similar to: broadcast forwarding

Hello, I remember there was some package to forward broadcast packets so that LAN games like counter-strike could be seen on different subnets without specifying the IP, but I lost my bookmarks. Remeber it was ot freshmeat, but I can''t find it. Anyone knows its name or is there any other way to do it ? It looks like this: CS Server 192.168.0.x <-> Linux gateway (without NAT)

Hi folks, Has anyone out there done port forwarding or DNAT for UDP packets that are normally sent to the broadcast address (255.255.255.255)? I have to support a nasty database application called FileMaker Pro (those of you who know it are probably groaning about now), which uses broadcasts to locate the database server. Theoretically, i can get around this requirement by using LDAP lookups

I''m looking to refine / re-use my recently discussed "Redundant internet connections" (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2007q2/thread.html#21015) in such a way that I will not be sure of returning traffic, thus I must monitor the connection my self and not rely on inbound traffic to update the kernel counters. I''m considering using arping to ping the

Hi. -j IMQ is equal -j ACCEPT...? i mean it after -j IMQ packet don''t return in parent chain??? cause -j ACCEPT action accept the packet in the child chain and don''t return it to parent... example: ipt="iptables -t mangle" $ipt -N HTTP $ipt -A HTTP -j IMQ // after this packet packets go to -t nat tables? or // it return to parent chain (PREROUTING) in mangle?

Hello All, I recently upgraded to Redhat AS3 from an older 7.3 installation. With samba 3 (3.0.2-6.3E is the rpm version), I've been seeing activity that wasn't present before. Every 15 minutes (within a few seconds accuracy), I receive an alert from our SonicWall (firewall appliance) reporting that a "Malformed IP packet dropped." where the source was the upgraded server, and

Hello, I connected the network 192.168.1.0 with 192.168.2.0 over the internet trough a GRE-Tunnel. I don''t know if I set up all things right: The client-pcs in both networks have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.2.x''s default gateway is the server wich has started the tunnel. The 192.168.1.x''s default gateway is 192.168.1.250 wich routes traffic destinated to

Thank you and sorry...There is something going wrong with the system I only sent one mail... _____ From: Kerry Garrison [mailto:kerryg@techdatapros.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 5:14 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [SPAM] - RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream-Budge tone - Email found in subject This is usualy a problem with either

Hi , I am new to R. I am trying to run a simple R script as shown below: aov.R ------ data1<-c(49,47,46,47,48,47,41,46,43,47,46,45,48,46,47,45,49,44,44,45,42,45,45,40 ,49,46,47,45,49,45,41,43,44,46,45,40,45,43,44,45,48,46,40,45,40,45,47,40) matrix(data1, ncol= 4, dimnames = list(paste("subj", 1:12), c("Shape1.Color1", "Shape2.Color1", "Shape1.Color2",

Hi everyone I have a rather tricky question. We use skip 1.1.1 between our Suns to sign the IP trafic. A side effect of that is that the Suns can't see each other's broadcast. Now I want to set up two samba servers, with and without encrypted passwords. They must recognice each other, since one of the severs also is a domain master and they should both be annonunced in a different subnet.

Hi to all. I have an unusual problem on a Linux box: sometimes the box is invisible to the Windows clients, I have to restart the service to restore proper operations. I think to have traced down the problem. During bootstrap, eventually Samba initialize itself when the iptables firewall is not yet completely initialized. During a little time the firewall is rejecting broadcast requests. I

I am extremely puzzled by this behavior in R. I have a data frame called Trials in which I have results from an experiment. I am trying to do a subjects analysis, but getting weird results. Each row has 1 trial in it, which includes a column for the subject number I get the list of subject numbers like so: > Subj=unique(sort(Trials$Subj)) Then I loop over them. But I get strange results. As

Dear all, In lme, models in which a factor is fully "contained" in another lead to an error. This is not the case when using lm/aov. I understand that these factors are aliased, but believe that such models make sense when the factors are fitted sequentially. For example, I sometimes fit a factor first as linear term (continuous variable with discrete levels, e.g. 1,2,4,6), and

When I try to start up zaptel, whilst running ztcfg, I get the following error: Jan 1 10:48:18 bu ztcfg: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: No such device or address (6) My /etc/zaptel.conf is: fxsks=1 fxoks=2 loadzone = au defaultzone=au Channel 1 is a X101P card connected to the PSTN and channel 2 is a S100U box driving an analogue phone. The zaptel kernel module gets loaded OK as does the

All, How does one extract the level-1 variance from a model fit via lmer()? In the code below the level-2 variance component may be obtained via subscripting, but what about the level-1 variance, viz., the 3.215072 term? (actually this term squared) Didn't see anything in the archives on this. Cheers, David > fm <- lmer( dv ~ time.num*drug + (1 | Patient.new), data=dat.new )

Dear R-help, I'm facing a problem with defining a repeated measures anova with weighted data. Here's the code to reproduce the problem: # generate some data seed=11 rtrep <- data.frame(rt=rnorm(100),ti=rep(1:5,20),subj=gl (20,5,100),we=runif(100)) # model with within factor for subjects/repeated measurements, no problem aov(rt~ti + Error(subj/ti),data=rtrep) #model with weights

All, I'm trying to plot an all.effects() object, as shown in the help for all.effects and also Crawley's R book (p.178, 2007). The data has a repeated measures structure, but I'm using all.effects for the simple lm() fit here. Below is a reproducible example that yields the error message. fm.ex = lm(dv ~ time.num*drug*X, data = dat.new) fm.effects = all.effects(fm.ex, xlevels =

Hi all, I have a strange problem and rigth now I can't figure out a solution. Trying to calculate an ANOVA with one between subject factor (group) and one within (hemisphere). My dependent variable is source localization (data). My N = 25. My data.frame looks like this: > ML.dist.stack subj group hemisphere data 1 1 tin left 0.7460840 2 2 tin left

Hi All, I am using samba Version 3.5.4 on AIX 6.1. The installation is through pware binary ( pware53.samba.rte 3.5.4.0). There seems to be a strange issue with NetBios where it terminates with the following error logged just after starting. The diagnosis fails in step 4 of Samba Diagnosis test ("nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA_") because no netbios (nmbd) is running. snippet from

Hello, I am having a problem where code that plots lines using a different data frame plots bars with the current data frame (I am intended to plot lines). The code specifies lines (see below), so I can't figure out why the results are bars. I suspect that it may have something to do with the fact that in the data frame where the code worked as intended, the both variables specifying

I am trying to read and write database tables that have a date field in them. I am constructing a data.frame, then using dbWriteTable to create the table and dbReadTable to read it. >datatbl<-data.frame( dates, trialnum, fooddel, ethdel, trialtime, trialtype, deliveries, food, ethanol, fcumrec, dcumrec, rrf, rrd) >ifelse(startdate==filelist,