similar to: samba 3 - smb2 cpu usage

First run of puppet performs a configsync and an attempt to load the downloaded plugins, the provider fails to be found by puppet in this first run, another re-run of puppet is needed for the provider to work, see debug output below. Is this a bug or am I missing something you think? The error in short: err: /Stage[main]/Ibe::Slave/Logical_volume[mysql]: Could not evaluate: No ability to

Andreas, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the > samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the > scenario and the findings, I have two simple questions: > > 1) I plan to use a new, reproducible test scenario with 2000 random small > files with a file length

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

First off, I'm a little confused but I've been trying to do some research and still have some questions... (please forgive me!) I'm trying to figure out the "best" (ie. fastest) way to connect from Ubuntu to Windows Server 2008. I can use SMB, SMB2, or NFS.

My issue may be related to this bug: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/13858 "Custom types in environments require loading into master''s libdir" However, now I''m not so sure, This was working previously with a given client. However, after trying on a fresh client, it''s failing with: err: Could not run Puppet configuration client: Could not find a

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535]

We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and a CentOS 7 machine. Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. - Copying to a smb share on a Mac seems to work, but is also much slower. - Using a normal Gigabit network

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

Hi Samba Users, I'm in the process of building a Samba4 CTDB /GPFS Cluster joined as a member server to AD that also supports ACL's . It has taken some time but almost everything is working now :) . My one outstanding issue is editing files using Excel 2007 on Windows 7 results in a 'Document not saved' error. I believe this is an issue with the SMB2 protocol as I can edit the same

Hello, Thank you ! I add server min protocol = SMB2_02 to smb.cnf All clients are now using SMB2_10 as minimum protocol version May you indicate me the difference between "client min protocol" and "server min protocol" ? "server min protocol" is to use on a domain member "client min protocol" is to use in which case ? Should I also set client min

Hello, To thank you for telling me if this message is not posted on the good list. After installing Xen 4 on a workstation HP Z400, the hypervisor is extremely slow, both on a Fedora machine on a Debian Squeeze, whether in 32-bit or 64-bit version. Unable to install a DomU. The problem seems to come from the hardware configuration of the HP Z400 - Xeon - W3550-4 processors - 16 GB of

Hi, I have been adding support for the puppetlabs-lvm module so that I can use puppet resource <lvm_type>. I have most of the coding done but can''t seem to get certain parameters in the output. https://github.com/logicminds/puppetlabs-lvm/commit/deb258231f5a4dc6da7c0d65a7153846b8766b3e example: def self.instances filesystems.map { | fs | new(:name =>

>> - smbclient [no -m option] is OK and slow (uses default SMB1/NT1?) >> - mount.cifs -o vers=1.0 is OK and slow >> - smbclient -m SMB2 (or -m SMB3) fails > The above is the interesting case, as this is much > easier to debug (in user space) than the kernel > client. > > Can you give more details on *exactly* HOW smbclient -mSMB3 > fails ? This is really

Hi Jeremy, Hi Steve, Hi Ronnie, thanks for your replies and the profound discussion. I think, it's best to demonstrate my problem case along an real world example: The following log of a console sesssion shows how I am doing the mounts on behalf Linux Kernel CIFS-FS Module on the client side against a Samba 4.5 file server (both running on Debian Stretch 9.8) via SMB/CIFS resp. SMB2 protocol:

I've recently connected a Samba server to our domain (ourdomain.dom) and configured it to send authentication requests to AD. I can successfully authenticate ourdomain.com users from the Samba server. ourdomain.com has a trust with a sister company (theirdomain.com). With this trust we can assign NTFS permissions to users within theirdomain.com to, for example, file servers on ourdomain.com.

I've been following the forums on this subject. I am still having problems implimenting this at my site. I am trying to replace a Novell 5 file server doing single server signon(workstation manager) with a linux/samba server and a W2K ADS server. I tried this with slackware 10.0, samba 3.0.10, MIT krb5 v 3.1 5, openldap-2.1.22 and got it pretty close (could login wihtout password) but had