similar to: trying to prioritize voip traffick

Hello all, I''ve got a couple redundant (Spanning Tree Protocol) boxes running FC1 minimal install + bridge-utils and they are working great for QoS + ntop monitoring. I''m wondering if I should handle the VoIP traffic a little differently. I don''t mind letting VoIP and Video lend out traffic when it isn''t being used, so that''s why I gave them such

Could someone give me some help in prioritizing uploading traffic on my ADSL connection. Currently, I have set up a Linux 2.4.12 router/firewall/NAT to allow our network of users to access the Internet. --------- eth0 ---- Linux router/firewall/NAT --- eth1 ---- Local network a.b.c.d 192.168.1.254 I can''t seem to find enough information

Hi,All I am using iproute2 to manage bandwith for ADSL router.High,medium,low priority are needed for different protocol port on the ADSL's upstream side,as following: LAN --- |ADSL Router|------WAN When there aren't traffic on the specific priority, its bandwidth should be borrowed by other priorities.But it doesn't work.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot

Hi all, I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks a little like this: ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Raw qdiscs on each bridge port tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

hey guys i am regulating the traffic to & fro by my network through a linux gateway , its behaving strange. i regulated Downlink to 2Mbps & UPlLINK to 500Kbps. both perform well when those are done independent i.e. one at a time but when i do both from a client system ..the downlink however continues at 2mbps but the uplink falls down to 100kbps? is something wrong with my script or

Hi All, I found 2 unusual behavior with u32 classifier in Kernel 2.4.12. I’ve u32 compiled as module. 1> u32 filter seems not working if there is already some fw filter used for some other class. In order to get u32 working I’ve to delete root class, which in terms delete all fw filters too, and then same command for u32 works. fw is also compiled as module. 2> If I add u32 filter to my

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :

I need to shape traffic from some IP on one LAN, but I''m in trouble. There is a linux 2.4.26 connected to the Internet (eth0) / LAN(eth1) doing NAT. I''m using VLANs in the LAN Interface, that is connected to a 3Com SuperStack II in a 802.1Q tagged port. I want to create a class that will limit the traffic at 384Kbit/s. I want to create two leaf classes that limit the traffic at

Hello! I have a problem here. I set up a Linux 2.4 machine to do bandwidth limiting for some of our customers. Current setup is something like this: |--------| backbone |-------| |---------| |Internet|225.1-----------225.10|limiter|228.1----228.10|cust. gw2| |--------| | eth0 |-------| eth1 |---------| | 225.20

Hi all. I fear I''m slightly offtopic with this question, but I''ll keep it short: who is (or feels) responsible for the #lartc irc-channel in oftc.net? I''d appreciate if that person would get in contact with me (off-list) in order to discuss some ideas I have. Thanks in advance. Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hey all, I had asked a question a little while ago about CPU usage being outrageous while using tc and a cbq qdisc. Ed was very kind and offered a few suggestions. One of these was to look at hashing. So after pounding away at it for about a week, I have a general understanding of how it works and have tried to implement it. Unfortunately, and quite obviously since I''m posting here, it

hi all, Iam using the following CBQs to limit the FTP bandwidth pease tell what changes are rquired to make it work.... tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq allot 1514 avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq allot 1514 bandwidth 100Mbit rate .4Mbit weight .4 prio 2 maxburst 20 cell 8 avpkt 1000 tc class add dev eth0

Hello, I have been working on tc class . But when the classid reaches 5 digit , it DOES NOT ACCEPT THAT ... see the example below :: tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:36 classid 10:13310 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate 32Kbit allot 1514 weight 3.2Kbit prio 5 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 bounded See the bold digit !! this command doesn''t work , but if i use with 4 digit then it works : tc class

Dear members I''m new to this list and also new to tc command. I have a subnet with over 30 pc which have ip addresses from 172.16.1.1/16 range.I want that each computer in my subnet can work with internet with maximum 6k for download and maximum 6k for upload.when i run the following tc commands from my bridge the first pc works well but the second pc can not work with 6k and it has an

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Hi! I just recently entered the wonderful world of the so called "advanced routing" and decided to try and limit the bandwidth of a MASQed network here and ended up in trouble :(. The setup is (as far as I can tell) pretty straightforward. eth0 is connected to the "real" network with a proper IP, and eth2 is 192.168.10.x (the MASQed network). All of it is basicly right out of

all: I"m just trying to create a simple rsvp session to familiarize myself with the protocol. I don''t ever get a rsvp RESV message only PATH AND PATH TEAR messages. There is a timeout but i''m not sure whats causing it exactly. Can anyone shed some light on why? All the configs and output are below. Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks. Jon Test

Have a few generic questions about Kom-RSVP 1.) 11:00:05.175 WARNING: timer system overloaded, deviation is 30.080 sec - what timer is this referring to? System time? 2.) What is the relationship between the CBQ class created for RSVP traffic and the CBQ parameter that is in RSVP.conf? - ex. ### cbq qdisc ### tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq bandwidth 10mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64