similar to: questions about HFSC, VoIP and (dynamic) ingress shaping

G''Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to work, though, do I have to account for the ATM overhead in the small VOIP packets by defining my

I am investigating changing our broadband bandwidth control scripts over to HFSC. What I would like to accomplish is this: { * DOWNLOAD * I need a download class for each user (we''ll call it Class 1) that offers a minimum of lets say 384Kbps and a maximum of 1.5Mbps. The rates between 384Kbps and 1.5Mbps should be shared among all users. Each user should always be able to get at

Hello, I''m trying to get lossless VoIP traffic over my 3000k/500k ADSL line. Shaping outgoing traffic is no problem: I set total ceil for outgiong device (ppp0) to 450kbit and put VoIP into highest prio class. Even during full upload the voice is clean on the other end. Now I tried to get the same result for incoming data. I attached HTB to eth1 where the incoming voip traffic is

Hi! Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps? There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such a field? tc -s class show dev eth0 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2

Hi, After reading section 9 of LARTC it seemed to me that a pure TOS based QoS setup with be sufficient for a small newtork. Interactive packets could have the highest priority, second highest for DNS and small HTTP packets and lowest prio for all others. The advantage is that, the setup would be simply a couple of iptables lines, because the default pfifo_fast qdisc already implements

My problem with HFSC tc command is ... tc command''s HFSC have a lot parameter with 4 curve type SC curve -> umax dmax rate LS curve -> umax dmax rate RT curve -> umax dmax rate UL curve -> umax dmax rate so i''dont know which parameter are appropriate for my test case such real time class which curve are appropriate and good working result. my assumption about

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

hi all, long time since i posted on the list. just wondering if anybody has played around with hfsc and if so could he/she share their info on it thanks adrian -- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and  HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is In HTB tc command question 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about

Hello I have few questions regarding tc functionality (qdiscs, classes, etc.) when vlans are in use. For example, consider interface eth0, for which I create and extra vlan with vconfig, let''s say eth0.11. Then using tc I can add usual things - qdiscs, filters, ... - to both eth0 and eth0.11. The questions are: - on which interface - virtual or real, should I actually use tc ? Or

Dear Community, sorry for the somewhat dumb question. Maybe someone has any pointer to how to setup the RED queue to mark pakets with ECN. In particular what are appropriate parameter settings for limit, min, max, etc. All my trials end up with either "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", although the command line (at least for me) looks fine in regard to what is said on the

after i use "tc -s -d class ls dev eth0" will show statistic data about HFSC ,like this root@ubuntu:/home/shaper# tc -s -d class ls dev eth2 class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) period 24 work 13844792199226589188 bytes rtwork 20937281664 bytes level 3461036864 class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 30720Kbit d 10.0ms m2 30000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2

Hello, I''m using Linux kernel 2.6.x and tc (from iproute2 package). I''m trying to use HTB or HFSC scheduler in order to limite the rate of outgoing packets and also in order to minimiez delay for RTP stream. But I didn''t suceed in having this 2 QoS services working. I use Iptables in order to classify packets. Here is my HFSC conf. In fact the pings that i send from

When I start my script: * - Creating classes on br1 for upload control ... * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:0 classid 2:46 hfsc ls m1 576.0Kbit d 2000ms m2 192.0Kbit ul m2 384Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:47 hfsc sc umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 80Kbit . [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:48 hfsc ls m2 152.0Kbit ul m2 152.0Kbit

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

I stumbled upon a problem while upgrading Ubuntu 13.04, Shorewall version from 4.4.26.1 to 4.5.16.1. Everything was working fine before, after upgrading the script wouldn''t start. First some config files. tcdevices: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWIDTH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED eth1 - 6300kbit hfsc,classify ifb0 - 6300kbit hfsc

I try use setup traffic shaping with Shorewall-4.0.2 and have fault. When i start Shorewall with tc-files configured i get follow messages: ... RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory We have an error talking to the kernel ERROR: Command "tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 500kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1" Failed

Hi ! I wanted to shape my analog modem connection so I took these two lines from the ''wondershaper'' script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress #tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip \ src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK} burst 10k drop flowid :1 with DEV=ppp0 and DOWNLINK=24kbit. But, when I activate it, nothing comes back from the