similar to: Is there a way....

Hi all, I am currently deploying tinc as an alternative to OpenVPN. My setup includes a lot of nodes and some of them are sitting together behind the same router on the same network segment. (E.g. connected to the same switch.) I noticed, that those nodes do never talk directly to each other via their private ip-addresses, but instead use the NATed address they got from the router.

Hi, this is my first post to the list. I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts. I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15 (Debian) that does NAT for 100 clients, and uses two different ISPs, using the howto found at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. I have *not*

Hi All; Did anyone try to use IAX IP Phone behind NAT, and let it receive calls from Asterisk without doing port mapping at the router existed at the site where the IAX IP Phone existed? Is the need just to let the IAX IP Phone that is NATed to register on the Asterisk and at asterisk I set nat=yes for the IAX client configuration? Or it is impossible to let the NATed IAX to receive calls

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --

I have a standard 3 interface shorewall setup and I want to receive multicast stuff from ''net'' -> ''loc''. This requires me, first, to do an IGMP join which involves 192.168.1.x -> 224.0.0.x being NATed out as the ''net'' interface''s IP address. Obviously replies have to be NATed back to ''loc'' addresses. Can

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at

Hi, We are testing a SIP solution * + ser solution for a large implementation. All the clients are nated. When a client is dialing outside the domain (to a FWD sip account for example) all is perfect ! ;-) But ,when a call is done to a sip account, the client is ringing, then the caller can hear the nated client very well, but the nated client does'nt hear anything. RTP issue no ? I've

I am using IAX soft clients (firefly, IAXComm, IAXPhone) from a Win2K machine on a NATed private LAN to connect to my IAXTel account. All of my calls to outside numbers(1-800, 1-877, etc) seem to be disconnected after 9 seconds. Has this limit been placed on IAXTel? My call to the echo test number at 1-700-999-9613 seemed to run for as long as I wanted. --

I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) provide dhcp and nfs services to an internal subnet via a dedicated switch. The other nic (eth0) connects to an external WAN switch to provide net access to the systems in the subnet. --- eth1 WAN switch eth0 --- | SUBNET switch --- eth2 Question: Is it

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

I have successfully implemented 1204 in semi production environment. Just want to share that it works very well, through the firewall (NATed). Unfortunately, it can not register with the server (and authenticate) but otherwise everything is fine. The audio quality is very good. Regards, Wojtek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Can anyone tell me whether I have a routing problem, or an openVPN problem, or something else? I''ve stared at this for so long I think I must be looking in the wrong place! I have 3 machines: Machine A has single ethernet card, eth0, 192.168.5.5 Machine B has eth0, 192.168.5.? on the local net, eth1, 81.2.x.y to the internet, and

Hi, my ISP is streaming some local concert using UDP multicasting. I followed the instructions on the site which described how to set VLC in order to view the stream, but it didn''t work. I am behind a Linux router/firewall doing NAT. Using google, I quickly found out that the netfilter/conntrack code doesn''t support NATing multicast traffic. I thought about bridging the internet

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

HI Michal Thank you for explaining. I have this situation in a number of production servers where we would always use static IPs for the host and VMs. In such case we have no requirement for NATed network in the future. And we we ever do, we can rely on a DHCP server within the LAN to provide IPs to the VMs. I'll look to remove both libivirt-daemon-driver-network,

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is

Hi I have a small lan (10.0.0.0/8) behind my linux box. I use MASQUERADE to allow users connects to internet. I set up an esfq qdisc for outgoing traffic. And there is a little question. Does source hash type in esfq recognize NATed local ip''s? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing

Has anybody tried to use Freenet's Germany based iPhone Service with Asterisk? Maybe even from behind a NAT? Freenet seems to use SER ... but I can not get a connection to their SIP proxy from Asterisk going through a NATed firewall. Asterisk <-SIP-> Firewall with NAT <-SIP-> Freenet iPhone server Thanks, Oliver

Hello everyone! I'm new to open-source in general and to LLVM in particular. I'd like to contribute and was thinking of starting from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5639 What the next step should be? Should I register somewhere? Thanks, Tami -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: