similar to: EF & AF filters with HTB

Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS parent as the dsmark it works, but when I add the htb as a parent of GRED and DSmark the parent of htb it does not work? Any

I ''ve been trynig for a long time now to make HTB and GRED to work togethen. The problem beeing that GRED doesn''t use handles (instead it uses DP:1 DP:2 etc) i can not preperly filter traffic to them. Tomas Graf suggested to use the tc_index index of u32 classifier so dear Sant .. i am currently with the following scripts that works! But when i try to add an HTB before the

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there any grapical interface for the QoS (Quality of Service) Traffic Control in Linux ? Greetings. - --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó carles@descom.es Descom Consulting Telf: +34 965861024 Fax: +34 965861024 http://www.descom.es/ - --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8

Hello, I have the following proplem. My DiffServ configuration is working fine when I do ping, but when I use mgen the packets are not detected at the core router. Here is my core router configuration: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 tcindex mask 0xfc shift 2 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent

Im using a Linux machine with standard pc hardware with 3 seperate PCI network interfaces to operate as a DiffServ core router using Linux traffic control. The machine is a P4 2.8ghz, 512mb RAM running fedora core 3 with the 2.6.12.3 kernel. All links and network interfaces are full duplex fast ethernet. IP forwarding is enabled in the kernel. All hosts on the network have their time sychronised

Im experimenting with using a Linux machine with 3 interfaces to operate as a core router. All links and network interfaces are 100mbit. Below is a ascii diagram of the network. (network A) edge router ------>core router---->edge router (network C) ^ | | edge router (network B) I have tried two

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the

Hi! I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field. I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about forwarding. Is it possible to farward packets from ingress to egress without sending them upwards in layers?

Hi, I am trying to implement a simple scaled-down version of the AF traffic class type. As such I basically want to remark non-conforming AF11 packets to AF13. Here is m script that I have been using on the ingress router of my network: ---------------------------------------- Link=''dev eth1'' Rate1=''rate 800Kbit'' Rate2=''rate 2500Kbit''

I want to set the DSCP field of the incoming packets. And then put them in the correct queues. I can mark the packets: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -d 10.10.10.12 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 dsmark indices 64 set_tc_index tc class change dev eth0 classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:1 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From:

All: I am tasked with creating an environment in which DiffServ and IP precedence is handled as close to RFC specification as possible. I have a few problems with implementing this based on current queueing structure. Here are a few of my questions. 1.) Is there any way to get DiffServ AF drop levels without using DSMARK and GRED? Ex. AF11 Gred DP 1 AF12 Gred DP 2 AF13 Gred DP 3 2.)

Hi all! In short: Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets? Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives, like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio? In long: I''m a hungarian univ student involved in a project (RMD-QoS stuff) which needs

Hello, its me again, I won''t stop sending emails to this list, until I solve this problem, I''ve tried several apps to create the right htb rules (even made them my self), but I always get the same results, traffic gets shaped, but I can''t use my bandwidth, and this is weird, because I should be able to, also I keep seeing download being limited too, and that

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

Is there anyway to actually see packet stats or that packets are for sure going into a prio queue with TC? I can see all the HTB stats but the prio classes just list as being there...would like more information Basically I have the following setup DSMARK | HTB - (tcindex filter on TOS) | Prio (u32 filter on TOS) Thanks Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

Hi all! Anyone got the same problem? If I: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 4 set_tc_index it works fine. If I: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 4 it says: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I just don''t need that set_tc_index stuff for marking. Ferenc __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?

Hi, I want to setup core routers to do both DSCP marking and to get the DSCP and forward packets based on DS field. I don''t want to separate DSCP marking to be done only at the edge routers. I know that dsmark is both used for DSCP marking and for getting the DSCP and forwarding packets according to DSCPs. In my case, since I want to do both of these I need two dsmarks.(?) I am not

Did anyone ever answer this one? THIS is what I am trying to do: >[LARTC] cbq+sfq and DSCP marking >Maria Joana Urbano stmaria@dei.uc.pt >Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:42 +0000 > > * Previous message: [LARTC] Monitoring.... > * Next message: [LARTC] two routes 1 network card > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] >