similar to: tc del class not working

I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However, I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do: Eth1 -> HFSC ........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

hi, I would like to use the HFSC scheduler for my QoS. I''ve 4 class and 2 of them need to control the bandwidth and the latencies so I think I must use HFSC. So I read some doc ( http://del.icio.us/tag/hfsc ) but its not very clear. I make some tests with differents parameters but I''m not able to use correctly this scheduler: $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 40

I stumbled upon a problem while upgrading Ubuntu 13.04, Shorewall version from 4.4.26.1 to 4.5.16.1. Everything was working fine before, after upgrading the script wouldn''t start. First some config files. tcdevices: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWIDTH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED eth1 - 6300kbit hfsc,classify ifb0 - 6300kbit hfsc

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

Hi, Is it possible to attach another qdisq under a HFSC classfull ? I try it and the configuraton works : $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 30 $TC class add dev $dev parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate ${RATE}mbit ul rate ${RATE}mbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 200kbit $TC class add dev $dev

My problem with HFSC tc command is ... tc command''s HFSC have a lot parameter with 4 curve type SC curve -> umax dmax rate LS curve -> umax dmax rate RT curve -> umax dmax rate UL curve -> umax dmax rate so i''dont know which parameter are appropriate for my test case such real time class which curve are appropriate and good working result. my assumption about

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify fallback

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and  HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is In HTB tc command question 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about

I am investigating changing our broadband bandwidth control scripts over to HFSC. What I would like to accomplish is this: { * DOWNLOAD * I need a download class for each user (we''ll call it Class 1) that offers a minimum of lets say 384Kbps and a maximum of 1.5Mbps. The rates between 384Kbps and 1.5Mbps should be shared among all users. Each user should always be able to get at

Shorewall 4.5.21.4 is now available for download. Problems corrected since 4.5.21.3: 1) The Broadcast actions have been corrected: o --dst-type BROADCAST has been removed from the IPv6 version o A superfluous DROP rule in the IPv4 version has been suppressed. 2) Previously, if an HFSC class was specified with dmax but not umax, then the firewall would fail to start with the

Hello, I just found the great howto and started shaping my internet connection. The howto''s last update is a liitle in the past now so I have some questions about how things are done the best way nowadays ;-) To ensure a stable and low latency voip communication I added an HFSC qdisc to device ppp0 (1 Mbit SDSL). There are two classes (by now): One for SIP and RTP and one for the

Sorry for making this a cross-post, but the pressure is on for getting this bandwidth shaper working. I have an interesting dilemma with bi-directional packet classification while doing ACK prioritization. This is an overly simplified summary of my setup: Internet | Eth0 | Router | Eth1 | Intranet A client on the Intranet establishes a flow to a server on the Internet. Packets get

Hi all, Long email but please be patient :) I am part of EHAS [1], a non profit organization which main goal is to improve the Healthcare assistance in isolated rural areas in developing countries. Recently we have developed a long distance Wi-Fi network in Cuzco (Peru). This network provides connectivity to 12 nodes (they are in fact Health Centers). As VoIP is a essential service in this

hi all, long time since i posted on the list. just wondering if anybody has played around with hfsc and if so could he/she share their info on it thanks adrian -- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

1. HFSC have 4 curve such sc, rc, ls, ul and 1.1 In leaf class can specify rc for guarantee service (bandwidth and delay) and If want to sharing fairness exceess service, we must specify ls and ul curve too (ls curve with paramater m2 specify at lease sharing bandwidth in that class will receive and ul curve mean maximum bandwidth in that class will receive) so i''m doubt .. about if i

I upgraded one of my servers to CentOS 5.4 today. The freeradius service (radiusd) didn't start up due to permissions errors. I tracked it to the permissions on the /etc/raddb/certs/ directory being set to 640 rather than 750, so the radius user couldn't enter the directory. In the spec file from the source rpm, line 200 should read: %attr(750,root,radiusd) %config (noreplace)

Hi! Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps? There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such a field? tc -s class show dev eth0 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2