similar to: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix missing recow roots when making btrfs filesystem

Now we set @refs to 2 on creating a new extent buffer, meanwhile we allocate the needed free space, but we don''t give enough free_extent_buffer() to reduce the eb''s references to zero so that the eb can finally be freed, so the problem is we has decrease the referene count of backrefs to zero, which ends up releasing the space occupied by the eb, and this space can be allocated

When replaying a log tree with qgroups enabled, tree_mod_log_rewind does a sanity-check of the number of items against the maximum possible number. It calculates that number with the nodesize of fs_root. Unfortunately fs_root is not yet set at this stage. So instead use the nodesize from tree_root, which is already initialized. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> ---

While testing raid-auto-repair patches I''m going to send out later, I just found the very last bug in my current scrub patch series: Changelog v4->v5: - fixed a deadlock when fixup is taking longer while scrub is about to end Original message follows: ------------------------ This patch set introduces two new features for scrub. They share the backref iteration code which is the

We do log replay in a single transaction, so it''s not good to do unbound operations during replaying log. This patch makes orphan inodes cleanup executed after replaying log. It also avoid doing other unbound operations such as truncating a file during replaying log. These unbound operations are postponed to the orphan inode cleanup stage. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng

Document those places in the btrfs code which are BUGing on non-fatal error conditions that should be handled by proper error paths. This makes it easier to distinguish between what needs fixing versus which BUG_ON''s we might want to keep (to trap code bugs, unexpected inconsistencies, etc). Do this with a trivial macro, ''btrfs_fixable_bug_on'' which just defines to

This patch adds mixed back ref support for btrfs programs. The mixed back ref is a new disk format. back compatilibity is still not implemented. To try the new disk format, you need fresh formatted btrfs. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h btrfs-progs-2/crc32c.h --- btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h 2008-09-30 16:50:58.898877720 +0800

Balance will create reloc_root for each fs root, and it''s going to record last_snapshot to filter shared blocks. The side effect of setting last_snapshot is to break nocow attributes of files. So it turns out that checking last_snapshot does not always ensure that a node/leaf/file_extent is shared. That''s why shared node/leaf needs to search extent tree for number of

We at Wiseguys are looking into GlusterFS to run our Internet Archive. The archive stores webpages collected by our spiders. The test setup consists of three data machines, each exporting a volume of about 3.7TB and one nameserver machine. File layout is such that each host has it's own directory, for example the GlusterFS website would be located in:

There were a whole bunch and I was doing it for other things. I haven''t tested these error paths but at the very least this is better than panicing. I''ve only left 2 BUG_ON()''s since they are logic errors and I want to replace them with a ASSERT framework that we can compile out for production users. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> ---

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply

Reserve metadata space for extent tree, checksum tree and root tree Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:26:38.327697818 +0800 +++ 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:30:01.883697869 +0800 @@ -682,21 +682,15 @@ struct btrfs_space_info { u64 bytes_reserved; /* total bytes the allocator has

Hello everyone. This is the support for default single-device configuration. Subvolumes are _allowed_. Transparent compression is not allowed. Leafsize != 4K is not allowed. Nodesize != 4K is not allowed. Grub-0.97+btrfs doesn''t understand exotic things like preallocated extents (e.g. files composed by fallocate(2), posix_fallocate(3)). Also grub-0.97 doesn''t check btrfs

The kernel side for rescan, which is needed if you want to enable qgroup tracking on a non-empty volume. The first patch splits btrfs_qgroup_account_ref into readable ans reusable units. The second patch adds the rescan implementation (refer to its commit message for a description of the algorithm). The third patch starts an automatic rescan when qgroups are enabled. It is only separated to

This patch introduce extent buffer cache for every i-node. By this way, we can save the search time and reduce the lock contention of the root because we needn''t search the item from the root of b+ tree. Implementation: - add two pointers of extent buffer into btrfs_inode struct, one for nodes/leaves of fs/file tree, the other for nodes/leaves of the log tree. - add a variant to tell

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 12:33:00 -0500 > From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@ENTERACT.COM> > On almost all Unix operating systems, having superuser access in a > chroot() jail is still dangerous. In some recent revisions of 4.4BSD > operating systems, root can trivially escape chroot(), as well. I was thinking about possible attacks

"btrfs subvolume list" gets a new option "--fields=..." which allows to specify which pieces of information about subvolumes shall be printed. This is necessary because this commit also adds all the so far missing items from the root_item like the received UUID, all generation values and all time values. The parameters to the "--fields" option is a list of items to

Filesystem rebalancing (BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE) affects the entire filesystem and may run uninterruptibly for a long time. This does not seem to be something that an unprivileged user should be able to do. Reported-by: Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Hiya, Recently, a btrfs file system of mine started to behave very poorly with some btrfs kernel tasks taking 100% of CPU time. # btrfs fi show /dev/sdb Label: none uuid: b3ce8b16-970e-4ba8-b9d2-4c7de270d0f1 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 4.25TB devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.52TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 2.70TB used 1.49TB path /dev/sda4 devid 3 size

This patch does two things. First we no longer explicitly read in the blocks we''re trying to readahead. For things like balance_level we may never actually use the blocks so this just adds uneeded latency, and balance_level and split_node will both read in the blocks they care about explicitly so if the blocks need to be waited on it will be done there. Secondly we no longer drop the

Rewrite btrfs_drop_extents by using btrfs_duplicate_item, so we can avoid calling lock_extent within transaction. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 7 +- fs/btrfs/file.c | 659 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +- 5 files changed, 277