similar to: Sort of solution to traffic only going to last nexthop

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Sort of solution to traffic only going to last nexthop"

2010 Sep 15
2
Help me Out!!!!
It is with deep sorrow and broken heart that am sending you this mail. Am in deep need and? my situation is lamentable.? my family and I decide to come visit Wales,United Kingdom for? a short vacation. To our greatest dismay we were attacked and ripped apart at the park of? the hotel where we were lodging,all cash,credit cards and cell phone were forcefully robbed? off us at gun point but we still
2006 Jan 16
10
Multi-path routing only using last nexthop in default route.
I''ve applied julian''s paches to a 2.6.14 gentoo kernel with the appropiate options enabled, and i''m using a modified version of the mpath2.sh script also available on julian''s site http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ Overall everything works nearly perfectly. Incomming connections to either the fios (PPPoE) connection, or cable modem get routed back out correctly. The
2002 Aug 30
1
Problem with nexthop and gets dead
Hello, We have debian with 2.4.19-pre8 kernel We active the load balancing with two ethernets to internet, wih the command: ip rule add from 128.1.3.1/32 lookup host_proxy preference 2060 ip route add default table host_proxy proto static nexthop via 80.25.175.1 dev eth0 \ nexthop via 212.170.14.1 dev eth1 when see the route
2009 Oct 16
0
routing using iproute2 nexthop
Hello Everyone, I configured a server for a friend's Internet cafe. He has 2 ISPs. Here is what I did: ## NAT -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth2 -j SNAT --to-source 82.77.148.83 -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.128 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 83.103.190.175 ## Removing default routing /sbin/ip rule add prio 50 table main /sbin/ip route del default table main ##
2006 Dec 08
0
May problem with iproute2 nexthop?
Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...
2001 Dec 05
0
Problem setting up nexthop
Dear Alexey, Sorry to bother you with this small question about nexthop syntax failing, but I haven''t found anyone else who can answer it - including Matthew Marsh or those on the lartc mailing list. The problem, with 2.2.19 and 2.2.20 kernels and versions of iproute2 up to iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007 (the most recent that compiles for me), is that this command does not work: # ip ro
2004 Aug 20
1
trouble with nexthop when I try to load balance
I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2
2005 Oct 13
0
nexthop match
Hello guys! I have the following setup: Linux router acting as a gateway for several subnets in the LAN. The subnets are: 127.17.0.0/16 (will go out via NAT) 195.229.x.x/24 193.289.y.y/28 213.189.z.z/26 etc. There are about 20 subnets including the private Class B subnet. I want to mark the packets that will go on the Internet, and leave out the packets that move from one subnet to the
2003 Dec 14
0
nexthop: free service to pstn via fwd/iaxtel
(found on dslr voip forum) http://www.freephoneproject.com/nexthop/ I think this is pretty cool. not too sure how stable/durable though, at least not until there are a lot more nodes providing service. also unsure of the legality vs. your average telco's consumer tos, but it's definitely not reselling. jeff pulver (crom bless him) seemed to be fairly amused, stuff like this fits
2012 Feb 01
2
ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way
Hi, I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route via a second network interface. Given: - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 Where eth0's network is a "back door" to the internet, and eth1's is the "front door", I believe I can
2016 Oct 10
2
Problem with one User after upgrade to 4.5.0
On 10/09/2016 12:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 11:50:42 -0600 > "Paul R. Ganci via samba"<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >On 10/09/2016 02:51 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> > >Have you by any chance got another 3001108 'xidNumber' in >>> > >idmap.ldb ? If you give a user a
2008 Feb 11
5
local root exploit
I saw that there is a local root exploit in the wild. http://blog.kagesenshi.org/2008/02/local-root-exploit-on-wild.html And I see my centos box still has: 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 yum says there are no updates... am I safe? Valent.
2017 Jun 28
3
Ok with mismatch between dead-markings in BUNDLE and bundled instructions?
Not sure if I could follow everything in this discussion regarding subregisters. But I think the problem posted by Mikael just happened to involve subregisters, and the discussions about subregisters is confusing when it comes to Mikaels original question/problem. I think that the bundle could look something like this just as well: BUNDLE %vreg1<def,dead> * %vreg1<def> =
2009 Jan 08
0
R ,SAS,New Tork Times etc
As someone who fwded initial story to both SAS and R lists, I find the messages on this forum and on SAS-L forum (which are publicly available) a contrast ( One list is partying like they won the World Series -the other one talks of either self denial.....or of self appraisal and anguish) http://www.listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S2=sas-l&q=&s=New+York+Times+&f=&a=Dec+2008&b=
2007 Mar 23
1
login shell not found "bug"
Hello folks at OpenSSH, I recently encountered a behavior of your software (it doesn't really deserve the name of "bug") that may be so rare that it is not worth correcting--however, if it was corrected, it would have saved me many hours of anguish. I recently set up a new PC with Ubuntu 6.10 and connected to my office NIS domain. Unfortunately, when I tried to log in via SSH with
2017 Jun 29
2
Ok with mismatch between dead-markings in BUNDLE and bundled instructions?
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 5:10 PM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Oh wait, vreg1 is indeed used. > Yeah, having a dead flag here sounds wrong. I mean on the instruction itself. On the bundle, that’s debatable. That would fit the semantic “if no side effect you can kill it” (here there is side effect, we define other vregs). > >> On
2005 Aug 21
2
Created Testimonials Page in wiki
I created a testimonials page. Feel free to add to this. http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/Testimonials -- Marc Perkel - marc at perkel.com Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
2013 Oct 17
1
Can't restore from GPFS snapshots, disk_free error
Hello, We're trying to set up a GPFS system with Samba running on top with CTDB managing it. I have snapshots set up to be accessible in every directory as the invisible directory .snap The snapshots are in the following format: /usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmcrsnapshot 1MB `TZ=GMT date + at GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S` ?and look like this from the UNIX level:
2007 Feb 21
2
how much performance penalty does this incur, scalar as a vector of one element?
I have been comparing R with other languages and systems. One peculiar feature of R is there is no scalar. Instead, it is just a vector of length one. I wondered how much performance penalty this deign cause, particular in situations with many scalars in a program. Thanks. Jason Liao, http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao Associate Professor of Biostatistics Drexel University School of Public
2010 Dec 02
0
default route with two nexthops and MASQUERADE problem
Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two