similar to: Problems in Bandwidth limiting-Help needed!!!

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi, I have a router/firewall running Linux (like the most of you) and I wanted to do some traffic control. I''ve created an root PRIO qdisc like the example in paragraph 9.5.3.1 (http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN903) with three SFQ child-classes. I wanted for interactive (ssh, telnet, ftp-control) and dns-traffic to be placed in the first queue, http should go in

I copied and tried to adapt to my necessities the excellent script of Pedro Larroy, but I am inexperienced in QoS and I have doubts. I have cablemodem to Internet 1024kbit down and 256kbit up, through eth0. The LAN has eth1 and NAT. I formed the band so that shaping goes by the eth1 (of the LAN) with bandwidth maximum CEIL=768. But I observe that the traffic sometimes accelerates and other

Hi there, i tried to setup up a Linuxbridge for prioritize some interactive (Citrix / https) Traffic to 1.2.3.4 on my ADSL Link, but i think it work not correct. Overview: Router <->Linux Bridge<->internal Net eth1 eth0 This is my Script (with friendly support from the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control Howto) #!/bin/sh # # ADSL

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

I copied and tried to adapt to my necessities the excellent script of Pedro Larroy, but I am inexperienced in QoS and I have doubts. I have cablemodem to Internet 1024kbit down and 256kbit up, through eth0. The LAN has eth1 and NAT. I formed the band so that shaping goes by the eth1 (of the LAN) with bandwidth maximum CEIL=768. But I observe that the traffic sometimes accelerates and other

Hello lartc maintainers and users! I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic. The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and fwmark for metropolitan packets. I have two root classes (simulating two circuits) : 1:1 for internet and 1:3 for metropolitan.

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be:

My hfsc rule .. tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle 1: root hfsc iptables -t mangle -N ms-all iptables -t mangle -N ms-all-chains iptables -t mangle -N ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp --dport 4444 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp -m

-> Hi! -> -> I''ve a Linux Box that I want to apply a filter -> in order to limit FTP salient traffic from my -> linux box to internet. -> -> I''ve a: -> Red Hat 7.2 -> Kernel 2.4.20 (with HTB built in!) -> iptables 1.2.7a -> -> Also, I get "tc" binnary package from HTB home page. -> -> I have a script in

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

Hello. I''m newbie with QoS. I read some articles and I have a question on You. If you have time to spare, it would be great if you reply. Here is my problem. I''m on wireless network(no earnig comunity). We got 2/2Mbit(soon 4/4) for 100 people(sharing link). Not long ago people start screaming that their games don''t work good(lagging). So I add to our qos class games

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

Hey Andreas, how i catch this traffic using L7 filter?, i´ve installed l7 filter now, but i don´t kwnow to use the kind of filter...!!! Can you help me? Thx.- Terraja-based 2007/4/29, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl>: > > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.