similar to: has_many relationship extensions and scoping rules

Hi guys, I have the strangest thing happening. The funny part is its doing exactly what I want to do, I just don''t understand how. Basically here is my model. class Role < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users has_and_belongs_to_many :rights def self.names names = Array.new() for role in Role.find :all names << role.name end return

Hi I have a has_many :through. It''s a basic mapping of Project id .... User id .... TeamMembers project_id user_id role What I would like to do is have different roles so I can have in the project model has_many :core_members, :through => :team_members, :source => :user but I would like to limit this to only those with the "core" role in the team members table for

Is there a reason I can''t find any information on using the onsubmit attribute with form_for? I''d hate to *gasp* hardcode the form tag in. chad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I''m working on a Rails app that needs to expose a RESTful web service. I''m curious to know some of the best practices as it relates to RESTful API design. Let''s say I have a set of related objects on the server side. I''ll use the venerable subscribers, subscriptions and magazines example to lay it out. class Subscriber < AR has_many :subscriptions

Hi folks, I have a question regarding validates_uniqueness_of, and similar before-filter-like events attempting to guarantee some DB state prior to modification. >From my reading of ActiveRecord, validate_uniqueness_of appears to cause a SELECT on the underlying table attempting to ensure that a record with ID(s) specified in the validates_uniqueness_of statement is not already present, prior

I''ve just about finished up work on a plugin similar to acts_as_taggable, but for comments instead which would allow you to attach comments (possibly even a threaded discussion if conbined with acts_as_tree) to any object. Is there anyone that would be interested in it? I don''t want to go throug the trouble of finding some way to distribute it unless I know that there is a

Hi all, I have this in my class: class Party < AR::B acts_as_ferret :store_class_name => true, :remote => true, :fields => (self.content_columns.map(&:name) rescue []) + %w(main_identifier) class << self # #count is also defined, omitted for clarity def find_with_destroyed_scope(*args) with_destroyed_scope do

Hey folks, Sorry for cross posting like this but this is an important announcement for all Ferret users. ** Description ** Firstly for those who don''t know, Ferret is a full-text search library which makes adding search to your application a breeze. It''s much faster than MySQL full-text search as well most other search libraries out there. It allows you to do Boolean (+ruby +

Hi all, Yesterday, I had some problems reading JPG files in my tests. Turns out the problem was that Windows Ruby doesn't set it's Tempfile to work in binary mode. Since I deploy on Linux, that has never been a big problem, but now I'm working on some software that works with binary files exclusively. Anyway, I am making this fix available as a Rails plugin. The details can be

Hi all, Yesterday, I had some problems reading JPG files in my tests. Turns out the problem was that Windows Ruby doesn't set it's Tempfile to work in binary mode. Since I deploy on Linux, that has never been a big problem, but now I'm working on some software that works with binary files exclusively. Anyway, I am making this fix available as a Rails plugin. The details can be

Hi ! In the following spec: context "A project owner" do specify "can assign roles to other users" do # ... end end I get the following cryptic error message: 1) NoMethodError in ''A project owner can assign roles to other users'' undefined method `session='' for #<Object:0xb741bed4>

Hi all, I am mocking the following Rails view (inside a partial): <%= render :partial => "forums/forum", :collection => forum_category.forums.readable_by(current_user? ? current_user : nil) %> My spec fails with the following message: 1) ActionView::TemplateError in ''forum_categories/index (anonymous user) should only render forums accessible to anonymous

Hi ! I would like to ascertain the following in a test case: @template.expects(:content_tag).with(:fieldset, :__any_arguments__i_dont_care) Is it possible to do so ? If so how ? If not, is it something the community wants ? Is it useful ? Thanks ! -- Fran?ois Beausoleil http://blog.teksol.info/ http://piston.rubyforge.org/

http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7124 I just attached a patch against 1.2 that cleanly applies to trunk too. This allows functional and integration tests to have the same interface to the xhr/xml_http_request method. The patch also includes a deprecation workaround when called without the appropriate parameters. If the patch could also be applied to the 1.2 branch, I would appreciate. The

Hi all ! This is my test: def test_destroy_xhr Article.expects(:find).with("1").returns(@article = mock("article")) @article.expects(:destroy).returns(true) delete :destroy, :id => 1, :format => :js assert_template "destroy.rjs" end And my implementation: def destroy @article.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html {

If with_scope has been called previously, how do I access the find conditions dynamically? I am asking because I am using a find_by_sql call (which clobbers the with_scope). How can I access the method scoping so that I can read it and incorporate it into my query manually? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Hi all ! Running this: @payout = stub_everything(:id => 141) Payout.stubs(:find).with(@payout.id).returns(@payout) Generates this warning: ./test/functional/payouts_controller_test.rb:22: warning: Object#id will be deprecated; use Object#object_id What am I missing ? :id is a fairly frequent method to override in Rails-based applications. I''m using Mocha from

Hi ! I''m using Mongrel 1.0.1 with --pid and --user/--group. The PID files are correctly owned by the user/group, but their permissions is 0666. Is that normal ? Shouldn''t it be something like 0664 ? Just curious to know if I''m wrong. Configurator has this (line 77): # Writes the PID file but only if we''re on windows. def write_pid_file if

Hi all, Google returns two results for this: http://www.google.ca/search?q=acts_as_ferret+shared_index+option&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:fr:official&client=firefox-a Both point to the ChangeLog, so I don''t really know if anybody used a shared index. From the RDoc, I know the option makes AAF "use a Ferret index that is shared by all classes..."

For a while, I''ve been getting that HMT is replacing HABTM. It appears that HMT can do all of what HABTM can do and more. The question is: Should I stop using HABTM? Let''s take a simple case: A case has many categories For a given category, there are certain valid statuses Category has_and_belongs_to_many :statuses Status has_and_belongs_to_many :categories Question: Is