similar to: gypsy, and not only

Hey, fellow LART controlllers, I''d like to ask if someome has a real esfq experience with HTB class hierarchy and esfq qdiscs. Lets say that I want to unite the connections to 10 client PCs with u32 or fw filters (doesn''t matter which one in fact) into one HTB class with esfq qdisc at the end. Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to? As

>Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. > >I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and >while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to >know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. > >I have two university buildings with a 1mb connection to the Internet. The >two buildings (on either side of town) are

Hello one more time, As others seem to already asked without reply, I''m getting lower speed rates than specified via ingress. How do I know. Because I have this in my script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # Filter intranet traffic, so fit it to intranet speed tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match ip src $Q_2_HOSTS \ match ip dst

I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs, even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt. To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c . This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with 256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it''s +45. For the many who have 128 up it should limit them to +90 rather than +180. Andy.

The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB''s accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer''s thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ),

Can anyone suggest a package or code for modeling a hysteresis process in R? I'm currently modeling a certain dataset with a GAM using mgcv, something like gam(y~ s(x, by=z) + z, family = Gamma(link=log),data=data) and getting fits with about 9 estimated degrees of freedom in the smooth for each value of z. FWIW, z is a treatment applied to a system which should have made an improvement,

Hi again, sorry to be such a bother. I got my setup to work with kernel 2.6.8.1, however the two machines where I need to implement the shaping are running a 2.4.27 kernel. I have applied the infamous June patch (htbfair.diff) already, and recompiled the modules. And I am using the tc that comes with htb3.6-020525.tgz. While I can see the packets going into the right class, it does not

During my tests I''m starting to feel stupid :). Traffic shaping works quite on its own. System: RedHat 7.3, RedHat kernel 2.4.18-18.7.xsmp, HTB version 3.6, interfaces eth0 and eth1 are acting as bridge br0. If TCP shaping almost works, it just exceeds limits UDP is not shaped. Traffic flows PC=>eth0=>eth1=>PC. Statistics shown is for just UDP traffic (1mbit of small udp

Hi. The configuration script is at the bottom. My configuration looks similar to this: imq0 | 1:1 (12mbit) | 1:2 (10mbit) | 3:0 | 3:1 (256kbit) / \ 3:2 3:3 icmp (rest) both 3:2 and 3:3 have rate 1kbit ceil 256kbit Icmp bucklet have priority 1 (better), "rest" bucklet have prio 2 (worse) I tested the script with heavy download

Hello everyone: As it is known, when you limit uplink bandwidth it usually gets downlink bandwidth to a lower value. I just want to know what is the optimal configuration for eth1 and imq0 according to some variables of tc(HTB), txqueuelen, mtu, etc. to make these packet flows less independent on an ethernet based network. Thank you in advance. -Diego

hmm HFSC ? where can i find more informations and examples about the *linux* HFSC ? http://trash.net/~kaber/hfsc/ does not help here -- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Im using a Linux machine with standard pc hardware with 3 seperate PCI network interfaces to operate as a DiffServ core router using Linux traffic control. The machine is a P4 2.8ghz, 512mb RAM running fedora core 3 with the 2.6.12.3 kernel. All links and network interfaces are full duplex fast ethernet. IP forwarding is enabled in the kernel. All hosts on the network have their time sychronised

I´m shaping with htb with a kernel 2.4.25 compiled with PSCHED_CPU. What i´m noticing (in mrtg) is that traffic coming in to eth0 (internet side) is much bigger than eth1(Lan side). I think this is due to packets being dropped right? In this case, is there any way to avoid this? because right now traffic coming from the router is being wasted right? This is the output of tc: tc -s class show

Hello. So, LVM is cool, having different partitions for different stuff is cool, and of course Ext4 is cool and *reliable*. So, we create some logical partitions and put ext4 on them, reserving LVM space for growing those partitions or even making new ones later. The thing is, I would like to keep every filesystem as small as it can be, but without degrading the performance too

What''s wrong... I have Celeron 633MHz nd 768Mb RAM. When I''m running my script everything is OK, but when I''m connecting Internet and LAN link computer is hanging. But when i dissconnect this everything is OK. I have 500 users, 1500 classes and 3000 filters. Is it normal? What should I do?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m absolutely new to tc and found The Ultimate Traffic Conditioner to be exactly what I wanted as a starting point. Now the script doesn''t behave as I expected though, which applies to both the CBQ and HTB versions, the latter of which being my preference. The only changes made to the script are these assignments:

> As you can tell, the AAGC integration with speex was really a classic > hack. Instead of re-creating the hack, what's probably best here is to > integrate AAGC back into speex, and have a proper API. Agreed here. If you can come up with a clean patch to add that feature, it's something I'd like to see in Speex. > For those of you just tuning in, what I call

Hi, I have an Eaton/MGE EX 11 RT UPS (uses the mge-shut driver) and while I was testing it I found that it would turn back on straight after power was restored. I had a look but I couldn't find a setting which would let me tell it to charge to (say) 50% before turning the load back on. Does anyone know if this is possible? A setting like this would provide some hysteresis for successive

Tom Harper wrote: > Steve, > > The main problem I am having with the system is clipping off the start > of someone's speech when they first start talking- the ends of the > sentences > seem to be handled properly. I am wondering whether this is the fault > of the > audio playback system or whether this is a speex issue- I don't seem to get that; I suppose

Hi, New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It''s for a production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel. Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ? Are there special patches to apply ? EC. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /