similar to: tc is giving an error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

here''s the output : # tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit cell 8b (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit/8 weight 10Mbit allot 1514b level 2 ewma 5 avpkt 1000b maxidle 23us Sent 294 bytes 7 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0 class cbq 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: rate 100Kbit cell 8b prio 1/1 weight 100Kbit allot 1600b

Hi All, I''m using iptables-1.2.7a on RedHat8 kernel 2.4.20. I wanted to limit the file-sharing traffic to the internet. I marked the packets with iptables: iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1024:1862 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1864:65535 -j MARK --set-mark 1

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A

Hi all, I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks a little like this: ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Raw qdiscs on each bridge port tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth

Hi,All I am using iproute2 to manage bandwith for ADSL router.High,medium,low priority are needed for different protocol port on the ADSL's upstream side,as following: LAN --- |ADSL Router|------WAN When there aren't traffic on the specific priority, its bandwidth should be borrowed by other priorities.But it doesn't work.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot

Hi all. I fear I''m slightly offtopic with this question, but I''ll keep it short: who is (or feels) responsible for the #lartc irc-channel in oftc.net? I''d appreciate if that person would get in contact with me (off-list) in order to discuss some ideas I have. Thanks in advance. Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hey all, I had asked a question a little while ago about CPU usage being outrageous while using tc and a cbq qdisc. Ed was very kind and offered a few suggestions. One of these was to look at hashing. So after pounding away at it for about a week, I have a general understanding of how it works and have tried to implement it. Unfortunately, and quite obviously since I''m posting here, it

OK, finally I have made cbq run ! now I would like to know if it is posible to limit a range of IP to a speed. something like this : from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.21 limit to 128K I don''t whant to limit each IP to 128K, what I would like to do is limit all 20 IP to have a max of 128K. Is it posible?

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

I am using a server with asterisk and I am trying to prioritize voip traffick -- I am a newbie at this traffic shaping, so please bear with me. I used the script below and what happens is thatall traffic in the bulk class stops after a couple of minutes. Also, should I include the ports for rtp in the filter statements with the ports 5061 and 4569? Note I have a fairly big pipe -- supposed to

Hi All, I found 2 unusual behavior with u32 classifier in Kernel 2.4.12. I’ve u32 compiled as module. 1> u32 filter seems not working if there is already some fw filter used for some other class. In order to get u32 working I’ve to delete root class, which in terms delete all fw filters too, and then same command for u32 works. fw is also compiled as module. 2> If I add u32 filter to my

Dear members I''m new to this list and also new to tc command. I have a subnet with over 30 pc which have ip addresses from 172.16.1.1/16 range.I want that each computer in my subnet can work with internet with maximum 6k for download and maximum 6k for upload.when i run the following tc commands from my bridge the first pc works well but the second pc can not work with 6k and it has an

hi all, Iam using the following CBQs to limit the FTP bandwidth pease tell what changes are rquired to make it work.... tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq allot 1514 avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq allot 1514 bandwidth 100Mbit rate .4Mbit weight .4 prio 2 maxburst 20 cell 8 avpkt 1000 tc class add dev eth0

Hello, I have been working on tc class . But when the classid reaches 5 digit , it DOES NOT ACCEPT THAT ... see the example below :: tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:36 classid 10:13310 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate 32Kbit allot 1514 weight 3.2Kbit prio 5 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 bounded See the bold digit !! this command doesn''t work , but if i use with 4 digit then it works : tc class

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Good afternoon, I am a newbie to lartc. I have read the HOWTO. I set up a CBQ traffic control using the following commands, and it caused my VNC connection to break frequently. ======================================================================= **CBQ: cbq-1280.My_shaper /sbin/tc qdisc del dev lo root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1 cbq bandwidth 20Mbps avpkt 1000 cell 8 /sbin/tc