similar to: QoS Solution for an ISP - Need help on my build tryout

Hello all, As I have promised I am sending my QoS rules. This now works fine with u32 classifier (and parent 1:0 that I could not understand why it did not worked well before). Att, Nataniel Klug ------------------------ #!/bin/sh #------ # Script de QoS Cyber Nett #------ # Nataniel Klug # suporte@cnett.com.br #------ TC="/sbin/tc" IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hello all, After many time reading a lot of stuff I am quite confident using LARTC to route my trafic. I am still working on QoS (by package type and so on) but it will stay in my studing class for a long time... ;) So lets go to my question... I mounted a router that makes my conections throug 2 external interfaces. Its working fine and my default gateway for entire network behind

Hello all, I am with a doubt about QoS solution... I have a 4 Mbit backbone coming from the telco I use... This is the link I serve to my clients, so I make this classes: $TC qdisc add dev $DL root handle 1: htb default 60 CLASS="/sbin/tc class add dev $DL parent" $CLASS 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4096Kbit $CLASS 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 256Kbit ceil 3072Kbit burst 15k $CLASS 1:1

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Hello all, I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together. This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32: $TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:10 This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it to go to the same

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hello all, I am having some difficults to make a routing rule work. I want that every P2P packages go to one interface (eth2 - cheaper link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame relay very expensive). I am using this script to make the mark and balance: ------- #!/bin/bash IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables" IP="/sbin/ip" #---- # Declara redes #----

Hello, Here is what I want to do: I have a patch that make me able to mark package by its nature useing layer 7. So I use this line to mark a packge (i will use msnmessenger like example): $IPT -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto msnmessenger -j MARK --set-mark 3001 Now I want that all packges with this mark get throu my gateway using the link at eth2 and all other packges use

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hello all, I am trying to run a VB software using Wine but the software responds that it "ActiveX can't create objects". I have tryed many option that I know but no solution. This is the log file (using the command wine --bottle win98 --cx-app <name>): Code: ** Thu Apr 2 21:03:48 2009 Starting '/home/nata/cxoffice/bin/wineloader' 'winewrapper.exe'

Hello all, I need to put an IP alias to the same ethernet card, like this: eth0 - IP1/MASK1/BROADCAST1 eth0:1 - IP2/MASK2/BROADCAST2 In this box I will have another card that conects to a LAN netowork. I need this two alias in eth0 becouse I have two routes do take, but it seens to do not work. This is the script I am using (this scripts works fine when I have two ethernet cards

Hello all, I have a small ISP and I work all my clients networks over a routed network (now I am using 201.35.16.0/24 and 200.140.222.128/25 for my clients). The gateway server of the ISP is capable of running a web-cache (only http) using squid but I dont want that my clients go to the internet with the proxy/cache IP. Like when they enter in this site www.meuip.com.br it shows

Hello all, I am still reading about my QoS rules and I need that one of my servers (that is into my LAN but has an routing ip address) did not get into the qos rules I have. So I want that all traffic coming or going to that specifc host did not get shapped by any traffic control and do not get even into a QoS class. How can I do this? Att, Nataniel Klug

Hello, I am looking for an answer. I am doind some thing like a loadshare betwen two backbones. To one of them I send all p2p, msn and irc packages and to the other one I send the rest I have. The problem I am facing is about prio at tables: ip rule add fwmark 1 table 201 prio 202 This is the rule I make. This is, I thinbk, working fine. The default gateway is set into table

Hi, w.r.t. http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/326 I'd like to try out some of the patches mentioned against my xapian svn trunk to see what kind of improvement can be realised. There are quite a few patches, so can I simply try them all top-to-bottom, or which of them are recommended (ie, I don't want to screw with the index format)? Thanks h

Hello all, I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is the scope: client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool) and open an interface into my linux box interface for this client is ppp0 client has got an ip 1.1.1.2/32 and it is poiting to pppoe-server 1.1.1.1 So,

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Hello, I am trying to make a load balance at my box using two conections. I have compile my kernel with this patch routes-2.6.13-12.diff (tha I get from this website: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#routes). The problem is that when I try to balance using weight sintaxe (i will put the script bellow) some conectios just drop. So I can enter some pages but other I could not...

Hello all, I have this situation: eth0 - internet backbone eth1 - network 192.168.0.0/24 (clients) eth2 - network 192.168.1.0/24 (clients) My problem is that this two networks, one into each interface, need to share 256 Kbps. I could not make a way to shape this both networks becouse they are in different interfaces. Anyone knows some way to make it happen? Att, Nataniel Klug