Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "icmp latency question"
2006 Feb 14
1
Guarantee ICMP respond time ?
Hello to all people there .
Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line .
i have typical NATed enviroiment like
External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24
i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i
attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example .
if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not
guarantted i mean
2007 Apr 26
1
HTB+SFQ
Hi folks,
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case.
Somebody can tell me the errors?
Thx, in advance.-
NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface.
SCRIPT que funciona:
2002 Aug 07
11
pb with ingress policy
Hi !
I have a single host which is connected via an 512kbit ADSL link to the n=
et. I quite often use some realaudio application that uses some bandwidth =
and I want to avoid other traffic to scale that bandwidth down. So I used =
some classes (with htb) on imq0 device and applied some filters and it see=
ms to work in most cases. However, there are some sites with which downloa=
d is
2004 Apr 04
2
IMQ & NAT
Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve
problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INET
|
|eth0 300Kbps
ROUTER (NAT)
|eth1
|
LAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MAX=300
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb
2004 Nov 19
2
HTB&IMQ
i''m trying to limit upload and download but something is wrong(it is about NAT)
i will post here my "script" maybe someone could tell me what is wrong
my kernel(2.6.9) is patch with imq(linuximq.net) and my iptables(1.2.11) also
#flush
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc del dev eth1 root
tc qdisc del dev imq0 root
tc qdisc del dev imq1 root
ifconfig imq0 down
2004 Jan 13
2
Bridge + leased line + tc
Hi,
I can''t get traffic shaping working.
This is my situation:
-------- ------
Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2
-------- leased line ------
eth1 eth0
We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation
between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation
2003 Apr 15
3
IMQ+HTB problem
Hi all and tc Gururs
i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering,
iam not able to see any traffic
and excusted the following the commands
modprobe imq numdevs=1
tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent
2005 Apr 20
5
A question.
I have a Smoothwall like firewall and proxy, I would like to establish
a bandwidth I inside specify for each IP my network. But that I have
been able to do it is to install the QoS to him but it is not
sufficient. Somebody can help me?
My English is very bad, pardon if this badly written, I had to use a translator.
2004 Jun 28
1
IMQ htb question
Hello,
I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the
imq usage example on the linuximq.net site:
It was something like this:
tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5
tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit
2007 Feb 27
2
Creating a contended section of bandwidth with HTB and IMQ
Hi All,
I''m trying to create a contended section of bandwidth using IMQ. I have the
imq0 device up and running, with traffic passing through it.
Firstly, I need to throttle the entire device imq0 to 2mbit/s.
I would then like to add throttle rules for individual IP addresses, allowing
them to pass up to 512kbit/s each, as long as imq0 has not reached its
2mbit/s.
The configuration
2002 Nov 12
1
pb with imq
hi stef
oone more pb while shaping incoming traffic with imq .this one
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: pfifo
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent
2004 Oct 28
12
HTB: Problem with excess bandwidth distribution
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want
to divide with tc.
When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give
it the appropriate unique mark:
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK
2005 Jan 24
3
Htb, imq and sfq traffic shaping
Hello,
I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0).
The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed
2006 May 11
9
HFSC and prioritization
I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However,
I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is
what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out
there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do:
Eth1 -> HFSC
........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536
2007 Sep 07
2
Prioritizing VOIP traffic without sacrificing throughput
Hi,
I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other
times not do traffic shaping at all.
Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In
order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds
much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP
reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download.
However,
2007 May 01
1
Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 26, Issue 25
Hey Andreas, how i catch this traffic using L7 filter?, i´ve installed l7
filter now, but i don´t kwnow to use the kind of filter...!!!
Can you help me?
Thx.-
Terraja-based
2007/4/29, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl>:
>
> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
2006 Feb 06
2
p2p marking, again
Hey, one more question for ipp2p
iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK
--restore-mark
iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7
iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark
iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK
2003 Mar 24
1
IMQ
Hello
I have a server with a dsl connection on eth1 and local interface eth0.
Because of the NAT i cannot direct traffic to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain
but have to use INPUT and FORWARD. So i use rules.
iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
And now the strange thing: FORWARD traffic gets directed nicely to the IMQ,
but
1999 Oct 07
2
Tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (2nd try)
Hi all together,
all answers to my first posting didn't help to solve my
problem.
Maybe this can help you.
When I'm doing: smbclient -L MYLINUX -U MYUSER
I get the following message:
Added interface ip=195.90.254.xxx broadcast=295.90.254.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: <enter password for myuser>
Domain=[MYDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.5a]
Tree connect failed: ERRSRV -
2004 Aug 15
1
Little question about imq device
Witam
I''ve found many examples where packets are redirected to IMQ device
in PREROUTING chain for ingress traffic shaping purposes.
But is there any sense in redirecting packets to IMQ in FORWARD
chain also for ingress traffic shaping purposes?
--
Pozdrawiam
Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl
_______________________________________________
LARTC