similar to: CESA-2013:0815 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b9e114cf2ee8faa6b61807170c49720e busybox-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm 62c881a1bae28333e19dbffa2a4fed45 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 703b27bf88b2312b4c54f5c53070aa6b busybox-1.2.0-9.el5.i386.rpm 2a9d424a1bd0b5ee7b70b9969ca17769 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-9.el5.i386.rpm Source:

Hello I've got two prefixes, one /48 and one /64 let's say these two 2001:db8:0815::/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::/64 the router has on it's ethernet interface the following to IPv6 addresses: 2001:db8:0815::1/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1/64 a windows box has 2001:db8:0815::17/48 and 2001:db8:0815::1 as it's gateway a linux box has 2001:db8:4711:cafe::11/64 and 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1 as

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 54a81e3f18521316144e0d2b67729b9d busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 6fca513b911c5fdfe4d5a2fafe1b4290 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 3715f213e1cd45237763100d0066dbe2 busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.i386.rpm e938723e6727624a735fbeefbcb6b2b9 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.i386.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0815 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0de61eb9464a5fbbb53bb37d24d6bba56a6c6290eb0b1b2687c4a0621a885a1f httpd-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0815 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0815 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 7b5a6fc50bc8275994f811b047643572b6355353fd2224ac4d42e5e758f0c38c pango-1.42.4-2.el7_6.i686.rpm 4d7d465674aeabb2d809fe1ca1012e7ec3daeca8e76ddbc9422e6b60c396b3f4

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0815 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0815 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 9ff75bf16b580432dd3c7bcbd00153572de1e59bd5da118d23c8186a4f4341b6 firefox-68.6.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ERRATA - ------ The original announcement for the Samba vulnerability identified by CAN-2004-0815 reported that Samba versions 3.0.0 - 3.0.5 inclusive were subject the remote file access bug. Later research has confirmed that *only* Samba 3.0.x <= 3.0.2a contains the exploitable code. The Samba Team expresses sincere apologies for any confusion

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ERRATA - ------ The original announcement for the Samba vulnerability identified by CAN-2004-0815 reported that Samba versions 3.0.0 - 3.0.5 inclusive were subject the remote file access bug. Later research has confirmed that *only* Samba 3.0.x <= 3.0.2a contains the exploitable code. The Samba Team expresses sincere apologies for any confusion

There was an upgrade on a couple of our servers yesterday, mid-afternoon our time, of httpd and httpd-devel, and suddenly SiteMinder (bleah) stopped working correctly, and is now pegging a cpu, according to top. So, as a last resort, I tried downgrading both of them. When I did so, the server that uses ssl *erased* mod-ssl, not downgrading it, and I'll have to find where I can get the previous

I have set up a local filesystem repo thus: # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/LocalFiles.repo # LocalFiles.repo # # This repo is used with rpms contained in a local filesystem repo # created with createrepo. You can use this repo and yum to install # items directly off the local disk. # # To use this repo with the other repos: # yum --enablerepo=localfiles yum --nogpgcheck <yum command> # # or to

I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that would install httpd without including it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

What is showing in the apache error log? ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, May 07, 2015 04:28:16 PM -0400 > From: John <tuxfed at gmail.com> > > Directories permissions: 755 Files permissions: 644 > > On 15-05-07 04:21 PM, John wrote: >> I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned >> by apache:apache >>

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

More specifically -- when you get the "not found" in the browser there should be an entry logged in the error log. E.g., tail the error log, issue a request, and see what you see. The error log entry will show the details of what is being requested and generally gives strong hints as to why it can't be found (pathing, access, etc.). If you don't get an entry in the error log that

Hello, I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system. I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed. After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9. I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21 applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9? There was a security fix just

On 16/12/14 18:15, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 16.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb For at ll: >> On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For at ll wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, >>>> (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and

Does anyone have any experience getting LIRC 0.9.0 up and running on CentOS 6.6? I have the packages from EPEL installed: lirc.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-doc.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-libs.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-remotes.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel And my IR