy, > > ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:46, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@rubenkerkhof.com>: > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 4/9/19 11:35 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:10 PM

shorewall-users hi,ALL I have a firewall have three interface, one NIC is internal (eth0), second NIC is SSN(eth2), and other NIC is external(eth1), on internal network have 10.0.1.59 and gw 10.0.1.163 eth0: 192.168.1.254/24 eth1: 10.0.1.55/24 gw 10.0.1.163 I use shorewall''s proxyarp 10.0.1.59 eth1 eth0 no no that is OK. I saw /usr/share/shorewall/firewall, I

In kernel 2.6.31, the handling of the rp_filter interface option was changed incompatibly. Previously, the effective value was determined by the setting of net.ipv4.config.dev.proxy_arp logically ANDed with the setting of net.ipv4.config.all.proxy_arp. Beginning with kernel 2.6.31, the value is the arithmetic MAX of those two values. Additionally, a ''loose'' routefiltering

Hello alltogether, I''m new to the list, so please excuse any violations of listiquette... I didn''t have to much to do with linux based firewalling and routing for quite a time and found that proxy-arp changed in between... As I struggled with it I found that the Advanced routing... howto wasn''t to helpfull. Especially the documentation seems to be rather vice versa to

/-----------------------\ | | |eth0 |eth0 |-------| |-------| | |eth1 eth1 | | -------- A |____ _______| B |----- | | \ / | | --------| | | --------| | | | |

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

Hi, I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and iptables. I have the following setup: eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1 (obscured here for privacy) eth1: connects to DMZ with static public IP 1.2.3.2 (obscured here for privacy) eth2: connects to LAN with static private IP 192.168.0.1 Traffic to hosts in the DMZ/Internet through eth0/1 work fine.

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: important When Xen is configured in routed mode, restarting xend fails because the script hotplugpath.sh is missing. Please see below for more information. *** root at eliott:~# /etc/init.d/xend restart Restarting Xen daemons: xend/etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 20: /etc/xen/scripts/hotplugpath.sh: No such file or directory

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: important $vifnum is undefined when this is called. Starting XEN control daemon: xend/etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth/proxy_arp: No such file or directory /etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth/proxy_arp: No such file or directory /etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27:

Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three

ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:46, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@rubenkerkhof.com>: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 4/9/19 11:35 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:10 PM Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 4/9/19 4:38 PM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:

Hi all i have big problem,I am newbie and my english is bad,but i know you can help solve my problem. I have box with gentoo,I live in latvia and i have 2 ISP: One isp gives me ip range from 62.85.71.1-62.85.71.15 (62.85.71.1 is gateway) but there is only latvian trafik - no other countries (link is 2 mbit Asinhronus dsl) and other isp who gives me one ip from dhcp adn there ios no trafik