similar to: iproute problem

Hello, In one of our project we need to connect one IMX 27 based baord which ahs a internal FEC controller & an MPC 8323RDb baord which has a Built in Network controller. We need to connect the IMX27 based board to MPC board thro cross cable & MPC baord has wlan AP card . Basically we want to communicate from IMX27 to wireless network. Hence we are planning to make follwoing arranage

 Hello, everybody.  This one''s got me stumped.  What I''m trying to do is have two networks--192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0--with SMB and WINS running between them.  So far I can mount SMB shares allright, but I can''t browse by WINS names across the router.  I''ve posted this question on Linuxquestions.org; you''ll find the details there.  Here are my

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589 Summary: MARK doesn't work properly with incoming traffic Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

Can anybody tell me if it makes a difference if domU''s have separate LVM volume groups? For instance, the Xen User Manual ( http://tx.downloads.xensource.com/downloads/docs/user/#SECTION03330000000000000000) says, when setting up a domU''s disks with LVM, to do a vgcreate vg /dev/sda10 Should each domU have it''s own volume group, or can all the domU''s share

Hello, everybody! I have two networks (192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0) connected across a wireless router with two NICs. I can ping everything allright via ip address, but not by name across subnets. Things on the same subnet ping allright by name. Here are the smb.conf files for my two master browsers: #(192.168.1.249) [global] workgroup = THEBAND netbios name = Yesteryear

I've just tried setting up a Shrike (9) version of Redhat. Using the medium settings of lokkit, then adding manually accept commands for ports 137/udp 138/udp, 139/tcp and 445/tcp, I thought I should have been ready to go. This isn't the case, however. I know it's not the smb.conf settup because when I kill iptables samba works. When iptables IS running however, it will respond

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup

Hi, I''m trying to use shorewall for a RAS dialup solution We have networks we need to connect to with the same ranges internally (i.e. 2 separate users with a 192.168.0.0/24 range). We connect to these via a pptp tunnel (or isdn) The problem we have is that we need to access these networks all the time, so allocate them a range from our internal range. This will then be NATed to the

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0570 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0570.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 31a7240ff770ddd2f18715bccd1907f290b22468f2fa7d654e912e242cdeafcb iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1814 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11b560b8b12bef924870b17dd0580fe72624e17d692d7206870738a5999abbc6 iproute-2.6.32-33.el6_6.i686.rpm

Subject says it all... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0417 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0417.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8c69bdfc16cc4ddccb73c38491522f13b2b560caec4bfca88112050d750180a1 iproute-2.6.32-23.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1276 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 866debd9507a39fa83ccfc6bdba54ad872b56220db2eba7798145a080423611b iproute-3.10.0-54.el7_2.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0808 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0808 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: abf0bf331ab7c24a12bf898ac03213e8fc8b812bc63d938c28f6aa278c59573a iproute-4.11.0-14.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3985 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3985 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 15715636a7e96f4bc322dd352ee4acf3b67a2c903d3fe91b9384e7e57484f387 iproute-4.11.0-25.el7_7.2.x86_64.rpm

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:15:39 +0100 "PIOTREK H." <komarekmz@tlen.pl> wrote: > Welcome > > I have a problem with the new iproute "iproute2-2.6.37.tar.bz2 07-Jan-2011 9:18 (the problem from version 2010 to 2011). > Three problems: > a) with filters for UDP traffic > problem affects only the queuing traffic to the machine on which you work qos > In the case

Good morning, I''m writing to ask for collaboration in finding an improvement to a particular process. Today: To get traffic for our IDS sensors and a billing system, we collect everything at our core switches (2) by connecting a SPAN port from each switch to a server (so, 2 interfaces collecting traffic). That server changes the destination MAC address on all traffic to that of

i have both packages round, what are the diffs iproute2 justa follow on too iproute? Chris K Ellsworth _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1153 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1153.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e8c793f6d9912b63c3281b2bd94ef978bd30df485d17b56b6c7df44b5ccce649 iproute-2.6.18-15.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

I'm getting a strange error while rebuilding iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... rpmbuild --rebuild iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... ./normal >normal.dist *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x08491050 *** /bin/sh: line 1: 5236 Aborted ./normal >normal.dist make[1]: *** [normal.dist] Error 134 ... + install -m 644 tc/normal.dist