similar to: passing invisible parameters

Here''s the readme. I think it''s okay to post this kind of thing to the mailing list. Anyway, hopefully someone else finds this useful. UrlForWithPrefix ================ By Pat Maddox Very simple plugin, adds the :prefix option to url_for. Say in your environment.rb file you''ve got ActionController::AbstractRequest.relative_url_root = "/super" Any time

Good evening (or afternoon or whatever it is where you are), Before I start setting it all up, I have a question about lighttpd and multiple rails apps. From what I have read, it is at the minute only possible to do multiple rails apps using subdomains: typo.mysite.com hieraki.mysite.com rforum.mysite.com etc, etc and not currently possible to do this: mysite.com/typo mysite.com/rforums

hello... On 2/8/07, cdvr <codecraig-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Hi, > I watched the rails screencast on creating a blog in 15 minutes. > I followed along got it working on my home PC and I then uploaded it > to my web host. So I have, > > /home/<username>/blog > > I had to change some config in the blog app (i.e. production

I attached a rails helper implementation of the fb_table described here: http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Facebook_Styles I included testing and comments. I hope you find it useful. Curiously, it''s really a small extension of FBML. Richard -------------- next part -------------- Index: test/rails_integration_test.rb

I''m trying to use button_to and have it use an image in place of the submit button. I had figured it would work the same as link_to like so: button_to(image_tag("editicon", :size => "16x16", :border => 0), :action => ''edit'', :id => person.id) but this instead displays the image code as the button name. Surely there is a simple way to

Hi, I wonder why scaffolding uses a link_to tag for the destroy links. Seems like these should be POST requests with button_to. The Rails book dedicates pages 335-337 to this very issue. Peter

Hi, I''d like to make the :confirm option in my link_to/button_to erb elements conditional. So, if the page is in some state, no confirmation is requested, but not otherwise, etc. So far, my only (ugly) approach is to replace the linker html itself depending on changes in state, but I believe there must be an easier way to ''toggle'' the confirmation option on/off. Can

I''m looking for some advice on how to write a jump script - something that will look up a url in my database and redirect a cleaner url to the one in the database. For example: url: http://www.amazon.com jump url: http://www.mysite.com/jump/a

I''m new to Rails and am trying to use a field called "code" instead of "id" in my URLs. For example, assuming I''ve got a database of motorcycles makes where the codes are "Honda", "Yamaha", "Suzuki", and "Kawasaki", etc. To show the info about Honda I want to use this url: http://www.mysite.com/makes/honda/

I''ve changed my destructive link_to statements in favor of button_to. But what if I want to make an .rjs call with that button? Seems like we need something equivalent to link_to_remote, so that the button can make an ajax request instead submitting the form. Or am I missing the point entirely? Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message

I''m working on a RESTful app, and I''ve hit a snag. Here''s a simplified example of the problem. (Excuse me if this example code isn''t strictly correct; I''m typing from memory.) Suppose I have a table which models a simple counter. It has a single column, "count": class CreateCounters < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up

When i use button_to or link_to, i can easily request a confirmation dialog with (for example) <%= button_to "Delete this story", { :controller => "story", :action => "delete", :id => @story.id }, :confirm => "Delete story: are you sure?" %> I also want to do this for the submit buttons on my forms, which are

Hi, everyone. I''m getting a production server ready for a site I''m working on, and I''ve been a bit stumped by a difference between the development server (running under Webrick) and the production server (running under lighttpd). Here''s the scenario: I''m working on a variation of an e-commerce system. When someone finalizes an order with our

I''m trying to help the sys admins of my server figure out what is up with our Rails installation (debian sarge - completely up to date). Hitting a simple page yields 31,000 failed stat64''s and takes anywhere from 8 - 44 seconds. They #! for ruby is correct everywhere, but it''s like it can''t find Rails. These are box stock standard installs. Here''s

Dear R-users, How do I extract numbers between asp?P= and &VID from my txt vector? I have tried grep function with no luck. txt <- c(" http://www.mysite.com/system/empty.asp?P=2&VID=default&SID=421384237289476&S=1&C=18631", " http://www.mysite.com/system/empty.asp?P=123&VID=default&SID=421384237289476&S=1&C=18643", "

Hi all, My site uses subdomains to define an item. Eg http://itemname.mysite.com I fetch the itemname and render the appropriate site from that itemname. The subdomain is used everywhere (eg http://itemname.mysite.com/events, http://itemname.mysite.com/products/show/11, ...) I now want to give the user the possibilty to use a ''real'' domain like www.itemname.com that should

Good morning All - I am working on a time tracking application as a learning excercise and have run into an error neither I nor Google can remedy. When loading my view, I get an error: ''undefined method ''true_class_path'' for #<ActionView::Base:......... Context: I have controllers for Project, Worktrack and ''Workbench'', among others. Workbench is

Hi Ben, Thanks that helped a lot. The problem seems to be that with the move to C++11 we now have: void std::vector<_Ty>::push_back(std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2> &&)' and there no conversion operator that can be applied to convert: 'std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2>' to 'std::pair<_Ty3,_Ty4> && Where: [ _Ty1=void *,

A question about mongrel, apache and authentication. I''ve got a Rails site with I think a very typical setup: a mongrel cluster behind an Apache proxy. So Apache''s handling the static stuff and it hands off dynamic content to mongrel. I want to put the site temporarily behind Apache''s basic authentication. What I get when I do this is that is a password prompt which

I''ve got a couple apps that I use (billing app, support ticket app, some other custom apps) that I want to integrate into one site. They will all use the same layout for the most part, and will link between each other. When I initially thought of doing this, I figured if I put the apps at different roots - /billing /support etc - then the links wouldn''t work at all, because