similar to: Tc u32 divisor value

Hi guys , i am starting to "play" with qos in linux. Well , i am trying to setup an ingress filter but i do not know why it is not working. tc add qdisc dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 160kbit burst 256kbit drop flowid :1 After that : iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 So , i think this

Hi, I am currently working on the TC. I have seen some behaviour which seems to be odd. I know someone in the mailing list would have seen this problem or may have some fix for this problem. When I try to include u32 filters with different priority or pref, I could see the filters being set on all the priority''s irrespective of the priority number. See my sample script below and the

Hello I have 2 class-B networks (172.22.0.0/16 and 172.23.0.0/16, over 130k of ip''s) and need to setup traffic tbf shapers with 64kb/s for each ip from 172.22.0.0/16 and 128kb/s for each ip from 172.23.0.0/16 just read lartc and don''t understand how to use u32 for decreasing number of rules and hashing

Hi, I am trying to put together a hashing filter based on example provided in LARTC how-to document. I want to link two hashing filters together where first one will use 3rd octet of an IP address as hashkey and second one will use 4th octet as hash key. How do I tell mask the address so that u32 filter uses 3rd octet as hashkey? Venkatesh K _______________________________________________

What is the difference between lines below? $TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 1 $TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 What divisor is doing? And the last problem... $TC filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: match ip src 10.0.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2: Why after ht

The interface is setup like this: # tc qdisc del dev eth0 root # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 2 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 20mbit ceil 20mbit If I add a second class and a filter to send traffic to it like this: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:130 htb rate 1Mbit ceil 1Mbit # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 130 u32

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be:

Hi to everybody I''m trying to use PRIO qdisc to prioritize the traffic but i have strange problem maybe I''m missing sometging. First i add root qdisc like this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio it''s fine after this i try to match traffic by tos field but i get error invalid match tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip tos 0x10 0xff

Hi Guys, I have a couple of problems that are driving me nuts. This is the script I am using to setup restirctions and bw limitations: #Adding root class. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit burst 2k quantum 1536 tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10 &>/dev/null tc

Hi, I am very new to tc. I added a filter using the following command: tc filter add dev eth0 V parent 20:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle ::128 u32 match ip tos 0x44 0xfc flowid 20:1 To check if the filter rule was indeed added, I run tc filter show dev eth0 parent 20: This gave me the following output: filter protocol ip

Dear all, I have big question in my mind about "tc filter" sintax. If I give "tc -s -d filter sh dev eth0" command, then the output is like below : filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:2 (rule hit 21553629 success 37907)

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure

Hi How can I control which filter a packet will meet first? I have tried changing the order of applying the tc filter scripts and switching flowid number, but ''protocol ip u32 match ip src <ip net> match ip src 0.0.0.0/0'' always kicks in first? >From my script -------------------- # All traffic - Priority: Low tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32

I''m hashing on a non-octet boundary, and it doesn''t seem to be working. I''ve got this set of filters, that does work: # root tc filter add dev eth1 \ parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 \ u32 # ht tc filter add dev eth1 \ parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 \ handle 2: \ u32 divisor 256 # flow tc filter replace dev eth1 \

Hello! What is the significance of "handle" in a u32 filter?? For example, if I have a HTB class 1:1 and three child classes 1:11, 1:12, and 1:13. Within 1:11, I define dsmark, say 2:0, and let it mark packets with certain DSCP. Now, using the u32 filter I need to classify packets of a certain flow (e.g., based on src ip address and dest port), then can someone give me an example of

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Andy Furniss wrote: > The u8 test works OK for me as does the one below. My mistake. I cleaned the rules and removed the ones that collided with the u8 one. There is no error on this. (see explanation bellow). > > When playing with tc filters I always tc qdisc del dev eth0 root and enter > the whole lot again between tests. I always took that as mandatory.

Hi I''m doing traffic shaping with tc on ''10.0.0.0/30'' and ''10.0.0.28/30''. I want to delete part of shaping rules on the fly. (see my configuration at the end of this mail) I wan''t to delete the shaping for ''10.0.0.0/30'' on the fly while still keeping the shaping for part ''10.0.0.28/30'' running. When I for

Hi I have been playing with tc. I''m using htb and sfq. I tried to setup shaping of every ip address within a /20. I found that there must be an upper limit of about 2096 on the number of rules (classes, qdiscs or filters). I was testing a /20 which gives 4096 classes, qdiscs and filters. I''m using hashkey to optimize processing of frames. When executing the script below - it

Hello, it seems, that filtering on nexthdr (TCP/UDP) content, especially src or dst port, is not working. The following has no effect on 2.4.16 or older (even 2.2) kernels: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match tcp dst 3128 0xffff police rate 40kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Even if # tc filter ls dev eth0 parent ffff: filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 filter protocol

Hello, I try to add a U32 source port filter with libnl. My filter can be succesfully added with the library (no error occured) but the filter is not active. If I run "tc filter show dev eth0" I get: filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0