similar to: Concerning IP over ATM & IP over Ethernet.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Brenda So via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question concerning block address class in LLVM. I am currently > working on a project where I need to obtain and manipulate basic block virtual > addresses. I was searching the web and found the llvm::BlockAddress class ( > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BlockAddress.html). With

Hi all, I have a question concerning block address class in LLVM. I am currently working on a project where I need to obtain and manipulate basic block virtual addresses. I was searching the web and found the llvm::BlockAddress class (http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BlockAddress.html). With this class I was able to obtain a printout like this: i8* blockaddress(@func_name, %bb_label) How do

I have read the thread at http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q1/018287.html and still don''t know how to fix this problem. It appears alot of work has gone into it but the HOWTO is so out of date it doesn''t even begin to addresses this method. So here are my questions 1. what is the current state of these patches? are they in a specific version? do i have to patch myself?

The bitcode is only a representation of the IR, which is in SSA form. And SSA form assumes an infinite amount of registers, which is not offered by x86. When bitcode gets assembled/compiled to machine language, it breaks down the SSA form into non-SSA format. Personally I don't know how to use bitcode language to achieve what you want to do. The closest thing I can think of is the llvm-MC

Program counter - EIP, RIP for x86/64. I need to obtain it and pass it as an argument to the function that calculates an ordinal from it. I think that there must be some way to use the bitcode language to place byte values at a designated offset. Or use the command line to specify the section and offset for the data. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Brenda So <sogun3 at gmail.com> wrote:

If you can write what you want to output in C with asm statements, clang can show you what the IR should look like. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Program counter - EIP, RIP for x86/64. I need to obtain it and pass it as > an argument to the function that calculates an ordinal from it. > > I think that

You can attach debug info to the Llvm module about LLVM IR, at which point one can throw the executable into any debugger and get llvm level debugging. I've started a patch to revive this feature (DebugIR pass). I've been sidetracked the past month, but I'll come back to it soon :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D40778 Cheers, Siddharth On Thu 4 Jan, 2018, 09:23 Brenda So via llvm-dev,

Hi Kenneth, Can you elaborate what you mean by instruction pointer value? Like the actual instruction with opcode and operands? With the sample code that I showed you, the instrucrtion pointer in the innermost for loop will have access to the following functions: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Instruction.html Alternatively, you can use the dump() operation to dump the instructions out.

Hi I am looking at open projects that LLVM want to implement and it seems to be a suggestion to write an LLVM IR level debugger. Is there any existing LLVM projects out there that already does such a thing? If not, I would like to try implementing one myself. By debugger, I think it means something like gdb, where you can insert breakpoints, run code and observe layout of registers and memory at

Thank you so much! What about discovering the instruction pointer value? Also, does anybody know how to embed an artifact as a resource in a binary? I'd like to have two text sections, and have one copied in from another binary. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Brenda So <sogun3 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > You can write it as if you are writing an optimization pass: >

Is there a way to permit ssh sessions while denying sftp with openssh 3.8? In openssh 4.4+ this is possible using the Match directive with Force Command but I don't know how to configure this in older versions. Thanks in advance for any guidance. Brenda

interesting ... just curious, why did they delete "-debug-ir" to begin with ? Also, it's extremely interesting that gdb and lldb can be used to debug LLVM IR. How does your code work (on a high level)? A high level explanation will help me understand what you've done better. >From first glance, my idea is slight different because your code interfaces with gdb and lldb while

Hi all, I am a fourth year EE bachelors student who is very interested in compilers. I have taken the only compilers course offered in my school and did an independent study with my CS professor. Although I'll begin to work in a couple of months, I definitely want to pursue my interest in compiler design and optimization as a PhD in the future. I am very interested in the z3 SMT solver

Hi, You can write it as if you are writing an optimization pass: http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html It sounds like your highest level is a module, hence you should write a module pass. There is example code on LLVM Programmer's Manual on how to do a function pass: Function* targetFunc = ...; class OurFunctionPass : public FunctionPass { public: OurFunctionPass():

Hi Yuri, When you say code analysis, do you mean checking from source code itself, the intermediate representation, the assembly instructions or the binary? Brenda On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 1:26 AM, Yuri via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There is llvmlite http://llvmlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ , but it > doesn't seem to support reading individual instructions,

Dear R-useRs, I am looking for a why to perform the following: specialweeks<-c(0,2,5,12,18,19,20) weeks<-c(1:30) Now I would like that for every week it is even between which elements of vector special weeks it is. For weeks after 20, the value NA or 20, or even 20-30is fine. Thus for week 1: 0-2 week 2: 2-5 week 3: 2-5 week 4: 2-5 week 5: 5-12 ect.... It is not relevant if those

On 4 January 2018 at 07:11, Brenda So via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > interesting ... just curious, why did they delete "-debug-ir" to begin with ? The metadata describing the information debuggers need (line numbers, variable locations and so on) was evolving rapidly at the time I think. The -debug-ir pass was lagging behind I think, and rarely used as far

I'm having tons of trouble getting the fromstring to work in voicemail.conf. I've tried both voicemail and voicemail2 but the emails still seem to be coming from asterisk pbx. Has anyone had any luck with this? ================= Here's my voicemail.conf: ; ; Voicemail Configuration ; [general] ; Default formats for writing Voicemail ;format=g723sf|wav49|wav format=wav49|gsm|wav ;

The function that returns ENOMEM is actually copy_mm. It returns ENOMEM when dup_mm returns 0. copy_mm receives clone_flags and task_struct * tsk. I think tsk is pointing to the new task (the process being forked). copy_mm assigns some values into *tsk, then: tsk->mm = NULL; tsk->active_mm = NULL; then we check if current process has ->mm; if not, return 0 (effectively

Hello, I hope you are all doing well and thanks in advance. I need to program a transformation of a set of llvm bitcode to have some various techniques woven in. In particular, I need to resolve a given computed target address to one of several in the same way that the function of a dynamic library is resolved, but I need this resolution to happen in the binary target of my choice where I tell