similar to: About ip route 2 prio at tables

Hello all, I am having some difficults to make a routing rule work. I want that every P2P packages go to one interface (eth2 - cheaper link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame relay very expensive). I am using this script to make the mark and balance: ------- #!/bin/bash IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables" IP="/sbin/ip" #---- # Declara redes #----

Hi, I have a problem with my script. I have a debian with a kernel 2.6.8 patched with patch-2.6.8-ja1.diff of nano.txt site. I have 3 internet connections : - eth1 : - ip : 192.168.8.75 - gw : 192.168.8.73 - eth2 : - ip : 192.168.1.200 - gw : 192.168.1.2 - eth3 : - ip : 192.168.2.200 - gw : 192.168.2.1 and my eth0 for

Hello all I continue fighting with load balancing, I though it was easier :-/ Here is the script with my configuration #!/bin/sh IFI=eth0 IPI=192.168.10.155 NMI=24 IFE1=eth1 IPE1=192.168.1.128 NWE1=192.168.1.0 NME1=24 BRD1=192.168.1.255 GWE1=192.168.1.1 IFE2=eth2 IPE2=192.168.254.128 NWE2=192.168.254.0 NME2=24 BRD2=192.168.254.255 GWE2=192.168.254.254 ip link set $IFI up ip addr add

Hello all, I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together. This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32: $TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:10 This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it to go to the same

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hello all, I have a small ISP and I work all my clients networks over a routed network (now I am using 201.35.16.0/24 and 200.140.222.128/25 for my clients). The gateway server of the ISP is capable of running a web-cache (only http) using squid but I dont want that my clients go to the internet with the proxy/cache IP. Like when they enter in this site www.meuip.com.br it shows

Hello all, After many time reading a lot of stuff I am quite confident using LARTC to route my trafic. I am still working on QoS (by package type and so on) but it will stay in my studing class for a long time... ;) So lets go to my question... I mounted a router that makes my conections throug 2 external interfaces. Its working fine and my default gateway for entire network behind

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Hi all, I have implemented load balancing using the tutorial http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt ..The traffic is going through both my external network interface. I have some questions regarding this: ip route add default table 222 proto static \ nexthop via GWE1 dev IFE1 \ nexthop via GWE2 dev IFE2 The author explains the kernel chooses both the interfaces alternately (weight being 1

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing network with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to establish a new connection from any client node, it gives me two entries in the routing cache for that destination with different or same interface for those entries, but off the two entries only one route path is used for the transmission. the ip rule/route are as follows,

First of all, thanks to this group for the awesome documentation on the load balancing and thanks to http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt. I''m now balancing a DSL and Cable Modem account (DSL is 1.5/768 and Cable is 3/256). It took some work but I learned a lot along the way. For a few sites that I tend to download a lot from, I found that I could configure Flashget

Hello all, I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is the scope: client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool) and open an interface into my linux box interface for this client is ppp0 client has got an ip 1.1.1.2/32 and it is poiting to pppoe-server 1.1.1.1 So,

Hello all, I am still reading about my QoS rules and I need that one of my servers (that is into my LAN but has an routing ip address) did not get into the qos rules I have. So I want that all traffic coming or going to that specifc host did not get shapped by any traffic control and do not get even into a QoS class. How can I do this? Att, Nataniel Klug

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table

Hello all, I am with a doubt about QoS solution... I have a 4 Mbit backbone coming from the telco I use... This is the link I serve to my clients, so I make this classes: $TC qdisc add dev $DL root handle 1: htb default 60 CLASS="/sbin/tc class add dev $DL parent" $CLASS 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4096Kbit $CLASS 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 256Kbit ceil 3072Kbit burst 15k $CLASS 1:1

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hello, I am trying to make a load balance at my box using two conections. I have compile my kernel with this patch routes-2.6.13-12.diff (tha I get from this website: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#routes). The problem is that when I try to balance using weight sintaxe (i will put the script bellow) some conectios just drop. So I can enter some pages but other I could not...

Hello all, As I have promised I am sending my QoS rules. This now works fine with u32 classifier (and parent 1:0 that I could not understand why it did not worked well before). Att, Nataniel Klug ------------------------ #!/bin/sh #------ # Script de QoS Cyber Nett #------ # Nataniel Klug # suporte@cnett.com.br #------ TC="/sbin/tc" IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >