similar to: Packet vanishes after mangle-prerouting.

First of all, thank you to all of you who have helped to make iptables possible, whether in writing the code for it or testing it. It is BETTER than sliced bread! :-) Anyways, I have two questions related to the use of iptables. 1. I read on a post somewhere that it is smart to put the following two rules at the end of one''s iptables ruleset: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -j

HI folks, I have a linux router connected to two separate internet connection from an ISP. There is a third interface ( ip -> 192.168.1.1 ) in the router connected to the local network. Configured the routing tables and added the rules and everything seems to be working fine from the routing box. Traceroute to external internet sites reveal that traffic is being routed correctly and

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

Hi, I have the following situation: 1 gateway box with 2 WAN interfaces (eth1 and eth2). 1 LAN interface eth0 default gateway is eth2 I want to route all traffic with destination protocol tcp 22 (ssh) NOT over the default gateway eth2 but force them to find it''s route over eth1. All other traffic must go the normal way over eth2. Is this possible with tc or an other tool? --

Hello everyone, Please excuse these basic questions but I am new to Linux and I am getting desperate for answers. We are running redhat linux and after many hours of investigation I am unable to get a certain ip rule and ip route command combination to work. These are the software versions installed. [root@c1b04a01 linux-2.4.21-15.EL]# uname -a Linux c1b04a01 2.4.21-15.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Apr

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

I''m trying to setup some DNAT and the packets seem to be disappearing after the PREROUTING step. The packets are coming in eth2 (both LOG targets in iptables and tcpdump confirm this). They are then DNATed to an IP that should cause them to go out eth3. However I never see them go out that interface. I have tried putting LOG rules into the FORWARD chain with no success. I''m

Hello, I have a pretty standard two-interface setup with masquerading, so the local network can connect through the firewall to the Internet. On the firewall box (trevor), eth0 is connected to a cable modem and eth1 is connected to the local network via a crossed cable. There is one other machine on the local network (brian), whose eth0 is at the other end of the crossed cable. I used to have

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 Willie <MidSpeck at hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |MidSpeck at hotmail.com --- Comment #8 from Willie <MidSpeck at hotmail.com> 2011-12-16 21:29:19 --- I

Greetings all, I realize from the subject line this makes little sense but here''s the scenario: I''m trying to shape (via priority - not bandwidth) peer to peer traffic from a number of clients. Currently I use an IMQ device to bring all their outbound (inbound to me - outbound to Inet) traffic together to work with policies all at the same time. I''m testing the

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is

Hello everyone! I'm new to open-source in general and to LLVM in particular. I'd like to contribute and was thinking of starting from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5639 What the next step should be? Should I register somewhere? Thanks, Tami -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have two connections to the Internet. I implemented the load balancing as described in chapter 4.2 "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers" The problem that occurred is that the client applications like Yahoo Messenger or even PuTTY (SSH client) are loosing the connection very often. Does anyone experienced this problem? Does anyone knows an workaround for this problem?

The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at

Woops - my fat fingers hit the send key before I could put in a subject a minute ago. Hello - I am using kernel 2.4.27 and running into behavior I don''t know how to explain. I have 2 relevant interfaces. eth0 is external, eth1 is internal. My internal LAN is 10.10.10.0/24. My External range is 1.2.3.0/27 (dummied up). I have an H.323 videoconference device inside my internal

Hi, I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards, connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse direction. The forwarding node is