Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Multiple ISP Links"
2007 Jan 19
10
DGD patch not detecting dead gateway
Hello all!
I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel
2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing
well, but when one link is dropped it continues to try it.
At the end of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt it is said to ping
gateway 1 and gateway 2, for the kernel to know if that route is
working, but since my linux is connected to the links
2007 Mar 02
8
DNAT and Load Balancing
Hi all!
After that good thread "DGD patch not detecting dead gateway" I was
able to set up a Load Balancing with ping based DGD (without Julian
Anastasov patch). But now I''m facing a new problem and tried some
options, with only partial solutions.
I made a script based on
http://www.mail-archive.com/lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl/msg16257.html (Thank
you Manish Kathuria),
2006 Feb 09
8
load balancing and failover
Hi,
A friend of mine has 2 lines of 512kbps terminated in two Linux boxes.
He now want to remove those 2 boxes and have some device which will
loadbalance the two ISPs and also have a failover arrangement. But he
has agreed to give me a chance to do it on Linux for my own
satisfication.
Is this easy to do with lartc? How do I go about it exactly? I have
very less time to do it since his
2007 May 11
2
Re: DGD patch not detecting dead gateway
I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with
ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to
do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route)
anyway if you use the script, right?
Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the routing table entry, but if
you have a dynamic IP for the WAN interface (PPPoE, DHCP etc), this
approach
2007 Jun 21
23
Redundant internet connections.
(I know that what I''m wanting to do can be done, but for some reason I
can not get it to work for the life of me. I think I have been staring
at it too long and too closely.)
I have two different internet connections from two cooperating ISPs. I
also have a small 8 block of IPs that are globally routable that both
ISPs will route to me via my world facing globally routable IPs that
2012 Sep 26
7
Routing issue
Hello,
This is on Centos 6 and not something I think is wrong with Centos 6
but I am looking to see if anybody else has experienced this and
if there is solution. So thanks up front for indulging me.
Because Linux makes routing decisions before SNAT it is causing
problems when trying to use FTP with two upstream providers in
a load balanced setup.
Other than ftp, things seem to work OK. Below
2009 Nov 09
4
GUID Partition Tables and Ext3 Partition Size
Hello,
Does CentOS 5.4 support large ( > 2 TB) external storage devices using
GPT (GUID Partition Tables), while the main OS resides on smaller hard
disks using MBR. In this scenario, what can be the largest possible
size of an ext3 partition (and filesystem) which can be created on the
storage array under CentOS 5.4 ?
Thanks,
Manish
2007 Dec 03
4
x86_64 versus i386
Hello,
On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
installing either x86_64 or the i386 distribution. I would like to
know your experiences with the x86_64 port. How does it compare with
the i386 distribution in terms of stability, reliability and
performance ? How significant are the performance benefits gained by
using the x86_64 linux instead of i386 on the same
2012 Oct 18
3
Linux Software RAID 1 - Unequal Sized Hard Disks
Has anyone created or rebuilt a Linux Software RAID having mirrored
partitions on unequal sized hard disks ? There is a CentOS 5 server
having two 400 GB hard disks with five mirrored partitions (software
RAID 1) and one of the hard disks is dying. Since new 400 GB HDDs are
not available here, we are exploring the possibility of replacing the
faulty hard disk with one of a higher capacity (500 GB
2006 Feb 07
3
Please help in choosing the right patches
Dear Sir,
Please help me in building the right solution.
My requirement is:
1st I want to club both ISP bandwidth to get 512kbps.
2nd, In normal condition, it should be in Load balancing.
3rd , In ISP Failover condition, traffic will automatically route to working ISP.
What I have:
I have installed the RHEL 3.0 with 3 Network Card. Kernel is 2.4.21-9EL
I have the link from two ISP both
2007 Feb 17
3
Two ADSL links and one gateway only
Hello!
I read the Split access and Load balancing sections into LARTC
(Chapter 4). However I have one gateway only and the LARTC says about
2 links. I need to know how to make a load balance with my links.
Thanks in advance.
Eriberto - Brazil
2006 Jan 13
3
multiple isp + nat
I configured multiple isp (actually only multiple gw) according
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html.
Now NAT (Internet) seems to work, both external interfaces work ( I
didnt configure load balancing because I dont need it). However I have
problem that I can not ping from NAT to public ip of my Linux box.
Problem is that I can not connect from 192.168.1.0/24 network to
services
2011 Jul 18
1
Wireless Interface Does Not Connect Automatically At StartUp
I have recently installed CentOS 6 on a system with a Realtek 8180L
wireless card. The wireless card is detected properly and uses the
rtl8180 driver. But it connects to our wireless network only after
logging to the Desktop Environment (GNOME) and using the Network
Manager Applet. In order to make the wireless card connect to the
network automatically at system start up, I edited the Connection
2002 Sep 10
2
Traceroute
How do I allow traceroute to reach my server? Pings work fine but
traceroute stops at the last hop before my server. If I shut off the
firewall it reaches it fine.
PING danicar.net (24.222.246.120): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=237 time=104.0 ms
64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=237 time=74.9 ms
64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=237 time=90.6
2007 Jan 22
2
two internet providers
hello
i have slackware installed and i have two internet connections ,
ADSL(2,5mbps) + CableModem(1mbps)
i want to share the connections in a small network
NAT for the ADSL connection, and a proxy server for the cablemodem
connection
i searched all over the internet (probably not where i was supposed to)
but i could''n find a solution
if someone could give me a tip i would really
2010 Oct 18
2
Password Expiry
Hello,
Is there any command / option available on CentOS to expire a user's
password immediately ? I remember using "passwd -e" on some other
distribution but the -e option does not seem to be present on CentOS
5.x.
Thanks,
Manish
2007 Nov 06
1
dead router detection
Hi all
I would like to know what happens with a dead router in a multipath
configuration like the one presented
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
Do i need to monitor dead routers and reconfigure ?
Guillermo
2005 Dec 31
1
Multiple ISP Links - Gateway Not Getting Restored
I have been successfully implementing load balancing gateways for
multiple ISP links at various locations using Julian''s patches and as
suggested in LARTC HowTo. At one location, one of the ISPs is providing
connectivity through a PPOE DSL link which has to be dialled in
everytime to connect. The gateway has been configured on a Fedora Core 3
based system and I have recompiled the
2008 Jan 29
1
RHEL / CentOS Kernel Updates
How are the updated kernels released by Red Hat / Cent OS related to
the latest vanilla kernels ? Are the changes, new features and
drivers, etc. available in the newer kernels also ported to the
updated kernels released by Red Hat in their entirety ?
For the lifetime of a distribution like RHEL 4 or RHEL 5, Red Hat
would stick to the same major and minor number of the kernel and would
just
2011 Jan 16
2
Mount Point Ownership & Group
I am facing problems assigning the owner and group to an ext3
filesystem being mounted from an external storage. I created a mount
point /vol and changed its owner and group to alpha and beta
respectively (as required). The ext3 filesystem (LV from the external
storage) was then mounted on /vol using the mount command. However,
after mounting the filesystem the owner and group of /vol changed