similar to: no PROMISC mode in ip link show

I have two IP for eth0 which correspond to eth0 and eth0:1 I want to create a route to 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.0.50 from eth0:1 so I add the route with ip route add 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.1.2 dev eth0:1 but when I connect to 192.168.66.0/24 network in connects still using the IP of eth0, not the IP of eth0:1 as one would expect. What''s strange to me is that ip route list

This is really strange behavior .. root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testing123 mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123: ip/ip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 ttl inherit root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testingabc mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# echo $? 0 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123:

This comse from iproute-ss050901, rebuilt on FC4 with -fortify-source option. Seems like ip has a buffer overflow which sometimes causes a segfault.. will try to look at it tmrw, so far here''s my gdb output. $ gdb ip GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome

tc.c has the following line snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/usr/lib/tc/q_%s.so", str); the libdir should not be hardcoded but it should be detected at build time. Radek -- Radek Vokál <rvokal@redhat.com> Base OS Engineering Office: +420 543 422 235 Red Hat Inc. http://www.redhat.com

I''m seeing strange output with iproute 2.6.18 and 2.6.19 with ip route get. Instead of (null) I would expect to see sth like mtu. Does anyone have good explanation for it? $ ip route get 123.45.67.1 123.45.67.1 via 10.32.0.254 dev eth0 src 10.32.0.193 cache (null) 1500 ssthresh 1460 advmss 64 -- Radek Vokál <rvokal@redhat.com> Base OS Engineering - Team Lead Office:

There''s a flag 10000 that is not recognized by iproute. The kernel uses #define IFF_LOWER_UP 0x10000 /* driver signals L1 up */ #define IFF_DORMANT 0x20000 /* driver signals dormant */ -- Radek Vokál <rvokal@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, this appeared on Red Hat bugzilla and I''m not sure if customer presumption is correct `ip -6 route add 10::a120/124 via 10::a111` returns RTNETLINK answers : invalid argument His expected result is that route table to subnet 10::a120/124 should be added <snip> I know RFC3587 described prefix 001b is the unicast global address range assigned by IANA, and all other unicast

This is an example rule from sample.rules r ^[^/] /tftpboot/\0 # Convert non-absolute files but it seems to be broken in tftpd-0.40. This comes from syslog when accesing sample file on server. Dec 22 14:11:35 localhost in.tftpd[10443]: r rules cannot be inverted, line 1: ^[^/] /tftpboot/\0 # Convert non-absolute files this was already present in 0.39 version and according

Start tftp with no host name Enter a host name When looking at the tftp> prompt press ^C $ tftp (to) localhost tftp> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x08b8b9c0 *** Aborted I've attached a patch fixing this issue but I'm not convinced this is the right way to do it. Radek -- Radek Vok?l <rvokal at redhat.com> -------------- next part

Hi, I''m not convinced I''m facing a bug, I was reading some code and also reading some threads and finally reached this conclusion, please let me know if it''s not clear enough and also if you don''t agree : - The case it shows the flag with iproute is because it''s using a single flag set. That was working on kernels linux <2.1.x. (2.0 etc.)

Hi, What happened to the rhel3 i386 arpwatch package? There is only a x86_64 version: sarastro:/users/henkvl 573% ls /users/mirror/Linux/centos/3/*/*/RPMS/arp* /users/mirror/Linux/centos/3/addons/x86_64/RPMS/arpwatch-2.1a11-7.E3.5.x86_64.rpm but there once was a i386 version, as a have a /var/cache/yum/addons/headers/arpwatch-14-2.1a11-7.E3.5.i386.hdr Cheers, -- Henk van Lingen, Systems

I experimented with rails --svn option. I use following commands 1 $ su root "mkdir -p /var/lib/svn/projekt; chown radek:radek /var/lib/svn/projekt" 2 Password:heslo roota 3 $ svnadmin create /var/lib/svn/projekt 4 $ mkdir -p /tmp/projekt/trunk 5 $ svn import -m "Creating empty project projekt" /tmp/projekt file:///var/lib/svn/projekt 6 //var/lib/svn/pokus 7

Hello everyone, I need a little help finding an issue one of my machines. I have 4 setup all the same way and just this one gives the errors. Here are the errors from Logwatch; ?################### LogWatch 5.2.2 (06/23/04) #################### ?--------------------- Arpwatch Begin ------------------------ Argument "4444'service' option expects either the name of a

Hi Radek, Sorry for the delayed response. I haven't had time to check your analysis yet, but you're probably right: MCJIT's support for multiple modules in a single instance is patchy at best. Do you have a test case (e.g. an lli invocation) that triggers this bug, or is this something you discovered just by reading the code? Cheers, Lang. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, David

Hello, can anyone help me. After a few weeks I returned to the rails to play with it. But I recognize that I''m now not abble to build appdoc. The same thing that few weeks ago worked without an problem now give me an error: unrecognized option `--line-numbers --inline-source'' $ rake --trace --verbose reappdoc (in /home/radek/src/firma/giga-net/ncc/work) ** Invoke reappdoc

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello, on my old system I''m using ipchains. Can anyone help me with converting rule /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s source_addr -d destination_addr 443 -p tcp to shorewall. I know that I can write eth0 source_addr to /etc/shorewall/masq file but I can''t found where I can specify the destination address. The reason for this is to allow one user (computer) access only to

Hey there guys. I have successful postfix + mysql + sagator + clamav + spamassassin + dovecot setup (it was a really crazy month full of tweaking :]) and the only thing i miss is some per maildir specific filtering. i decided to use sieve. everything is fine except that dovecot's deliver process doesn't see the actual .dovecot.sieve file with filtering rules in the root of a maildir.

> ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:38:14 +0200 > From: Bazy <bazy at goofy.celuloza.ro> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] tftp-server > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <472DF576.2030601 at goofy.celuloza.ro> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Radek Bursztynowski wrote:

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a etch xen server with a virtual machine with 2 network > interfaces configured. Every interface has a different mac, and inside > the host has a different ip. > > However I can see with tcpdump and arpwatch (I discover this because > arpwatch told me), about the two ips