similar to: load balancing over 4 lines to one provider

I have a linux AP with prism2 (hostap) wireless nic. I whant to filter traffic that pass betwen clients of the AP, this is layer 2 traffic (802.11) and netfilter does not sees it, at first i think in physdev target, but is for layer2 bridged interfaces, and this is not the case. There is a way to filter layer2 traffic independet if it is from a bridged iface or not? -- Luciano

We have recently purchased a B410P Digium 4* ISDN-2 card with hardware EC. On the same server, I also have a regular Digium 4-channel PSTN-card (TDM410P ?), used to interface to some analog devices, a.o. 2 fax machines. For faxing, EC needs to be off (or so I understand from the archives). How can I switch EC off for an ISDN B-channel if a fax is coming in? Z.

My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

On my VPN-gateway, I like to check every minute it all tunnels (VPN-clients) are up. Here in Holland, we have fixed IPs on ADSL, so I could do it using "netstat -anp | grep tincd" etc. Now I have some customers in Belgium, with dynamic ADSL IP-addresses, so I can no longer use netstat. So I looked into having tincd telling me which connections are up by sending a signal (much

Hi Ppl I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of just plain masquerading my outbound masquerading now works but my inbound port forwarding doesnt work would

That could have gone smoother. I had many problems with the NFS install on my firewall then once I got the server back up, mail delivery was broken :- ( I still haven''t gotten ulogd to run under RH9.0 but everything else seems to be working ok... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

Hi all, I have a debian server with 4 network cards: The first card is used to connect to public network and this network connects with a big router. The Second, third and fourth cards are used by other networks. The first card used a dinamic route with the big router. The other cards used a static route with a little router. All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first

Just an idea... We all know that NN under Windows is at best non predictable and totally impossible to use since many times machines are not showing themselves and so on.... We all know also that Samba is never the problem with that, it's just the M$ protocol. So my idea: if some clever Window$ programmer makes an app that is just doing the same: You launch the app you have the list of

Signed-off-by: Loiseleur Michel <mloiseleur at linagora.com> --- app/models/vm.rb | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/models/vm.rb b/app/models/vm.rb index 88e0aef..0be3f89 100644 --- a/app/models/vm.rb +++ b/app/models/vm.rb @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ class Vm < ActiveRecord::Base find(:all, :conditions=>{:state=>Task::STATE_QUEUED})

Hi, from time to time, in times like today where the whole world is grabbing SUSE-9.2 and/or debian-30r4, I really like to condemn those other anon rsync server admins (you know, the successors of the traditional unix ftp server admins). They usually have within their /etc/rsyncd.conf a line like timeout = <very low> because they are thinking "less" there is "better for

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

I am trying to setup a centos 7.1 vncserver I cannot believe they went from a relatively easy process in 6 to the "crazyness" that is 7. I did the following: yum install tigervnc-server cp /lib/systemd/system/vncserver at .service /etc/systemd/system systemctl daemon-reload edit /etc/systemd.system/vncserver at .service

Hi, I have a PPPoE server running on a linux box that accepts multiple PPPoE sessions from clients. I'd like to bridge each of the sessions together so that it looks like just one interface. Below is a diagram: br0 | ------------------------------- | | | | ppp0 ppp1 eth3 ppp3 I've read that anything can be bridge as long as MTU is the same.

Hi everybody. First of all, I'm not subscribed to the list, so please CC me in answers. Second, please don't kill me :) I'm suffering the fact that if I, as a developer, want to connect to another machine via SSH, I must use a third party library[1]. Because this is a reimplemetation of the protocol, it's always lagging behind, which only makes sense. Personally, it also

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hi All - I looked for mention of this in the archives but wasn''t able to find anything. This isn''t even an advanced routing question, it should be a dirt-simple, basic, no-brainer, routine routing job. But I''m not getting it! I have a Linux iptables based firewall system that is making me crazy. The gist of the problem is, even when I turn off all firewall rules

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal xendomains saves the active domains when shutting down. it get the list of active domains from the following command[1]: xm list | grep -v '^Name' the output of "xm list" is like: lichen:~# xm list Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0