similar to: tc patched doesn''t work with WFQ TOO

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was searching for few days in this mailing list but I didn''t find how to solve my tc problem. Feel free to ask me more details if you think there are relevant. I''m using a Gentoo 2.4.32-gentoo-r2 and I''m trying to test a *weighted fair queuing* (WFQ) implementation. See http://home.sch.bme.hu/~tusi/wfq/ I patched

Hello i''m having some issues trying to match packets using iptables mark, iproute filter and tc filter.- i mean, when i do iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 20 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -o eth1 --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 $TC qdisc del dev $INET_IFACE root $TC

Hello, I can''t force tc to work under SUSE 10.0 OSS. Before this we have working system under SUSE 9.1 (with kernel 2.6.15.4), and consider to move this system to another hardware. I install SUSE 10.0, first with kernel from distributive, than with kernel 2.6.16.18, than with 2.6.15.4 (the same version as on working system), but I can''t force tc to work. The

hai all i need to implement CBWFQ in linux As i wrote script in edge as: which mark the EF traffic ____________________________________________________________________-__ #!/bin/sh DEV=eth0 tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle 1: root dsmark indices 8 tc class change dev $DEV classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 # making two filters tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 tc

A few days ago I had a very big problem with tc. On the machine tc is used in many ways: - from crontab to load night-time and day-time bandwidth (at 1am and 8am) - from crontab to get statistics for qdiscs on WAN interfaces (every minute) - from perl/php database for changing user bandwidth (sometimes) What happened: At 1am the night-time bandwidth should be loaded. tc hanged up, and also

Hi, I wanted to implemente WFQ, but it is not implemented on tc. Is there any way of making something like WFQ with which is implemented on tc?? What I exactly want to do, is to select flows by IP and port destination, and priorize them, but I don''t need (and don''t really want) to fix any rate... Has anyone got any clue??? Thank you Bye

Hi all As part of may project i wants to implement the WFQ in linux, at present upto my knowledge there is no such implementation in linux. The only mannual i got from "Csaba Toth", He explained the tc command so i hope that is in linux also. DID any one know about it, Please infome me about it also, Thanks for all regards ********* *Sunil* *********

I would like to implement WFQ queuing discipline in Linux as a part of our deploma project. How to assign weight to each flow using ''tc'' commands.Then which will be the main queue. Thanks and Regards sheba

I am trying to build iproute2-2.4.7-20010824 from source on a 2.4.24 kernel. I have played a bit with ADDLIB and LDLIBS variables but I always get errors so I suppose it''s best if instead of playing I try to understand what does the following mean (from the README file): ADDLIB should contain inet_* functions, if your libc contains obsolete resolver library (<4.9.4) and you have no

How can we have WFQ implemented in Linux.....any pointers. Also do we need a patch in Kernel to implement these. Regards Arshad

i forget i''m using kernel 2.4.20 i''ve just compiled the new kernel 2.6.13 but i didn''t use it yet.- but it was compiled (the new kernel) with a lots of new support options to do lots of things with QoS and iptables upport etcetcetc regards again.- Guillermo from Argentina __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus

I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could only use what bandwidth was left. However, I''ve only just realized that tc is no longer accepting the commands I

Hi All I''m the newbie in iproute2. For some reason, I have to use static linked instead of dynamic. My kernel is 2.4.18-14 (Redhat 8.0). After patching htb3.6_tc.diff, still comes out "Unknown qdisc "htb"..." by "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20" command. Or any examples/web link discuss about iproute2 static linked? Please advise! BR

Gurus, I have a bunch of networks to route between, and I have read enough about iproute2 to know that is my best solution. Interfaces come up and go down, especially PPPnn from PPPoE clients, and I need to be able to modify routing tables, rules, and addresses in a dynamic fashion. I am hoping there is a tool-set other than the `ip` command and a bunch of bash scripts that I can manage

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Andy Furniss wrote: > The u8 test works OK for me as does the one below. My mistake. I cleaned the rules and removed the ones that collided with the u8 one. There is no error on this. (see explanation bellow). > > When playing with tc filters I always tc qdisc del dev eth0 root and enter > the whole lot again between tests. I always took that as mandatory.

> It seems that the official place to grab the source for iproute2 is > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ but there are only > sources for 2.2 and 2.6, where are the ones for 2.4? Well I got mine from http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/ but I didn''t even know about those 2.6 ones... I''m using the latest 2.4.7 with my 2.6.5

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).

Hello, I am trying to revive an old linux server installation, which still has libc5. Sadly, most current software does not compile anymore on this system, including the tc utility. As with other tools (net-tools, coreutils, procps etc.) I tried to compile and statically link (LDFLAGS=-static) on a more recent linux machine and copy the static binaries over to the old machine. But no luck

I would like to implement an architecture to support LLQ and WFQ with Qos linux elements ! Is possible use CBQ (you can set same parameters to control WRR process) or HTB (how can i controll DRR process) structure ? My idea is to classify packets by List flows, tos flows or connections flows (as CBWFQ on CISCO ) I saw also for WRR patch (http://www.zz9.dk/wrr), but I don''t understand

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?