similar to: I need help with tc filters!!!!!

Hi to everybody I''m trying to use PRIO qdisc to prioritize the traffic but i have strange problem maybe I''m missing sometging. First i add root qdisc like this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio it''s fine after this i try to match traffic by tos field but i get error invalid match tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip tos 0x10 0xff

Hi, I am currently working on the TC. I have seen some behaviour which seems to be odd. I know someone in the mailing list would have seen this problem or may have some fix for this problem. When I try to include u32 filters with different priority or pref, I could see the filters being set on all the priority''s irrespective of the priority number. See my sample script below and the

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure

Hi All, About u32 usage, as I know the following 3 syntax should be the same: 1. tc filter add ........u32\ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff 2. tc filter add ........u32\ match 00060000 00ff0000 at 9 3. tc filter add ..........u32\ match u8 6 0xff at 10 However, in my platform (Linux2.4.2), only method 1 works. Besides, as I show the filter (tc filter ls dev eth1), it gives me "

Hi How can I control which filter a packet will meet first? I have tried changing the order of applying the tc filter scripts and switching flowid number, but ''protocol ip u32 match ip src <ip net> match ip src 0.0.0.0/0'' always kicks in first? >From my script -------------------- # All traffic - Priority: Low tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32

I''m having trouble getting ingress policing to work on a bridged device. The bridge contains several interfaces: peth0, vif0.0, vif[1-7]0.1, vif[25].1 . (This is under xen, in case the vif''s didn''t give that away, so peth0 is renamed eth0.) The tc rules I have are: tc qdisc del dev peth0 root tc qdisc del dev peth0 ingress handle ffff: tc qdisc add dev peth0 root

Greetings, I am working in a project , and we are concerned about usin Traffic Conrol tool in iproute2 package, but unfortunately we are facing some problems using u32 filters to match the ip protocol. Frankly we used: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip pref 2 u32 match ip protocol 1 0xff classid 1:4 ( to match icmp protocol ) and then we tried to use # tc filter add dev

Hi, I am currently using TC for setting up user MAC based filters,and I am seeing a problem when I try to assign different priorities to the MAC Match filter apart from the root qdisc and parent class. Here is my script. /*****************************************************/ First of all I create the qdisc and class based on priority 2 and also the Hash mask tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle

Hello, I've rented a dedicated root server (SR7 at strato.de) and would like to run qemu at it, but get the error: # qemu -hda install.img -cdrom install47.iso -boot d Could not initialize SDL - exiting It seems that I have to establish X connection, so I've installed Xming at my WinXP laptop and at the server I have changed these 3 lines in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config: X11Forwarding

As soon as the application starts, a window pops up that (normally under windows) would say "this is a trial version demo, click okay to start the trial", or something along those lines. The window is blank and clicking randomly on it (to find the "ok") does not work either. The following output from wine during this test is as follows : err:iphlpapi:getRouteTable Received

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit

Hi there good people, I''m a newbie in what concerns running Linux on machines other than desktops, so I need help from all you gurus out there :-) I have Linux installed on an old computer (Winchip C6, Pentium clone), acting as a router/firewall for two other computers. Both these machines are connected to the firewall via a dedicated ethernet card each, on different subnets,

Hi, I''m trying to police ingress traffic based on port numbers and IP addresses. The u32 match based on IP addresses seems to work without issues and I''m am able to police incoming packets. However, the same isn''t working with u32 matches based on TCP port numbers. For port numbers, I added exactly one ''u32 match'' rule: common for both: # tc qdisc add

Hi everybody! I`m working in a QoS framework for wireless network and I want to know if somebody knows some Admission Control program for bandwidth that runs in Linux. Thanks a lot! regards Luciana _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc