similar to: please ignore my last mail

Hi all! Anyone got the same problem? If I: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 4 set_tc_index it works fine. If I: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 4 it says: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I just don''t need that set_tc_index stuff for marking. Ferenc __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?

Hi all! In short: Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets? Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives, like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio? In long: I''m a hungarian univ student involved in a project (RMD-QoS stuff) which needs

Hello all, Please could someone help me with this, I have been trying for days to get this to work. I would like to have BE, AF & EF classes with HTB qdisc. I can''t find any scripts online where this has been done. If I enable this filter: #tc filter add dev eth0 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 \ #tcindex mask 0xf0 shift 4 pass_on then BE & AF classification seems to be fine but

i wrote a C++ program that executes "tc" using the std::system call. this fairly reduces the performance if many tc calls are required. i want to be able to rename tc''s main function to tc_main and pass argv and argc. has someone done something like this? please let me know how i can compile for netem. thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You

I tried to implement a multi-homed box using this faq 4.2.1 split access http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html But it says table is invalid. Can someone tell me what the difference is in Centos? I assume the FAQ is leaving out how to add tables to the iproute files? I am trying to have eth0 and eth1 service two different subnets for apache and not act as a

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. > When you snip the rest of my post man that last > request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I > saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and > thought I would

Hi all I''m new to Qos and iproute2, but studied well the documentation. According to http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html, catch all rule should be written as follows: tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 \ flowid 10:2 But it doesn''t work because filtertype is missing. Can somebody please kindly explain how to write a catch all rule? Many

Hi all, Aslak brought up a good point with regards to returning the pid for a popen4() method. As it stands now, it returns the pid of the shell rather than the pid of the process itself. However, my attempts to remove the COMSPEC stuff result in CreateProcess() failing with an error code of 2, i.e. "the system cannot find the file specified" - not too helpful. This is when I tried

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Hello, I searched the archives mailing list of LARTC. Everyone discussed about marking outbound ftp traffic . I could not find any thread discussed about marking inbound ftp traffic. With inbound ftp traffic , we don''t know the random ports specified by ftp servers in passive mode ? So marking inbound ftp traffic is impossible ? If it is possible, can you tell me, Thanks in

Is it possible to dynamically do bandwidh reservation? That is, I want to limit the traffic to 50% for upload and download, but if there aren''t onbound traffic, who is doing a download will get 100% of bandwidh and if there aren''t inbound traffic, who is doing a upload will get 100%, but if there are both inbound and outbount traffic, each one get limited to 50%. I think this

Hello! I''ve read a lot of mail archives, but can''t find solutions for my problem. I have router with about 700 users. I''m using HTB with SFQ leaf qdiscs for every user (client ip). So, different IP can have its own rate limit. This scheme ir working fine for a long time. But how can I limit number of connections (sessions) from one host? I see from ip_conntrack

Hello folks: I am trying to set up a router machine to handle all my network connections to the internet and my local network. I have five interfaces in total, three to ISPs (two adsl and one cable) and two interfaces to my local network one to a switch and one wireless card. I have some of the routing working acceptibly but another portion I cannot get working not matter what I''ve

Hi, could anyone provides any example about the use of ip route command to force the use of one route using masks in the mark? The configuration is: 1 LAN (zlan0) iface N WAN (wan0 ... wanN) ifaces with static IPs and load balanced. iptables 1.3.7 kernel 2.6.19.2 iproute 2.6.19 I''m yet setting marks into packets for QoS and its working, I now want to set some bits (OR)

Hi all, i am using iptables (1.2.8) + iproute on Slackware 8.0 (i386) working fine, marking packet based in destination port and network and selecting the appropriate route with this marks (i have two links, a 256Kb frame relay and a 512Kb ADSL). Now i change the machine for a Sun Enterprise 250 (Sparc64 with Debian 3.0r1) and iptables works fine (the packets are marked) but iproute

/-----------------------\ | | |eth0 |eth0 |-------| |-------| | |eth1 eth1 | | -------- A |____ _______| B |----- | | \ / | | --------| | | --------| | | | |

Has anyone set up any form of apache user isolation on CentOS? I have multiple virtual hosts on my machine, run by users who do not trust eachother. The problem is that any php script run by apache is able to do things like raw file io on other users' .htpasswds, php scripts, hidden directory listings, and so on. Database passwords can even be divulged in this way, since they are often stored

In regards to my earlier post, I believe that my problem is that the filter is not matching ssh traffic properly. Here are the rules that I posted earlier, with the filter being the last one: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 3 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 102400kbps ceil 102400kbps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 102400kbps ceil

Dear all, i have a query about the related subject. As per stated, i have created the filter rules using handle selector for packet shaping purpose of ssh , www, etc. its working nicely.Again i want to this rule to work as global for the two different network. If i was not wrong , i have created the rules as tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src