similar to: I dont want to shape a host

Hello all, I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is the scope: client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool) and open an interface into my linux box interface for this client is ppp0 client has got an ip 1.1.1.2/32 and it is poiting to pppoe-server 1.1.1.1 So,

Hello all, I am with a doubt about QoS solution... I have a 4 Mbit backbone coming from the telco I use... This is the link I serve to my clients, so I make this classes: $TC qdisc add dev $DL root handle 1: htb default 60 CLASS="/sbin/tc class add dev $DL parent" $CLASS 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4096Kbit $CLASS 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 256Kbit ceil 3072Kbit burst 15k $CLASS 1:1

I am using tbf to do bandwidth limitation. i found that when i start passing traffic there is a burst and then the rate goes down to what is configured. is this a known issue or do i need to change some parameters? thanks. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hello all, I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together. This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32: $TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:10 This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it to go to the same

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Hello, I''m trying to get lossless VoIP traffic over my 3000k/500k ADSL line. Shaping outgoing traffic is no problem: I set total ceil for outgiong device (ppp0) to 450kbit and put VoIP into highest prio class. Even during full upload the voice is clean on the other end. Now I tried to get the same result for incoming data. I attached HTB to eth1 where the incoming voip traffic is

Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Dear all, I''m now developing the qos mechanism on my mechine. I have read the documents of both the web site "HTB Home" and "lartc.org". But it confuses me that what is the accurate definition of the argument "rate"? It seems to be "the minimum rate which is guaranteed for a class" in the user guide of HTB Home, but in the manpage of lartc.org

Hello, I have been searching for HTB theory documentation and found two interesting sources - Devik''s page and docum.org FAQ. In some places they are contradictory which make me think that Devik''s theoretic document (marked "actual") is just too old and does not reflect the latest changes. After reading http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/30.html and others, I

Is there a flow diagram as to where tc actions take place with respect to NAT and other iptables functions on a multihomed box (private & public NICs) ? Are tc filter rules consulted before or after NATing? My real interest is in basic understanding first, and then solving a real problem second. Example: Firewall Public NIC 123.123.123.1 Firewall Private NIC 192.168.168.1 Dedicated Video

Actually i gave up, i tried and tried and tried so many times, upgrading software falling back to an old version but it didn''t work, that''s it. i can''t do work together tc with iptables and iproute2 when i mark a packet with iptables tc doesn''t recognize them so it falls at the default leaf of the tc''s tree what i like is to mark packets depending on

hi all. i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that "tc" code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on the pppX devices. I tested it and talking jargon, what should i do? The issue is that for each PPPoE login, PPPoE-server

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).

Hi, I''ve been migrating an existing htb-based traffic shaper from a hideous (I''m allowed to call it that - I wrote the damn atrocity myself) tc shell script into a TCNG configuration file, and after a few false starts I think I managed to get the syntax right. However, during tests it looks like some of the tiers aren''t passing their restrictions on to lower levels.

Hello everyone, We are working on HTB with TC and would like some clarifications from your part. Our example is as follows. We have one HTB root class and two HTB classes attached to it, as in this figure : 1: HTB | | |

in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket -> keep token for sending with rate second bucket -> keep ctoken for sending with ceil rate Is it true?? may be i''m misunderstand about token/bucket thoery _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Dear All! I reach the point that I must ask you what I have to do. I am beginner at traffic shaping and I''m very confused with it. :) Here''s my script that doesn''t do what I want to do with it: tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 2 r2q 10 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 300kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: